Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Horizon Air
How does AA/Express/Skywest/Horizon get into KASE during times with low ceilings? >

How does AA/Express/Skywest/Horizon get into KASE during times with low ceilings?

Search
Notices
Horizon Air Regional Airline

How does AA/Express/Skywest/Horizon get into KASE during times with low ceilings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2009, 05:54 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
samstanton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pilot
Posts: 26
Default How does AA/Express/Skywest/Horizon get into KASE during times with low ceilings?

As I was sitting in KASE waiting for passengers I saw a CRJ landed straight in runway 15 when ATIS was calling 1500 OVC. What special rules do you guys have to shot this approach, let alone land from straight in?
samstanton is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:00 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by samstanton View Post
As I was sitting in KASE waiting for passengers I saw a CRJ landed straight in runway 15 when ATIS was calling 1500 OVC. What special rules do you guys have to shot this approach, let alone land from straight in?
Sam -

Unless I'm reading some in your post wrong; there doiesn't seem to be any problem with a 1,500' overcast condition (better than basic VFR of 1000/3) and a straight-in landing is probably the easiest of any approach.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:08 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
samstanton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pilot
Posts: 26
Default

the LOC DME-E requires 2200-3 for Category B and I would bet the airlines are flying faster than we are.
samstanton is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:12 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by samstanton View Post
the LOC DME-E requires 2200-3 for Category B and I would bet the airlines are flying faster than we are.
AH...I see - a question about the mins on the approach. Well...I cant help you much there. I had to look up the airport identifier. I've never flown into Aspen, but I thought the basis for your question might have been along those lines. I agree about the approach speed though. I'll assume that they would be a Cat C aircraft, but I'm sure you'll get some good answers on here.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:23 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by samstanton View Post
the LOC DME-E requires 2200-3 for Category B and I would bet the airlines are flying faster than we are.
Airlines are allowed to shoot the approach as long as they have the required visibility. Ceiling does not prevent them from shooting the approach. Perhaps the ceiling being reported was a thin layer that could be seen thru. As long as you have the required visibility, airport enviornment in sight, and in continuous position to land, you should be good to go.


It has been over a year since I shot an approach there, but from what I remember visibility was usually the more restricting factor.
rahc is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:28 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by rahc View Post
Airlines are allowed to shoot the approach as long as they have the required visibility. Ceiling does not prevent them from shooting the approach. Perhaps the ceiling being reported was a thin layer that could be seen thru. As long as you have the required visibility, airport enviornment in sight, and in continuous position to land, you should be good to go.


It has been over a year since I shot an approach there, but from what I remember visibility was usually the more restricting factor.
I forgot this rahc. I just learned this yesterday matter of fact. I was talking to a former military guy who is now flying fractional and he mentioned the visibility requirement and said that it was one of the things that was hard for him to get use too.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:28 PM
  #7  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Ceilings are not controlling. You can shoot the approach as long as you have the required VISIBILITY. Keep in mind that just because the ATIS is reporting 015 OVC, that doesn't mean that an aircraft couldn't gain sight of the runway environment at a higher altitude. Ceilings could be higher then reported in some areas, as WX moves/changes.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:29 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by rahc View Post
Airlines are allowed to shoot the approach as long as they have the required visibility. Ceiling does not prevent them from shooting the approach. Perhaps the ceiling being reported was a thin layer that could be seen thru. As long as you have the required visibility, airport enviornment in sight, and in continuous position to land, you should be good to go.


It has been over a year since I shot an approach there, but from what I remember visibility was usually the more restricting factor.
I would have to look at the plate, however it has been visibility is determining and ceilings are considered since as long as I can remember.

AA
AAflyer is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:39 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CRJ1000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: B-747-400/8
Posts: 146
Cool Kase

We do the special LOC DME 15. It has an MDA of 8780. We need "3 miles" to be cleared. We have 5 step down fixes and cross DBL at 14000 with gear down and flaps 30. The miss is at 3.9 DME. Inside that we have a "Balked Landing" procedure. T/O of on 33 requires 1 mile and 400 ft. ceiling. We operate from 7 AM til 11 PM. Flights to DEN, ORD, LAX, SFO for the UA side and SLC and ATL for DL.
The LYNX Dash and MESA Dash only need 2 miles I believe, but our MDA is lower.
We love holding over DBL as GA and 135 guys shoot the VOR and go missed. Every min. that goes by we get paid more
Hope this helps.
CRJ1000 is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:56 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
samstanton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pilot
Posts: 26
Default

CRJ100 great answer! It was pretty sweet seeing RJ's appear out of the clouds. We needed 4200 for company OPS but the weather quickly deteriorated as we waited for passengers. It was a pretty fun approach. Thanks for taking the mystery out of it. Hope to try your approach soon.
samstanton is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirDriver
Major
25
01-18-2009 04:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices