Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
F-16s Stop "Hostile Takeover" >

F-16s Stop "Hostile Takeover"

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

F-16s Stop "Hostile Takeover"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2007 | 10:40 PM
  #1  
vagabond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,025
Likes: 0
From: C-172
Default F-16s Stop "Hostile Takeover"

Don't know whether to laugh or to cry. At least they didn't shoot the poor guy down.

From Associated Press:

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - F-16s intercepted a small plane after officials misinterpreted a phrase uttered by the pilot as his aircraft flew over military airspace: "hostile takeover."

The pilot was talking about business, the plane's owner said. But a frantic air traffic controller couldn't confirm that because the pilot had turned off his radio, said Maj. Roger Yates of the Clay County Sheriff's Department.

Within minutes, federal aviation authorities scrambled the fighter jets to intercept the plane Monday evening just outside of Oklahoma City and escort it to the Clay County airport near Mosby.

Once it was on the ground, more than a dozen armed federal agents and tactical deputies surrounded the plane. Federal authorities, who interviewed the pilot for two hours, said Tuesday that there was no threat to anyone and no charges would be filed.

"People should be very careful in this heightened state of security about comments they make regarding airplanes and air traffic," said FBI spokesman Jeff Lanza.

The plane's owner, Dr. Kenneth E. Mann, said the pilot was heading back to Kansas City after dropping him off in Oklahoma, where Mann regularly travels to provide treatment at several hospitals. Neither he nor authorities would identify the pilot.

Authorities said the pilot was flying over Vance Air Force Base in Oklahoma on his way back to the Kansas City area when he notified the air traffic tower at the air base that he was entering the base's airspace.

When asked what his destination was, the pilot said he preferred not to say because competitors could use such information to steal clients. He was not required to give a destination, Mann said. He said the pilot was concerned because he worked "in a hostile business environment."

The pilot was speaking about a "hostile takeover" of a company, Yates said.

Mann said FBI agents were at his home less than an hour after the incident.

"Mistakes happen," he said, "and in the times we live in after 9/11, it's better to overreact than not react at all."
Reply
Old 06-13-2007 | 11:39 PM
  #2  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Wow, that would be one hell of a surprise. And not the pleasant kind either...

-Ben
Reply
Old 06-14-2007 | 12:46 AM
  #3  
limelight's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: C-17 Everything
Default

Holy crap. The F-16's intercepted a "small plane" near OKC and they landed at Clay County. That's a pretty damned long way. I seriously doubt an F-16 could evey fly that long at the speed of a small airplane. Sounds like AP needs to check their facts.
Reply
Old 06-14-2007 | 06:29 AM
  #4  
the King's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: JS32 FO
Default

Their definition of small plane is anything less than a CRJ. I'd bet it was a smaller jet. I'd bet on a Citation or Beech or Lear.
Reply
Old 06-14-2007 | 07:35 AM
  #5  
Slice's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
From: Spartan
Default

Originally Posted by limelight
Holy crap. The F-16's intercepted a "small plane" near OKC and they landed at Clay County. That's a pretty damned long way. I seriously doubt an F-16 could evey fly that long at the speed of a small airplane. Sounds like AP needs to check their facts.
You don't need to be co-speed to escort/intercept. It could have been a Cub and still have been done.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AUS_ATC
Cargo
106
12-23-2006 05:59 PM
AUS_ATC
Technical
106
12-23-2006 05:59 PM
AUS_ATC
Major
24
12-18-2006 07:56 AM
Topper
Major
10
08-31-2006 01:33 PM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
0
09-27-2005 11:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices