![]() |
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3927927)
If we stick to demanding an industry standard contract, which I believe we should, it will force indigo to either run an airline or dump their position and put a for sale sign on the front lawn. Either one sounds fine to me.
|
Originally Posted by BobSacamano
(Post 3927897)
Uh. What ?
|
Originally Posted by Planedrive
(Post 3927942)
Indigo isn’t dumping anything. They’re making $15 million in profit on each sale-leaseback, with 180 aircraft still on order. That’s $2.7 billion in pure profit just from fleet transactions. All they have to do is ride out the current domestic oversupply, and they’ll be back to printing money.
The way they are printing money right now gives them flexibility to bail. A new industry contract hand cuffs them to the airline. It would require a new CEO, new management and a new vision without the ability to predict profits out into the future the way they can now. |
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3927969)
An industry standard contract would wreck that profit margin. Not only would the contract itself chew up their sale-leaseback profit, they would have to change the way the airline operates to pay for the contract. Frontier was designed to just barely function well enough to pay those leases and not get shut down by the feds.
The way they are printing money right now gives them flexibility to bail. A new industry contract hand cuffs them to the airline. It would require a new CEO, new management and a new vision without the ability to predict profits out into the future the way they can now. so keep picking up any and all available open time and definitely WORK on your days off and vacation 🤪 |
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3927969)
An industry standard contract would wreck that profit margin.
|
100% agreed, if you cant pay your employees industry standard rates just raise the ticket prices
|
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3927969)
An industry standard contract would wreck that profit margin. Not only would the contract itself chew up their sale-leaseback profit, they would have to change the way the airline operates to pay for the contract. Frontier was designed to just barely function well enough to pay those leases and not get shut down by the feds.
The way they are printing money right now gives them flexibility to bail. A new industry contract hand cuffs them to the airline. It would require a new CEO, new management and a new vision without the ability to predict profits out into the future the way they can now. |
Originally Posted by ginntonic
(Post 3927974)
Not our problem. The C-suite needs to figure out how to pay market rates for an Airbus pilot, just as they pay market rates for fuel, aircraft parts, food, and even office supplies.
|
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
(Post 3927969)
An industry standard contract would wreck that profit margin. Not only would the contract itself chew up their sale-leaseback profit, they would have to change the way the airline operates to pay for the contract. Frontier was designed to just barely function well enough to pay those leases and not get shut down by the feds.
The way they are printing money right now gives them flexibility to bail. A new industry contract hand cuffs them to the airline. It would require a new CEO, new management and a new vision without the ability to predict profits out into the future the way they can now. Biffle has publicly said that with new labor contracts in place in 2026 Frontier will still maintain a 40% cost advantage over the competition. Frontier will likely raise ticket prices by $5 to $10 dollars to pass the cost along to the customer. Exactly like what every other airline has already done. We are going to be fine. Just like last time. |
Originally Posted by ThatsTheSpirit
(Post 3927986)
I've heard this a ton, but I don't get it. How does the Sale-Leaseback make a profit? Please explain to like I am 5... :)
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands