Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
STATUE of LIBERTY FLY BY >

STATUE of LIBERTY FLY BY

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

STATUE of LIBERTY FLY BY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2009 | 03:32 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: in line at the ticket counter
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer
From a security standpoint, I wouldn't want people (i.e. potentially bad guys) to know that this was going to be happening. I agree with the Air Force. The people will get over this in about two seconds.

If it's a security issue then maybe they shouldn't do it for a photo op. Use photo shop and save my tax money!
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 04:00 PM
  #12  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by GRDHound
If it's a security issue then maybe they shouldn't do it for a photo op. Use photo shop and save my tax money!
Yes - it is a security issue. If we can't have our Presidential Aircraft fly by our Statue of Liberty for a photo op - then the terrorists really did already win didn't they?

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 04:15 PM
  #13  
New Hire
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

People of New York City can answer you on this one. It was stupid, and shouldn't have been done period.
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 04:16 PM
  #14  
navigatro's Avatar
Permanent Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Yes - it is a security issue. If we can't have our Presidential Aircraft fly by our Statue of Liberty for a photo op - then the terrorists really did already win didn't they?

USMCFLYR

You can't really be serious about trying to defend the Air Force on this one.

They are going to take a lot of heat, and deservedly so.

This is not a security issue. It is a (lack of) public relations issue.
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 04:22 PM
  #15  
supersix-4's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Reserve on tha Beach
Default

The President CAN and WILL do alot of things that not everyone will agree with.
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 04:29 PM
  #16  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 51
From: Legacy FO
Default

Originally Posted by fokkersauras
People of New York City can answer you on this one. It was stupid, and shouldn't have been done period.
It wasn't stupid. I wonder if it is the first fly-by of the SOL since 9-11? I bet you that it is not.
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 04:32 PM
  #17  
navigatro's Avatar
Permanent Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by supersix-4
The President CAN and WILL do alot of things that not everyone will agree with.

My guess is that the President had nothing to do with this.

It was a photo op for an FAA video.
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 06:16 PM
  #18  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by navigatro
You can't really be serious about trying to defend the Air Force on this one.

They are going to take a lot of heat, and deservedly so.

This is not a security issue. It is a (lack of) public relations issue.
Yes - I am absolutely defending the SECURITY portion of why advance **warning** to the public wasn't provided. So....you don't see a security issue with telling the whole world that a B-747 (and not just any B-747) is going to be flying circles at low level? Am I defending the AF or the White House or whomever? I don't know - I said it was a security issue. I also said that if we have come to a point that we can't have a photo op then the terrorists really have won.
It seems that the White House has already given an apology. It may have been a public relations blunder, but the security issue was necessary IMO.

USMCFLYR

Last edited by USMCFLYR; 04-27-2009 at 08:11 PM.
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 07:07 PM
  #19  
AZFlyer's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Navigatro
You can't really be serious about trying to defend the Air Force on this one.

They are going to take a lot of heat, and deservedly so.

This is not a security issue. It is a (lack of) public relations issue.
You can't really be serious that it isn't a security issue. It should be quite obvious why you wouldn't be blatantly advertising this photo op publicly. I highly doubt that the AF/government didn't expect some sort of stink would be raised by the public who witnessed the fly-by, but that potential for a small public outcry was justifiably decided not a large enough factor to outweigh the issue of maintaining a secure environment in which to operate this special aircraft.

I expect that the 'concerned' public will have forgotten all about it very quickly.
Reply
Old 04-27-2009 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
Default

There was NO reason to do this. Computer Graphics could have save A LOT of gas. I think the "carbon footprint" for this flight kicked us all in the @ss.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
Lowlevel
Regional
31
04-21-2009 11:28 AM
PearlPilot
Money Talk
5
03-11-2009 08:55 AM
Mason32
Hangar Talk
8
02-07-2009 07:30 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
51
12-12-2008 11:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices