![]() |
Virtually nothing that's been said the last 2 pages matters or means anything.
You can make all the analogies you like, you can compare us to anyone, but there's only one thing that matters. The NC is going to try their best to get us the best deal they can and then you get to his vote on it. Everyone will have their reasons, and everyone will have their vote. That's it. The NC, ALPA, the NMB and the company will eventually come to a deal. It'll likely be disappointing and it'll likely get voted in. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3894946)
Virtually nothing that's been said the last 2 pages matters or means anything.
You can make all the analogies you like, you can compare us to anyone, but there's only one thing that matters. The NC is going to try their best to get us the best deal they can and then you get to his vote on it. Everyone will have their reasons, and everyone will have their vote. That's it. The NC, ALPA, the NMB and the company will eventually come to a deal. It'll likely be disappointing and it'll likely get voted in. PS- No Snap up = No Vote. |
Originally Posted by spooldup
(Post 3895005)
Not only about contracts, but also about new FOs who somehow think they are inferior for being at a ULCC.... which isn't the case.
PS- No Snap up = No Vote. |
Originally Posted by BusDriver2000
(Post 3895015)
Please stop this nonsense no snap up = no vote crap, we aren’t going to get that we aren’t a legacy, I believe we should vote yes on legacy rates with good work rules. The snap up is a straight pipe dream.
|
Originally Posted by BusDriver2000
(Post 3895015)
Please stop this nonsense no snap up = no vote crap, we aren’t going to get that we aren’t a legacy, I believe we should vote yes on legacy rates with good work rules. The snap up is a straight pipe dream.
extra pax. On a 4 leg day that’s an extra hour of sit time we’re not getting paid for. Keep smiling and handing out the trading cards guys. 🤦♂️ Management is only interested in a M&A right now. When that happens we will get a contract. |
Man, lots of differing opinions on here. Some are spot on (like immediately below) and some just cringe worthy - like the one below that.
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3894946)
Virtually nothing that's been said the last 2 pages matters or means anything.
You can make all the analogies you like, you can compare us to anyone, but there's only one thing that matters. The NC is going to try their best to get us the best deal they can and then you get to his vote on it. Everyone will have their reasons, and everyone will have their vote. That's it. The NC, ALPA, the NMB and the company will eventually come to a deal. It'll likely be disappointing and it'll likely get voted in. Having mentioned that, there are still some that believe there are aspects/items which can't be achieved or obtained. This is ludicrous speak to me. It's basically a display that mgt has done their job well of not only convincing people to accept less, but to also not even ask for fair compensation. Busdriver2000 - I hope you are either not at F9 or don't get to vote.
Originally Posted by BusDriver2000
(Post 3895015)
Please stop this nonsense no snap up = no vote crap, we aren’t going to get that we aren’t a legacy, I believe we should vote yes on legacy rates with good work rules. The snap up is a straight pipe dream.
So, keep in mind, the # of seats, the destinations nor the aircraft matter. In the history of airlines, pilots have never picked their routes, determined the type of aircaft they fly or its age, capabilities or limitations nor have they determined what price to charge the customer. We are a ULCC simply because the owner decided it. And he/they can change that at anytime. Honestly, I couldn't care less how much we charge, where we go or who we carry if you pay me the same as everyone else. There is now an industry standard for A321 pay rates. The ONLY way I fly for $0.01 less is if there are more YES votes to cancel out my NO. |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3895032)
So, keep in mind, the # of seats, the destinations nor the aircraft matter. In the history of airlines, pilots have never picked their routes, determined the type of aircaft they fly or its age, capabilities or limitations nor have they determined what price to charge the customer. We are a ULCC simply because the owner decided it. And he/they can change that at anytime. Honestly, I couldn't care less how much we charge, where we go or who we carry if you pay me the same as everyone else.
|
Originally Posted by AutoBrksMedium
(Post 3895039)
Sorry. I have to ask. Why do regional pilots make so much less than a legacy? Do their unions suck? Do their pilots not know how to vote “no?”
|
Originally Posted by AutoBrksMedium
(Post 3895039)
Sorry. I have to ask. Why do regional pilots make so much less than a legacy? Do their unions suck? Do their pilots not know how to vote “no?”
Because regionals don't sell their own tickets - they are beholden to their mainline partner for pay for specific routes. The fly less people. They "traditionally" had less experienced pilots. And to be honest, the pay difference isn't as great as it used to be. ExpressJet (no longer in business) had a GREAT contract back in the day... |
Originally Posted by VisionWings
(Post 3894861)
cool story bro. 10,700 pilots of the 17,000 were hired at each legacy. Average age of 41-46. So 19-24 years of being an FO since hiring normalized. But thanks for the unsolicited advice. You clearly don’t understand collective bargaining or career earnings Research. Enjoy your career.
It's nice to have choices. That being said, I'm truly hoping you guys get an amazing contract that gets parody (or better) with the big 4 NB rates. Our contract is amendable in a few years and it will give us a springboard. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands