Green New Deal! (Air Travel Unnecessary)
#231
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Yes, I’m aware of what you mean, and that robbing the military to pay for public works is a favorite of the progressives. If you want to throw shade at the F35 program, and it certainly deserves its share, you should first ask yourself what is the average age of the planes it’s replacing.
I know which I’m choosing if the question is put to me as to whether I’d rather spend a large amount of money on a public works project of dubious value or ensuring that our war fighters aren’t taking to the air in 30+ year old equipment.
I know which I’m choosing if the question is put to me as to whether I’d rather spend a large amount of money on a public works project of dubious value or ensuring that our war fighters aren’t taking to the air in 30+ year old equipment.
#232
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,788
#233
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
I have expressed no advocacy for this program. I was simply trying to show you that big scary numbers really aren’t, and should be understood in context instead of reflexively used to refute a public works proposal.
#234
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
I’m gonna recommend a book here, because you’re missing a lot. In Philip ball’s “critical mass,” there’s a discussion of complex systems as “energy states” and how there can be different meta-stable states depending on where and how “forces” are applied to the system. In this case, forces applied to overcome barriers of entry, such as real estate acquisition, regulation, and initial capital outlays can very easily put you into a new meta-stable (and profitable) state.
Your “law of economics” is woefully simple to the point of uselessness.
But beyond that, profit is a great motive, but may not be the only thing by which some people want to see the world shaped.
Your “law of economics” is woefully simple to the point of uselessness.
But beyond that, profit is a great motive, but may not be the only thing by which some people want to see the world shaped.
I wish AOC would come out with a bill mandating the price of electricity be below NG, that would help me out.
#235
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,788
#236
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
I will freely admit that I believe the country should spend a large amount of money on modernizing and improving our infrastructure in the face of climate change rather than throwing it in the garbage by overspending it on the DoD.
This exact proposal? Maybe not. Elements of it? Sure.
This exact proposal? Maybe not. Elements of it? Sure.
#237
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
I will freely admit that I believe the country should spend a large amount of money on modernizing and improving our infrastructure in the face of climate change rather than throwing it in the garbage by overspending it on the DoD.
This exact proposal? Maybe not. Elements of it? Sure.
This exact proposal? Maybe not. Elements of it? Sure.
#239
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,788
I will freely admit that I believe the country should spend a large amount of money on modernizing and improving our infrastructure in the face of climate change rather than throwing it in the garbage by overspending it on the DoD.
This exact proposal? Maybe not. Elements of it? Sure.
This exact proposal? Maybe not. Elements of it? Sure.
I’d be more worried about DoD spending if we weren’t engaged in two low intensity conflicts, weren’t in the midst of replacing decades old weapon systems in mass and the world had shown at any point that it wouldn’t descend straight into another global conflict without Uncle Sam butting in where he often shouldn’t have to.
Climate change doesn’t concern me. The climate is always changing and one good volcanic eruption puts out as much pollution as man has in any given decade. It’s just hysterics to drive an agenda.
Now, leaving the world a better place for my progeny? That I’ll get behind. But I won’t destroy our economy trying to cram it all in in one decade. High speed rail? Complete pipe dream. Offering incentives to start modernizing and greening up our buildings? Sure. Making cleaner fuels and power production a priority? Yup, that’s feasible. And many More.
But just tossing out seismic shifts in policy and our economy/tax system and cramming them down the country’s throat for nebulous fear driven concepts or because we went to the moon in a decade is non productive and a non starter. As is anything that starts with “...well Europe does it”.
Frankly, the progressive Utopia out west is doing such a bang up job of boondoggling their public works rail project that I would think it would be an object lesson as to why some of these things aren’t feasible even if the technology is.
#240
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 824
Is climate.gov fake news? I’m all for having a good debate on all of this but you can’t just shoot out a statement that’s easily disproven with a quick google search.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post