Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
We are the FAA.  We are here to help you... >

We are the FAA. We are here to help you...

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

We are the FAA. We are here to help you...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2022, 12:16 AM
  #11  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,083
Default

The FAA should get into the car rental business.
We’re not happy till it Hertz

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, do not ever start a dialogue with the FAA.
Any attempt to communicate with you to get “your side of the story” is an attempt to determine your guilt not your innocence.
Do yourself a favor and join AOPA for their legal plan recreational pilot or otherwise.
Consider it part of the cost of your hobby.
Its not more then one hour’s rental cost.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 05-10-2022, 02:45 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 304
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
That's all based just on his side of the story.

Trent is misrepresenting the nature of the location pretty badly. He want's everyone to believe that this was some remote area. It's not.He says multiple times “very sparsely populated area”, but it ain’t. There are 12 residences within a ¼ mile of the friend’s back yard. That’s not “sparsely populated”



He says "It has a minimum lot size of 10 acres, but a lot of the lots are much bigger." Which really isn’t true, the adjacent lots in the subdivision are no bigger than 12.6 acres, that’s not “much bigger”

As a point of reference a square 10 acre parcel would be 660'x660', granted that's larger than many subdivisions, but it ain't out in the middle of farms and pastures.



He says " A lot of them are vacant as well" Which is not true. Of the 8 lots directly adjacent his friend’s lot all but one have a house built on it (and there’s a house right next to that lot) and of the 24 lots in the subdivision block, all but 3 have houses built on them. This is hardly vacant land.



He says: " The area to the north of them is all BLM, so there's thousands of acres of public land" Which is true as far as it goes, but this is just misdirection. The incident didn’t take place in the open public land to the north, the incident took place in the subdivision where his buddy lives.


So if he's misrepresenting this, what else is he misrepresenting?
A Squared is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FA24
Southwest
0
11-12-2019 09:37 AM
westwind1
Aviation Law
85
12-25-2015 02:18 PM
SayAlt
Major
51
05-29-2015 06:57 AM
FEtrip7
Cargo
38
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices