Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1696204)

You don't know what your hands are going to do once you go to sleep! That's why I always tighten up my belt and cram both of my hands down the front of my pants when I take a nap on a plane, especially if I'm sitting next to a 17yr. old girl.

That way, when I wake up, I'm only fondling myself!

Originally Posted by thevagabond (Post 1696015)

Not looking to start one either. It's just that you have to admit you join a lot of the RAH threads and contribute a lot of anti RAH sentiments. Herman was chiming in on a CHQ thread and I just assumed it was you critiquing all things RAH again. I'm certainly no RAH lifer but I also appreciate everything I've gotten from here and all the opportunities I have as a result of the experiences I've acquired here. Not to mention all the growth I've experienced both personally and professionally. I'm just sick of all the whining and negativity. The system is what it is and we all accepted a job knowing the conditions and rules. Thankfully my parents raised me better than to complain and feel sorry for myself for being paid what I agreed to and for working under work rules I also agreed to. And no, I'm not one of the 15% who voted yes. I'm all for leaving this a better place than I came to. Have a good day.

Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1696204)

You don't know what your hands are going to do once you go to sleep! That's why I always tighten up my belt and cram both of my hands down the front of my pants when I take a nap on a plane, especially if I'm sitting next to a 17yr. old girl.

That way, when I wake up, I'm only fondling myself!

Originally Posted by cardiomd (Post 1695774)

Captain Groper is not the tool today.

Pilot sentenced for groping teenage girl on flight

U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball is, for ruining this guy's life.

Originally Posted by RhinoPherret (Post 1696781)

Not buying this guy’s lame excuse.

The immediate words and actions taken when the incident occurred by him, his further ramblings later after the incident, the canned responses by his attorney (his attorney obviously had nothing to work with to enforce this guy's innocent pleading). Couple this with his statement in court: "Whatever the sentence is, I will accept it". That is the standard statement to make in court (he was advised by his attorney to make it) when you know you are guilty and could go down for some serious time.

Originally Posted by RhinoPherret (Post 1696781)

Not buying this guy’s lame excuse.

The immediate words and actions taken when the incident occurred by him, his further ramblings later after the incident, the canned responses by his attorney (his attorney obviously had nothing to work with to enforce this guy's innocent pleading). Couple this with his statement in court: "Whatever the sentence is, I will accept it". That is the standard statement to make in court (he was advised by his attorney to make it) when you know you are guilty and could go down for some serious time.

Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1697029)

The canned responses by his attorney? Oh yes, let's definately use that to determine guilt. In fact, anyone who "lawyers up" is probably guilty, right?

Saying he will accept a sentence, after being told to say that, is also an indicator of guilt? Would it have helped "prove his innocence" (should that even be a thing anyway?) if he had said "nah, I don't accept the results of the court, so I'm just walking out"?

So someone accuses someone of something, we just better assume guilt and prosecute, convict and punish accordingly because hey, if they were innocent they wouldn't have been charged in the first place, right?