Fractional or Regional
#11
I am very conflicted about which direction to go. I live in a domicile for both NJ and Flex, and I’d have to be a commuter at a regional. I understand QOL and first couple years of pay would be better at a fractional, but my end goal is to get to a legacy, and it seems like a regional is a better and faster path. On the other hand, I wouldn’t mind spending a couple years at a fractional to be honest, even if it takes a little longer to get to a legacy. But there’s always the risk of an economic downturn and losing a chance to do that.
Do your research - the industry changes by the month, but I don't think for one second that a regional is better per se. Our training pipeline is waaaaay faster and we fly a lot. Only wild card here that could break your heart is if you get assigned to the Phenom, you might sit awhile waiting for IOE. But your upgrade to Phenom captain will be much faster too. Regardless of initial fleet type, you can get a captain bid award on the Phenom in 7 or 8 months, way quicker than a regional to getting TPIC; although no longer required TPIC can help your app score better.
FWIW - I left a stagnant regional training pipeline to come to Flex (and planned to stay actually, but life changed); have a CJO at a legacy with a few more interviews coming up. YMMV
Regional commuting is brutal. Save it for a legacy if you must and try the fractional thing.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 165
If you want NetJets, don't do any financial planning based on anything including FDP pay and extended days. You will have almost zero control over their availability and little to no control over what airplane you get assigned initially. Those assigned the XLS are looking at probably at least 10 to 20K less per year than someone from the same class who gets the 350 or Latitude. The recruiters cannot be trusted to tell you accurate pay estimates and we have had many, many first and second year pilots bailing out for other jobs after realizing how far behind NetJets is getting and how much they are actually making while working way harder than they would at an airline. Good luck wherever you end up.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,024
If you are really just planning on getting experience and then bolting for the majors, then Flex is probably your best bet currently if the regional aren't offering quick hours for SICs. NetJets is a long slog to start getting the flight time with the training pipeline super backed up- probably an average of well over 6 weeks after the sim just to start IOE and the very real possibility of getting put into a dying fleet that flies much less than the others while still working a lot of days. NetJets management used to want it to be a career job, but that is no longer the case and it isn't even a good, quick stepping stone job either.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,213
I am very conflicted about which direction to go. I live in a domicile for both NJ and Flex, and I’d have to be a commuter at a regional. I understand QOL and first couple years of pay would be better at a fractional, but my end goal is to get to a legacy, and it seems like a regional is a better and faster path. On the other hand, I wouldn’t mind spending a couple years at a fractional to be honest, even if it takes a little longer to get to a legacy. But there’s always the risk of an economic downturn and losing a chance to do that.
Airline flying is easier. Yes you fly more per duty period. It's more scripted and consistent. Less sit time = more hard flying time per day. More days off. Can use end of month changeover to make 10-20 day mini-vacations. < You'll work hard the rest of the month to make the mini-vacations.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 248
I am very conflicted about which direction to go. I live in a domicile for both NJ and Flex, and I’d have to be a commuter at a regional. I understand QOL and first couple years of pay would be better at a fractional, but my end goal is to get to a legacy, and it seems like a regional is a better and faster path. On the other hand, I wouldn’t mind spending a couple years at a fractional to be honest, even if it takes a little longer to get to a legacy. But there’s always the risk of an economic downturn and losing a chance to do that.
#19
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2022
Posts: 23
This is a really interesting and informative thread! My fiancé has a CJO from Spirit (CFI through a partner program) but now that they have stopped new hire classes until further notice, it definitely is making her look at new options (while her end goal is still a legacy). TBH, I don't even know if she would be looked at by NJ/FJ with bare minimum times...but she will be restricted to commuting out of PNS until end of 2025 and that seems like a LONG time to commute for any airline but especially more so at a regional. Are we missing anything between weighing the factors of: 1) "if you want to go 121, go 121" since she would *likely* build hours faster at a regional/ULCC (while commuting) vice at a fractional 2) withstand or avoid the dread of commuting out of a heavy commuter airport (PNS)?
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 278
...TBH, I don't even know if she would be looked at by NJ/FJ with bare minimum times...but she will be restricted to commuting out of PNS until end of 2025 and that seems like a LONG time to commute for any airline but especially more so at a regional. Are we missing anything between weighing the factors of: 1) "if you want to go 121, go 121" since she would *likely* build hours faster at a regional/ULCC (while commuting) vice at a fractional 2) withstand or avoid the dread of commuting out of a heavy commuter airport (PNS)?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill Lumberg
Fractional
35
02-25-2013 09:30 AM