Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Paranoid Pilots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2021, 09:07 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
velosnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Some devices are more secure than others. But I'm aware of one scheme on a company-owned ipad where the device simply recorded video data and saved it. This was then uploaded during a periodic data-synch process which was a legit component of the business tools installed on the device (this was not an airline).
Have a link? In any case, one incident that appears incidental doesn't account for the need to be overly paranoid. By all means, protections and language should be in place to prevent accidental or purposeful privacy breaches but I don't think that supports the paranoia some exhibit.
velosnow is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 09:10 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Admiral
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by velosnow View Post
Hacking an iGadget or otherwise is nearly impossible and only more possible (though still quite tough) if it has been jail broken by yourself. I can virtually guarantee you no mid-level manager or otherwise at an airline has the ability to get into your company issued gadget and spy on you.
They wouldn't have to hack it, if the company owns the device they have the right to put whatever software they want onto said device. That's why many (I would suspect all) unionized airlines address this in the contract.
Flyhayes is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 09:17 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
velosnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by Broncofan View Post
I have flown with a couple people like you mention, but more I’m surprised about how many believe in crazy political conspiracy theories. For a well educated group it’s entertaining to hear some of the stuff these guys come up with. Had one guy tell me he never pays federal income tax from his rental properties because he never agreed to do so in the first place and it’s unconstitutional for the government to make him.
They are certainly out there...

"Utah pilot who fled tax charges is arrested in N.C."

https://www.standard.net/police-fire...c7d97230c.html
velosnow is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 09:43 AM
  #34  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by velosnow View Post
Have a link? In any case, one incident that appears incidental doesn't account for the need to be overly paranoid. By all means, protections and language should be in place to prevent accidental or purposeful privacy breaches but I don't think that supports the paranoia some exhibit.
My brother is a software engineer (I have the background too, haven't used it in decades, but we talk about it). It was a case he told me about. He does enterprise security and they look hard at all the client devices and apps since those are usually the gateway for malicious actors.

Apple is tighter than MS, but it's by no means airtight.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 10:34 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
velosnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
My brother is a software engineer (I have the background too, haven't used it in decades, but we talk about it). It was a case he told me about. He does enterprise security and they look hard at all the client devices and apps since those are usually the gateway for malicious actors.

Apple is tighter than MS, but it's by no means airtight.
Sure, however my point is it doesn't justify the paranoia that some exhibit. There isn't a demonstrated need to cover your camera or remove company devices from meetings. The evidence doesn't support it.

Back to original post, there also isn't reason to live your life in fear. Don't be an arse and you'll get through this career (and life) just fine. Feel bad for those that hinder their own life experiences and relationships on the off chance something they do will get them in trouble.
velosnow is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 12:59 PM
  #36  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by velosnow View Post
Sure, however my point is it doesn't justify the paranoia that some exhibit. There isn't a demonstrated need to cover your camera or remove company devices from meetings. The evidence doesn't support it.

Back to original post, there also isn't reason to live your life in fear. Don't be an arse and you'll get through this career (and life) just fine. Feel bad for those that hinder their own life experiences and relationships on the off chance something they do will get them in trouble.
Covering the camera is cheap insurance.

We went to extreme lengths with mil security (I was TS+), don't need to go that far obviously with personal privacy and confidential business (union) info but you'd remiss to totally disregard the risks. I have a good sense as to the scope of what's possible, and it's very nearly anything and everything. Even the best world-class encryption can be and often is compromised by flaws, backdoors, loopholes in the HW or various software. Or plain operator error/negligence.

My brother also related some cases where managers for large companies had actually hired outside "investigators" (hackers) to enable their digital snooping, to further their own personal interests within the organization. These were companies which would not remotely conduct or condone illegal hacking/surveillence, but they had some rogue people.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 03:00 PM
  #37  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...eces-tape.html

I’ve flown with an FO who wouldn’t even greet an FA as “they’re dangerous”.
Then we have the Union political hacks,
We also have the guy whose sole mission in life is to convince any new hires that the company is out to get them through Scheduling shenanigans.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 03:12 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CA1900's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by ROFF View Post
I’m not paranoid but I put tape over the camera and mic of my company iPad. I know for a fact they’ve been monitoring me.

They’re monitoring you too!

But I don’t cover mine, so they’ll just monitor you through mine.
CA1900 is online now  
Old 01-13-2021, 03:18 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ROFF's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...eces-tape.html

I’ve flown with an FO who wouldn’t even greet an FA as “they’re dangerous”.
Then we have the Union political hacks,
We also have the guy whose sole mission in life is to convince any new hires that the company is out to get them through Scheduling shenanigans.
A wise man he is.

I’m inclined to put the tape over my mouth as well when not in the cockpit. Can never be too cautious with this career.
ROFF is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 03:44 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by 123494 View Post
Do any of you find yourself flying with fellow pilots (CA or FO) who are overly paranoid and think the company/world is out to get them?

Flew with a CA recently who was probably the best pilot I have ever flown with. Was very smooth and flew the plane by the book. Other than his flying and ADM, he was extremely paranoid about everything. Some examples were:

1. Afraid to speak to the FAs. Would only talk when a flight related issue came up. Otherwise, he was convinced they would take something he said the wrong way and report it.

2. Afraid of Pax. Was convinced they had video cameras out and ready to catch any mistake we made and put it on social media. Didn't like making PAs and avoided eye contact in gate area.

3. Afraid of Gate Agents. Was convinced they were writing notes trying to pin any delay on him. Had an extensive notebook to record every move they made and what Zulu time.

4. Afraid of dispatch. If he had to call them, he would never use his name, only the flight number and tail. Not sure why.

Again, he was a fine aviator and I picked up some good techniques from him. I could go on with examples of the paranoia. Just curious if others have had any similar trips. Are pilots just programed to think this way?
Judging by the posts on these boards I would say the paranoid pilots hang out on APC. The posts on here usually stoke the fires of paranoia.
BoldPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whalesurfer
Cargo
7
12-03-2019 10:45 AM
SpecialTracking
United
158
06-21-2019 03:59 PM
Route66
American
6
04-08-2015 06:38 AM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices