Search

Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

NJA 350 or Latitude

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2017 | 08:04 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default NJA 350 or Latitude

At Netjets.

Would you go to the 350 or Latitude?

Trying to decide...

Pro's and con's.

Thanks
Reply
Old 11-08-2017 | 11:52 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hkdguy
At Netjets.

Would you go to the 350 or Latitude?

Trying to decide...

Pro's and con's.

Thanks

Whichever one has more job opportunities outside of NJA...

Hear me out... when i was hired, in 2007, I had a choice between the X and the Ultra/Encore. Maybe an -800 also...

I chose the X because of obvious ego reasons.

Come 2010 I am furloughed and looking for jobs.. There were jobs to be had in just about every fleet EXCEPT Citation X's. Netjets had by far the largest fleet of Citations X's. And realistically speaking, not a whole ton of corporate flight departments/135's own X's.


So... go with whatever you feel is the most valuable type rating to land jobs elsewhere if needed. I'd assume the 350 is more popular with aviation departments
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 09:46 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kingairfun
Whichever one has more job opportunities outside of NJA...

Hear me out... when i was hired, in 2007, I had a choice between the X and the Ultra/Encore. Maybe an -800 also...

I chose the X because of obvious ego reasons.

Come 2010 I am furloughed and looking for jobs.. There were jobs to be had in just about every fleet EXCEPT Citation X's. Netjets had by far the largest fleet of Citations X's. And realistically speaking, not a whole ton of corporate flight departments/135's own X's.


So... go with whatever you feel is the most valuable type rating to land jobs elsewhere if needed. I'd assume the 350 is more popular with aviation departments
Definitely this
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 09:59 AM
  #4  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 9
From: PIC
Default

They are both VERY busy fleets and both are supposed to be nice airplanes to fly. But as others have pointed out, in the corporate world it's pretty clear a CL-350 type rating would be a more valuable credential for contract flying or another job.

To me, the Challenger is a no-brainer choice.
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 11:27 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Default

Are you a current employee who can hold either one? Both are good airplanes. I think the Challenger type would be way more useful outside of NJA if you want to do contract work, or if you unfortunately find yourself on the street. The Lat is still very new. From a QOL standpoint, you will get run into the ground either one, doesn't matter the flavor.
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlife
Are you a current employee who can hold either one? Both are good airplanes. I think the Challenger type would be way more useful outside of NJA if you want to do contract work, or if you unfortunately find yourself on the street. The Lat is still very new. From a QOL standpoint, you will get run into the ground either one, doesn't matter the flavor.
Jetlife, how are you an expert in all things NJA yet you don't work there and haven't in awhile. You own 1 in 3 posts on anything NJA.
Turning on my ignore list again. The list of 1.
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 01:21 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NJA04
Jetlife, how are you an expert in all things NJA yet you don't work there and haven't in awhile. You own 1 in 3 posts on anything NJA.
Turning on my ignore list again. The list of 1.
NetJets is so easy to figure out, anyone with half a brain can do it. Instead of getting ****y, challenge anything I said. It’s a totally fair statement.
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 02:09 PM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 6
Default

Both choices suck for a pilot at NetJets. I would personally go with the Lattitude and auto throttles and the fact that it is a little less capable of doing everything than the 350. Both fleets will abuse you. Auto throttles may make your life a tiny bit easier. Good luck.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 03:51 PM
  #9  
MWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Default

The 350 doesn’t suck, it’s a good airplane to fly. The trips and duty days are nothing worse than other fleets. I’ve not flown the latitude, but having spent 7 years in the sovereign I’m sure it’s a good plane as well. Management will only abuse you if you allow them to. Take it one leg at a time, DNIF when you are sick, fatigue when you are tired, delay/cancel when the weather is not safe and write up the jet when it’s broke.

In the past there have been slower fleets, those days are gone. All of the new fleets work hard. Expect it and manage it as a professional and you won’t be abused.

Last edited by MWilliams; 11-09-2017 at 04:14 PM.
Reply
Old 11-09-2017 | 05:09 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Default

I would think that from a pilots (and pax) perspective, the much lower cabin altitude of the Latitude would be much less fatiguing (5,900' vs 7,900'), especially after 3-4 hour trips and 12 hour days.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hkdguy
Fractional
20
05-22-2017 11:57 AM
Sata 4000 RP
NetJets
7
06-03-2013 12:20 PM
charleyvarrick
Cargo
34
08-27-2011 11:10 AM
kingairfun
Fractional
13
02-28-2011 10:04 AM
350pilot
Fractional
25
09-26-2006 06:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices