Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Wow, here I thought Pilots were whiners.......... >

Wow, here I thought Pilots were whiners..........

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Wow, here I thought Pilots were whiners..........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2009 | 11:06 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Out
Default

Originally Posted by JayDee
You nearly had me release upon you a written tirade of which you have yet to have had the privilege to see before...


We are all volunteers... There are VERY few if any Vietnam era draftees still in service today. We know full well what we signed up for. To call us whiners? When? We get paid squat, have the worst living conditions ever... Tell me when you as a commuter at a ****ty hotel ever had to think about a mortar hitting your tent and blowing your ass to hell and back? And that is even if you get a tent... Do you even know how many nights we spend in some god forsaken hole in the ground? The term Dig-In has real meaning.

We don't complain about QOL, Benefits, or Pay. We are here for a higher cause, I won't wave a flag and say we are here to fight for freedom, and protect the States... Albeit true, however, We are here for our fellow soldiers. We are one. I would gladly die for the man/woman next to me. No matter race, creed, or color.

I say again, We are one. We accomplish missions and tasks that most corporations are envious of... If the pilot group could take something from us, it would be UNITY. Our all for one and one for all mentality, would serve a good purpose for you... However, Some of you dont get it.

You name me one other profession, that you have a very good possibility of getting shot at, blown up, or otherwise hurt for 2,200.00 a month...

My point being, you should never ever, I mean ever compare the Military to a pilot group. We do things you could only imagine. We are a cohesive group. You are a bunch of smaller groups that sometimes work together...

The apples and oranges addage comes into play here. How you can even begin to compare the two, I dont know.

And no, soldiers do not have the right to complain... As a soldier you give up certain rights and privleges... Free speach is one of them. You do as you are told, all the way up. No complaints, no if ands or buts. Do your job. That is all. Everyone has a job, if we all do it, then we survive(mostly) and get to go home. If one person does not do his/her job dozens are in danger. We dont get meetings, votes, or petitions to try and change what we think needs changing...

That is about it, this post kinda long, but nothing like the scalding one I was going to put up.
Read my post again and maybe you will realize that I am on your side. I DON'T THINK TROOPS ARE WHINERS.
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 11:16 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Out
Default

I was simply illustrating flawed logic that some people have on this forum. I am not comparing the two together. I was comparing the reasoning used by other users on this forum to put other people down. I will spell this out for you: If a regional FO is considered a whiner because he complains about his QOL just because he made the decision to become pilot then using that logic that logic anyone unhappy with their job is considered a whiner. I happened to use troops as an example simply because the previous person used it in his/her post.

Don't accuse me of putting your profession down because that's the last thing I intended to do.
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 11:58 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: crj-200 FO
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
Yes, I have 110% support for the troops but it pi$$es me off that our government would rather spend millions on office renovations and other "BS" earmarks than supply our troops with the proper tools necessary to better protect themselves.
Or the millions they pay Blackwater VS paying for our troops to have better equipment. Blackwater uses that money to buy better equipment and pay their "contractors" 3-4 times more then an E-5 with 6yrs makes. In the meantime Marines out there have to field rig their HMMWV from small arms fire some even ordered parts with their own money.

Semper Fi
HMLA-775
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 12:26 PM
  #14  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

As a substitute teacher, I get real sick of listening to 1st and 2nd year teachers complain. 32k a year to start out. every weekend off. week for thanksgiving off. two weeks at christmas off. a week in the spring. 3 months in the summer. oh...and theyre home every night. i get so sick of hearing them joke about "food stamps."
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 01:00 PM
  #15  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,861
Likes: 658
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by daniel0265
Or the millions they pay Blackwater VS paying for our troops to have better equipment. Blackwater uses that money to buy better equipment and pay their "contractors" 3-4 times more then an E-5 with 6yrs makes. In the meantime Marines out there have to field rig their HMMWV from small arms fire some even ordered parts with their own money.

Semper Fi
HMLA-775
Remember those contract soldiers are almost invariably former US military, SOF or at least guys with a lot of combat experience...they are just doing their job, can't really blame them for doing the same 'ol job for a better compensation package.
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 01:42 PM
  #16  
JayDee's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Student Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Rascal
I was simply illustrating flawed logic that some people have on this forum. I am not comparing the two together. I was comparing the reasoning used by other users on this forum to put other people down. I will spell this out for you: If a regional FO is considered a whiner because he complains about his QOL just because he made the decision to become pilot then using that logic that logic anyone unhappy with their job is considered a whiner. I happened to use troops as an example simply because the previous person used it in his/her post.

Don't accuse me of putting your profession down because that's the last thing I intended to do.
Then I digress. My apologies.

SSGT. JayDee
101st Airborne
187th Combat Air Assault "Balls af the Eagle"
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 01:55 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Out
Default

Originally Posted by JayDee
Then I digress. My apologies.

SSGT. JayDee
101st Airborne
187th Combat Air Assault "Balls af the Eagle"
I apologize for any unpleasant feelings that I had caused and thank you for your service.
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 02:20 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Remember those contract soldiers are almost invariably former US military, SOF or at least guys with a lot of combat experience...they are just doing their job, can't really blame them for doing the same 'ol job for a better compensation package.
You are right about their background. They have paid their dues time and again. My feeling (and maybe the other poster's) is that the issue is with the existence of that company -- not the men. Accountability and operation control (or lack thereof) top my list of concerns. It seems that the Rummy-tude was to contract out as much as possible. He was trying to cut/disband the military medical corps -- the wounded would only see contract docs. Why not take the money, grow the force (US military) and properly equip it? Because, just like big corporations, the government would be responsible for the care and retirement of more "employees" and could cost more than paying a subcontractor.
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 03:28 PM
  #19  
Eck4Life's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
As a substitute teacher, I get real sick of listening to 1st and 2nd year teachers complain. 32k a year to start out. every weekend off. week for thanksgiving off. two weeks at christmas off. a week in the spring. 3 months in the summer. oh...and theyre home every night. i get so sick of hearing them joke about "food stamps."

AMEN brother!! And don't forget about all the other federal holidays. Around where I live their benefit packages are outstanding, too. Most put in their 30 years and retire in their early to mid 50s with a pension that pays about 100% of what they were making ($50k +) when they got out. They get that until the day they die and it will never be lost in bankruptcy court. AT MOST, the district just starts reducing the benefit package offered to new hires.

Sorry to go off, but my old neighbors and pretty much everyone in my wife's family are teachers so I get tired of hearing the underpaid/overworked propaganda. My aunt was a teacher and used to b**** about it constantly and decided to hang it up so she join the ranks of the adequately paid office workers. Yeah.....that lasted about a year and a half and she ran back to teaching. Didn't hear too many complaints about it after that. I think that since so many of them have never done anything outside of education they forget how much time they really have off. They graduate from high school and college then immediately start working. They take for granted that not everyone has the entire summer and every holiday in the book off and goes home at 4pm everyday without even asking for it.
Reply
Old 01-28-2009 | 03:32 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: crj-200 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Remember those contract soldiers are almost invariably former US military, SOF or at least guys with a lot of combat experience...they are just doing their job, can't really blame them for doing the same 'ol job for a better compensation package.
My problem with is not with the contractors themselves but the fact that the DOD could have used that money to first properly supply the soldiers. Think of the average soldier in a combat zone. He is under paid and not properly equipt. He then sees a contractor drive by fully armed, equipt and to pour salt on the wound, better paid. This causes soldiers to leave the service and go to the private security field. Further decreasing our military man power, losing good leaders and combat experience soldiers within the military. If the US had excess funds after being able to provide soldiers with better equipment then I would have no objections to contracting out but that has never been the case. Dedicated soldiers that are willing to go to a combat zone for his/her country should not be taken for granted by its leaders with low quality or lack of equipment. And then pay billions to contractor companies that use the same money to buy top rated equipment for their contractors and still turn a HUGE profit. Something in this just doesn't add up.

Semper Fi
HMLA-775
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
careerpilot
Fractional
76
01-01-2009 04:54 PM
whtever
Regional
110
12-15-2008 09:12 PM
Denny Crane
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
12-09-2008 03:48 AM
forgot to bid
Major
15
11-25-2008 09:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices