Search

Notices
GoJet Regional Airline

Gojet dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2011 | 06:41 AM
  #141  
outofwork's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
If gojet gets a dtw base I hope their pilots move there otherwise getting to work is going to be pretty hard with 5 alpa carriers being based there all losing flying because of delta's decision. There is not enough sand bags we could use you douche bags for ballast though if you want
I'm furloughed from an alpa carrier due to losing flying to another alpa carrier because of Delta's decision so the losing of flying to another regional is nothing new to Delta example: those N***CA 700's with ASA on the front or the N***LR 900's that were slated to go to Comair after the freedom mess was over. Those airplanes would have prevented my furlough but they are at ASA now. The regional does not own the flying, mainline does.

Last edited by outofwork; 09-02-2011 at 07:16 AM.
Old 09-02-2011 | 07:00 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pause
Trans States pilots HAD the opportunity to fly those CRJ-7's. Hulas was going to be REQUIRED to have a different certificate anyway due to the AA scope lnguage. Trans States pilots, MEC and ALPO through pure arrogance lost the flying. The TSA pilots wanted more money to fly them (which is understandable) but their arrogant MEC & pilot group flushed the flying away by puffing out their chest and voting NO. Hind sight is always 20/20. The TSA pilots SHOULD have voted yes (to at LEAST get the a/c on property to be flown by TSA pilots) FIRST then worked on the pay issue later. But, now they just blame everyone but themselves for the whole debacle.
this ALWAYS makes me laugh. well not really... EVERY single person on here whines and complains and b!tches and moans about how regional pilots agree to fly for such low wages, nobody will stand up for themselves, we dont get paid enough, blah blah blah. but as soon as someone gets hosed because they DID stand up for themselves it was pure arrogance!! are you *******KING kidding me?! more justification bullsh!t!

we all know if they had accepted what was dealt to at least secure the flying everyone would instead be complaining about how another airline lowered the bar once again. how bout instead of claiming the pilots were arrogant, we instead say they were naive for expecting unity from the rest of the "brotherhood" in their fight. absolutely sickening...
Old 09-02-2011 | 08:01 AM
  #143  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: 2000 light years from home
Default

Originally Posted by expectholding
this ALWAYS makes me laugh. well not really... EVERY single person on here whines and complains and b!tches and moans about how regional pilots agree to fly for such low wages, nobody will stand up for themselves, we dont get paid enough, blah blah blah. but as soon as someone gets hosed because they DID stand up for themselves it was pure arrogance!! are you *******KING kidding me?! more justification bullsh!t!

we all know if they had accepted what was dealt to at least secure the flying everyone would instead be complaining about how another airline lowered the bar once again. how bout instead of claiming the pilots were arrogant, we instead say they were naive for expecting unity from the rest of the "brotherhood" in their fight. absolutely sickening...
Failing to secure scope is the gift that keeps on giving (for the company). By securing scope, the TSA pilots would have had leverage in all future section 6 negotiations. The TSA pilots could have stood up for themselves when they had a leg to stand on.

If TSA ALPA had told the TSA pilots that the 4 year contract extension in exchange for scope was the best they could get, I highly doubt it would have been voted down. The ALPA reps told it's pilots to vote no. The premise was that there would be a better deal.

2 months after the pilots voted it down, the TSA MEC Chairman signed the GoJet LOA and submitted it to the company having made only 1 change. The 4 year deal he campaigned against was changed to 3 years. The company rejected the offer stating that the 4 year deal was the end of the road.

If the 4 year deal was so bad, why did the MEC Chairman crawl back to the company with a signed, 3 year deal in hand? Why did he do it all under the table without a pilot vote? Why did he depart TSA shortly after for greener pastures, leaving behind a complete disaster?

My whole point is that by not securing scope, the company now has the ability to keep their costs in the basement & undercut the industry, permanently. This has allowed them to gain more flying at the expense of higher cost jobs. Had the TSA pilots voted for the GoJet LOA, this ability would have been temporary, but instead, once again, it is permanent. So, did TSA pilots really stand up for themselves or not?

I firmly believe that the TSA pilots had the best of intentions, but were mislead by their reps. I also believe that their reps had the best of intentions, but misjudged the situation. I have tremendous respect for the TSA pilots and hope for nothing but the best for them. I fear, however, that the end of the line is much closer.

As far as the original purpose of this thread, I would not recommend that anyone to go to GoJet. Unfortunately, it is an attractive offer for many frustrated long-term FOs. A quick place to build PIC time, and a subsequent shot at the majors is the whole point of this career.

I disagree with many about what to do about GoJet pilots. Continuing jumpseat wars more than a half decade after TSA stopped pursuing that flying is unproductive. I do not choose who rides on the jumpseat anymore, but when I did, I took GoJet pilots on a couple of occasions. They became a very captive audience when I told them what I thought about Gojet, and the negative impact it had.

I don't have positive feelings for the original GoJet folks who selfishly fought the TSA pilots to keep the flying divided. Anyone hired after the flying was voted down, and after the NMB allowed separate operation to continue does not deserve mistreatment. They also don't deserve my sympathy because they knew full well what they were getting in to.

Last edited by get there itis; 09-02-2011 at 09:04 AM.
Old 09-02-2011 | 09:07 AM
  #144  
RgrMurdock's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Default

I would love to see all three groups stand together to fight for scope and job security. But there is too much apathy and intimidation on the gjet side. The guys that started the whole mess still run that company. The "union" wouldn't help you if you got fired for not wearing your hat.
Old 09-02-2011 | 09:17 AM
  #145  
pause's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Frenchy plane/ Left
Default

Originally Posted by expectholding
this ALWAYS makes me laugh. well not really... EVERY single person on here whines and complains and b!tches and moans about how regional pilots agree to fly for such low wages, nobody will stand up for themselves, we dont get paid enough, blah blah blah. but as soon as someone gets hosed because they DID stand up for themselves it was pure arrogance!! are you *******KING kidding me?! more justification bullsh!t!

we all know if they had accepted what was dealt to at least secure the flying everyone would instead be complaining about how another airline lowered the bar once again. how bout instead of claiming the pilots were arrogant, we instead say they were naive for expecting unity from the rest of the "brotherhood" in their fight. absolutely sickening...
No, I'm not kidding. Listen closely......."SECURE THE A/C FIRST" then work on the pay.
Old 09-02-2011 | 10:03 AM
  #146  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by pause
Trans States pilots HAD the opportunity to fly those CRJ-7's. Hulas was going to be REQUIRED to have a different certificate anyway due to the AA scope language. Trans States pilots, MEC and ALPO through pure arrogance lost the flying. The TSA pilots wanted more money to fly them (which is understandable) but their arrogant MEC & pilot group flushed the flying away by puffing out their chest and voting NO. Hind sight is always 20/20. The TSA pilots SHOULD have voted yes (to at LEAST get the a/c on property to be flown by TSA pilots) FIRST then worked on the pay issue later. But, now they just blame everyone but themselves for the whole debacle.
First of all, I ALWAYS find it sad when pilots criticize other pilots for attempting to better our profession. I'm really shocked that you called the TSA pilots arrogant for demanding more pay for a larger airplane. It truly is sad.

Second, did you see how long it took TSA to get a new contract? Just voting yes and then going for pay raises would've equaled flying -700's for years at below standard 50 seat rates. Sad
Old 09-02-2011 | 10:16 AM
  #147  
minimwage4's Avatar
2 days off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Embraer Systems Analyst
Default

Originally Posted by RgrMurdock
I would love to see all three groups stand together to fight for scope and job security. But there is too much apathy and intimidation on the gjet side. The guys that started the whole mess still run that company. The "union" wouldn't help you if you got fired for not wearing your hat.
Why would they do that tho what benefit is there for them? Gojet just got more flying, they're about to grow even more. The only party that needs help, the party that has no leverage is Trans States.
Old 09-02-2011 | 10:25 AM
  #148  
minimwage4's Avatar
2 days off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Embraer Systems Analyst
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
First of all, I ALWAYS find it sad when pilots criticize other pilots for attempting to better our profession. I'm really shocked that you called the TSA pilots arrogant for demanding more pay for a larger airplane. It truly is sad.

Second, did you see how long it took TSA to get a new contract? Just voting yes and then going for pay raises would've equaled flying -700's for years at below standard 50 seat rates. Sad
The eventual demise of TSA because of what happened back then will be even more sad. Hindsight is 20/20.
Old 09-02-2011 | 08:28 PM
  #149  
monster900's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

All the undercutting, taking other pilots job's BS!!!! What about the almighty SKYWEST undercutting Mesa's US Express flying? They're flying at a loss just to keep those 200's flying. Talk about undercutting!!!
Old 09-02-2011 | 10:10 PM
  #150  
Salukipilot4590's Avatar
Scary...Scary...
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 11
From: Rollin' Down tha 405
Default

Originally Posted by Pantera
Gojet Airlines, I work for Gojet and it is the best thing I have done yet. I used to work for Comair and at first I thought it was the best thing I had done but after being at Gojet I see how much time I wasted at Comair. I circled the drain at Comair and almost got flushed but I got out of the bowl before that happened.

Gojet is not perfect and it is a regional and as one poster said a long time ago on here "there is no such thing as a good regional". Gojet believe it or not is a good bunch of people and they have the best positive attitude I have seen yet. At Comair it was always a battle with scheduling and always being screwed somehow. Here so far everyone is so pro-active it is a 180 from what I was used to. I actually call scheduling to see if there is anything I can do for them. (yeh surprised me too)

I never back stabbed anyone to take this job, I am not a scab. I never crossed a picket line or flew struck work. Heck Alpa sent the United guys here does that make them scabs too? I am just trying to get ahead and anyone that says I will not be able to get a job later on is so full of BS. I learned all of this is BS when one day I was DH on Freedom when I was at Comair, plane was full so I volunteered to JS to get a pax on. Turns out the Captain had less than 2500 hours and the FO had 600 hours. Here I was at OH with 7000 hours. (dual rated) *** did I do wrong? At that point I learned I am out for me in this cut throat world. I can stand on my soap box only so long before the bills need paying.

Gojet is a good place, it is small and everyone knows your name. The training is good and the checkride is not easy. The aircraft are good the flight attendants are hot and the schedule is for the most part very productive. The pay is regional pay not the best and not the least. Upgrade time well who knows last Captain I flew with had been here 9 months.

When I was at Comair all we ever heard was "Delta wants to get rid of the 50 seaters" Well Gojet has no 50's, CRJ700's only! When you look at all the other DCI carriers look at their fleet.

Now as far as all these guys saying "oooh if I find out your are a Gojet pilot I will not let you on my jumpseat!" Horse Hockey! Never been turned down yet and if someone did turn me down well guess what when I turn down someone from their company and they ask why I will say well go ask your buddy Captain XXXXX he turned me down. All these posters on here that spew that trash are just that, trash they are just ****ed off chair flyers.

Ok now I have said everything good about Gojet, I will include some bad. They as of now do not pay for your hotel while in training. That can be pretty tough if you do not have money in the bank. Cost me about $2000 while I was in training but you can do it cheaper and a lot of guys did. My accountant will have a field day with my expenses but in the long run I am still out my money. It can be done for less there is the Pilot Projects which charge $70 a week I think.

If anyone is considering Gojet as an employer do not hesitate to PM me for a phone number to answer your questions. I AM VERY HAPPY I AM HERE AND IT WAS A GOOD DECISION FOR ME!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SrfNFly227
GoJet
184
10-31-2009 09:09 PM
Foxcow
Regional
200
09-13-2009 09:00 PM
ERJ135
GoJet
121
06-05-2009 09:58 AM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
SkyHigh
GoJet
179
02-09-2009 07:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices