Search
Notices

QOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2023, 11:37 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 617
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
I’m not particularly a fan either but what is so different about us (from a pilot standpoint) from them now?

Mostly day trips. Opening 1-2 bases a year (we already have as many as many Legacies and we are 1/5 their size). Heavy vacation city (Vegas, Orlando, Denver) based.
Contracts and Teamsters. It would take years to see how that would impact us though. Most likely the entire airline would be ALPA after the merger was completed.
CantStayAway is offline  
Old 03-06-2023, 03:20 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,356
Default

Originally Posted by CantStayAway View Post
Contracts and Teamsters. It would take years to see how that would impact us though. Most likely the entire airline would be ALPA after the merger was completed.
Of course. But dissimilar unions have merged before.

Keep in mind we’re talking about two of the three smallest major airlines merging - hardly a blip on anyone’s radar except ours.
dracir1 is offline  
Old 03-06-2023, 06:10 PM
  #103  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 55
Default

Their 737 order is mainly for replacements, I believe. Not growth. Depending how that SLI went you’d have to consider we’d be getting shafted on upgrades and prob take a hit to our QOL.

I too would be out if they announced an allegiant merger.
AlternateLaw is offline  
Old 03-06-2023, 06:51 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

Stranger things have happened so I don't want to say we will never merge with Allegiant, but its unlikely.

Allegiant is more than just an airline. They are a whole travel company. They own a resort and a golf course management software company. To merge our two companies would be a really odd mix of businesses. I just don't see it happening
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 03-06-2023, 09:50 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,356
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
Stranger things have happened so I don't want to say we will never merge with Allegiant, but its unlikely.

Allegiant is more than just an airline. They are a whole travel company. They own a resort and a golf course management software company. To merge our two companies would be a really odd mix of businesses. I just don't see it happening
very true and agreed - a merger is unlikely.

But I think BB/Franke realize something has to be done as we aren’t really growing comparatively. At our current rate of about +25 pilots a month, we’ll be short of a 15/1 ratio for our aircraft in a couple of years.
dracir1 is offline  
Old 03-07-2023, 07:51 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2021
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
Stranger things have happened so I don't want to say we will never merge with Allegiant, but its unlikely.

Allegiant is more than just an airline. They are a whole travel company. They own a resort and a golf course management software company. To merge our two companies would be a really odd mix of businesses. I just don't see it happening
Wasn't part of LFDR 2.0 planned expansion into hotels, vacations, cruises, etc etc....just like Allegiant?

I actually think an Allegiant merger is the most likely scenario for F9. The 73 fleet is the main thing that gives me pause.
PositiveRate20 is offline  
Old 03-07-2023, 08:17 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,356
Default

Originally Posted by PositiveRate20 View Post
Wasn't part of LFDR 2.0 planned expansion into hotels, vacations, cruises, etc etc....just like Allegiant?

I actually think an Allegiant merger is the most likely scenario for F9. The 73 fleet is the main thing that gives me pause.
Aircraft aren't any reason to hesitate w/ a merger. They are easily disposed of/sold. SWA and Airtran are a good example.
dracir1 is offline  
Old 03-07-2023, 08:44 AM
  #108  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Position: R6
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by turbojet28 View Post
Thats true. We’ve basically been Allegiant for the past 6 months.

Is this statement based from the bid packet or is it based off of what you are able to hold based on your seniority?

Our 2 and 3 day pairings have been rising in percent pairing counts.

For numbers, our base wide pairing numbers for April, based on the April bid packet, are

1 day - 39%
2 day - 44%
3 day - 16 %
4 day - 1%

MIA and TPA are the only domiciles that have a higher 1 day or daily pairing percentage than 2/3 day pairings (But then MIA has 22.5% 3 day pairings, and TPA is at 12.9% 3 day pairings)

Also, the rising percent 2 days are not all red eyes. LAS has a high rede eye pairing makeup, typically. But in April, 81 out of 624 2 day pairings, based on navblue numbers/filters, are red eyes or only 12%. I agree that any red eye is not awesome, but it doesn’t seem to high. All airlines departing LAS have these.

At my seniority, I hold all day turns with an average daily credit/block just above 6.5 hrs/day (or work approx 13 days to have a 85 hour month). If I was a commuter, commuting to my domicile, I would also be able to hold 3 day pairings with pretty much the same daily average credit, also in many other of our domiciles. I would say that is vastly different from Allegiant. I have friends there, and we are pretty far apart.
Shady702 is offline  
Old 03-07-2023, 10:32 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 681
Default

Originally Posted by Shady702 View Post
Is this statement based from the bid packet or is it based off of what you are able to hold based on your seniority?

Our 2 and 3 day pairings have been rising in percent pairing counts.

For numbers, our base wide pairing numbers for April, based on the April bid packet, are

1 day - 39%
2 day - 44%
3 day - 16 %
4 day - 1%

MIA and TPA are the only domiciles that have a higher 1 day or daily pairing percentage than 2/3 day pairings (But then MIA has 22.5% 3 day pairings, and TPA is at 12.9% 3 day pairings)

Also, the rising percent 2 days are not all red eyes. LAS has a high rede eye pairing makeup, typically. But in April, 81 out of 624 2 day pairings, based on navblue numbers/filters, are red eyes or only 12%. I agree that any red eye is not awesome, but it doesn’t seem to high. All airlines departing LAS have these.

At my seniority, I hold all day turns with an average daily credit/block just above 6.5 hrs/day (or work approx 13 days to have a 85 hour month). If I was a commuter, commuting to my domicile, I would also be able to hold 3 day pairings with pretty much the same daily average credit, also in many other of our domiciles. I would say that is vastly different from Allegiant. I have friends there, and we are pretty far apart.
You make some fair points. In my domicile it seems like any “3-day” pairing is actually a two duty-period trip that spans three calendar days, either finishing after midnight of what would be called “day 2”, or with a red eye duty period arriving early in the morning on day 3, all for a whopping 10-12 hours of credit. I guess it’s no different in practicality for a commuter than a genuine 2-day that is worth 10-12 hours but is not commutable. The point I was trying to make (with some hyperbole) is that from the lens of a couple-year timespan, there is no question that we look substantially more like Allegiant than almost any other “major” airline. And, as someone else mentioned, one of the LFDR 2.0 pillars sets a goal of becoming more of a one-stop travel shop.
turbojet28 is offline  
Old 03-07-2023, 10:45 AM
  #110  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 78
Default

Originally Posted by turbojet28 View Post
You make some fair points. In my domicile it seems like any “3-day” pairing is actually a two duty-period trip that spans three calendar days, either finishing after midnight of what would be called “day 2”, or with a red eye duty period arriving early in the morning on day 3, all for a whopping 10-12 hours of credit. I guess it’s no different in practicality for a commuter than a genuine 2-day that is worth 10-12 hours but is not commutable. The point I was trying to make (with some hyperbole) is that from the lens of a couple-year timespan, there is no question that we look substantially more like Allegiant than almost any other “major” airline. And, as someone else mentioned, one of the LFDR 2.0 pillars sets a goal of becoming more of a one-stop travel shop.
This is something I’ve noticed myself, the stats in the bid packet on pairing length are not useful. A single duty period trip that ends after midnight is a “2 day pairing”. A two duty period trip that operates on three calendar days is a “3 day pairing”.

These schedules are not for commuters no matter what the pairing stats say about their length. You can’t even stack most of these multi day trips up next to one another because they start at 5am and finish at midnight.
HacksawDuggan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jstanotherpilot
American
246
01-05-2023 05:03 PM
Pilatus801
Regional
2
07-09-2019 05:13 PM
4thgenaviator
Fractional
82
04-27-2019 10:30 AM
harad
Regional
38
01-13-2019 04:43 AM
DaGreenBanana
Major
79
11-03-2018 09:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices