So what this next CBA going to look like
#111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 106
From: 1900D CA
All I know is that last time we got a "ratification incentive" instead of "retro"
It was a chunk of money given to ALPA by the company and divided amongst us based on ALPAs plan. It was not based on credit hours flown since the contract became amendable. It was equally distributed by seat and longevity.
Another point worth mentioning about it; it was a good chunk of money ($75 Million I think) but it was needed to satisfy issues from the previous contract and bankruptcy. The company and union had a LOA dating back to bankruptcy that said the company would negotiate pay raises if/when Frontier returned to profitability. Of course they never did that (shocking) and therefore had to sweeten the pot to get us to sign the new contract. I hope that makes sense.
Anyhow, for me, the ratification incentive maybe amounted to 1/3rd of what full retro would have been.
#112
Agreed, there will be cola raises for years 1-11. Year 12 pay will see 3 raises during the duration of a 3 yr contract then no raises until a new contract. That's why i want to see a snap up clause if our peers get new contracts and we find ourselves $100 an hour less than our peers like we are now.
#113
Agreed, there will be cola raises for years 1-11. Year 12 pay will see 3 raises during the duration of a 3 yr contract then no raises until a new contract. That's why i want to see a snap up clause if our peers get new contracts and we find ourselves $100 an hour less than our peers like we are now.
absolutely,
The proposal is a no vote from me. The legacies are opening their negotiations by the time this reaches a TA. All the while tariffs are increasing costs for everyday necessities. If frontier can’t afford to pay us what we are worth which is snap up current and future to the next contract cycle of legacies to be within 5% of the legacies then they need to change their management team. It isn’t our responsibility to be profitable it’s the C suite. They have a huge cost saving advantage and they can’t turn a profit. I’m not voting yes to anything less than what the legacies are making now plus 5-6%. It’s not like management could make a profit with those lower pay rates according to their current advantage or they should be making profit. They aren’t. It’s not our job. But we carry more passengers with cheaper labor all over the place and this company can’t make profit. So pay me til you fold or change management. No more concessions from the group. It does nothing for us. It obviously doesn’t help the business be viable. We may as well be paid for the stuff we have to put up with.
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 106
From: 1900D CA
absolutely,
The proposal is a no vote from me. The legacies are opening their negotiations by the time this reaches a TA. All the while tariffs are increasing costs for everyday necessities. If frontier can’t afford to pay us what we are worth which is snap up current and future to the next contract cycle of legacies to be within 5% of the legacies then they need to change their management team. It isn’t our responsibility to be profitable it’s the C suite. They have a huge cost saving advantage and they can’t turn a profit. I’m not voting yes to anything less than what the legacies are making now plus 5-6%. It’s not like management could make a profit with those lower pay rates according to their current advantage or they should be making profit. They aren’t. It’s not our job. But we carry more passengers with cheaper labor all over the place and this company can’t make profit. So pay me til you fold or change management. No more concessions from the group. It does nothing for us. It obviously doesn’t help the business be viable. We may as well be paid for the stuff we have to put up with.
The proposal is a no vote from me. The legacies are opening their negotiations by the time this reaches a TA. All the while tariffs are increasing costs for everyday necessities. If frontier can’t afford to pay us what we are worth which is snap up current and future to the next contract cycle of legacies to be within 5% of the legacies then they need to change their management team. It isn’t our responsibility to be profitable it’s the C suite. They have a huge cost saving advantage and they can’t turn a profit. I’m not voting yes to anything less than what the legacies are making now plus 5-6%. It’s not like management could make a profit with those lower pay rates according to their current advantage or they should be making profit. They aren’t. It’s not our job. But we carry more passengers with cheaper labor all over the place and this company can’t make profit. So pay me til you fold or change management. No more concessions from the group. It does nothing for us. It obviously doesn’t help the business be viable. We may as well be paid for the stuff we have to put up with.
Now, your won't accept any raise less than legacies plus?
Crazy.
Also, did you not see that the union is already lowering our ask to less than legacy pay?
#115
Stirring the pot
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 66
From: Off reserve 🤫
Wait a second. You've been talking non stop on this forum about how Frontier can't afford to give us any raise at all. We are a failing business and failing business model.
Now, your won't accept any raise less than legacies plus?
Crazy.
Also, did you not see that the union is already lowering our ask to less than legacy pay?
Now, your won't accept any raise less than legacies plus?
Crazy.
Also, did you not see that the union is already lowering our ask to less than legacy pay?
of course….the next CBA will be a glitter turd just like the last one 🙄
#116
Wait a second. You've been talking non stop on this forum about how Frontier can't afford to give us any raise at all. We are a failing business and failing business model.
Now, your won't accept any raise less than legacies plus?
Crazy.
Also, did you not see that the union is already lowering our ask to less than legacy pay?
Now, your won't accept any raise less than legacies plus?
Crazy.
Also, did you not see that the union is already lowering our ask to less than legacy pay?
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 106
From: 1900D CA
#118
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 772
Likes: 11
#119
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 857
Likes: 22
#120
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 728
Likes: 22
From: Bus CA
Indigo is private equity, they have controlling and minority stakes in companies. They have “Indigo Advised Funds” on aviation related sectors but they are most definitely not a hedge fund.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



