![]() |
.....in other news, I canmot wait for July 27th to come, so we can be a united pilot group again.....
|
Originally Posted by seekingblue
(Post 2633179)
.....in other news, I canmot wait for July 27th to come, so we can be a united pilot group again.....
|
Originally Posted by seekingblue
(Post 2633179)
.....in other news, I canmot wait for July 27th to come, so we can be a united pilot group again.....
|
Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
(Post 2630826)
I dont recall advising anyone on their vote, but operate as you will BD.
I am funny, I know. Thanks for that.:) Bozo blocks people because he is so opinionated and he can't get a grip when people oppose him. This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2633080)
Yep, millions start a new business... What's the statistical success rate of a new business?
Whats the safety net you propose that will help with housing and food for their family for the very high percentage of start-ups that fail after they sink their life savings into their "swing for the fences"? In our healthcare system, how is a new business startup going to provide/fund healthcare for his/her family on the individual market during the very lean start-up years? Sorry, we are all entitled to our "opinion". But I think it's obvious that the majority of jobs available are not "good" jobs, no matter how educated the average American is and starting your own "start-up" is not a practical solution for the masses for a multitude of reasons. Possible yes, practical for the masses, nope. Right now, there's many service sector jobs that are not designed or meant to support a family. In fact, few jobs can even if there's modestly paying jobs. The equation behind this is quite complex:
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2633213)
.......#metoo
BD, I almost forgot to mention a personal hero of mine... Mike Rowe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Rowe Please look at some of his network news interviews. He's a working class hero, particularly in his TV shows that teach us about personal responsibility, hard work, humility, and what the American worker can do for an honorable living. Contrast what you see there to many of the socialism ills of our society. http://aquaticaviation.net/wp-conten...we-cropped.png This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. |
Originally Posted by seekingblue
(Post 2633179)
.....in other news, I canmot wait for July 27th to come, so we can be a united pilot group again.....
Can't tell if this is a play on words or just plain sarcasm. Either way, well played. |
Originally Posted by queue
(Post 2633270)
Right now, there's many service sector jobs that are not designed or meant to support a family. In fact, few jobs can even if there's modestly paying jobs. The equation behind this is quite complex:
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. Lots of ideological stuff, but practically speaking misses the previous conversation. For instance, you say they should not lose all their money on a start-up and should have lots of cash saved up before going out on their own... Ok, but we were talking about how most available jobs are very low wage jobs. So, how is someone supposed to get a job that supports their life AND allows for significant savings to be amassed to have a good individual safety net prior to starting their own company? And I might have missed it, but what is the average success rate of a new business again? Healthcare, you can make your ideological argument about slavery all you want, but for most it's an expensive necessity and now you are saying the solution to our over abundance of low paying jobs (and proportional scarcity of good paying jobs) for the masses is to get an available low paying job, and while supporting your current life needs, amass a very large safety net of money to support your new company through the lean years (assuming it doesn't fail, which statistically, it probably will) while showing your rugged individualism by funding your family healthcare. All from an existing available low wage job. Yep, that should work for the masses, can't see any way for that plan to go wrong. |
Originally Posted by queue
(Post 2633274)
BD, I almost forgot to mention a personal hero of mine... Mike Rowe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Rowe Please look at some of his network news interviews. He's a working class hero, particularly in his TV shows that teach us about personal responsibility, hard work, humility, and what the American worker can do for an honorable living. Contrast what you see there to many of the socialism ills of our society. http://aquaticaviation.net/wp-conten...we-cropped.png This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. |
Originally Posted by seekingblue
(Post 2633179)
.....in other news, I canmot wait for July 27th to come, so we can be a united pilot group again.....
|
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2633415)
At the rate things are going, we're on track to resemble the American pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2633415)
At the rate things are going, we're on track to resemble the American pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2633415)
At the rate things are going, we're on track to resemble the American pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2633415)
At the rate things are going, we're on track to resemble the American pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 2633500)
Pretty much. It’s so stupid.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2633541)
After the 27th things will begin to improve within the group notably. Not everyone, but it will get much better over time.
As I said in an another post this is just another bona fides for some of our loudmouths to cling to. I’m a bus pilot I’m in a rebel base I voted no. You see it on bluepilots. No doubt all airlines have this issue but the company will dork up implantation and they will be there to say SEE I TOLD YOU. Kind of like what you do :) I don’t know I just don’t see it getting better. I wish the LGB guys would have just voted yes and explained it like the Boston guys did that the timeline sucked but the TA was solid. Now we have a split group among the LEC. Maybe I’m just feeling pessimistic today. What would help is if this contract does what the union says it will about QOL but those (no)dudes will still be ****ed and continue dealing in hypotheticals. |
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 2633559)
I don’t share your optimistic appraisal of the situation (name that movie)
As I said in an another post this is just another bona fides for some of our loudmouths to cling to. I’m a bus pilot I’m in a rebel base I voted no. You see it on bluepilots. No doubt all airlines have this issue but the company will dork up implantation and they will be there to say SEE I TOLD YOU. Kind of like what you do :) I don’t know I just don’t see it getting better. I wish the LGB guys would have just voted yes and explained it like the Boston guys did that the timeline sucked but the TA was solid. Now we have a split group among the LEC. Maybe I’m just feeling pessimistic today. What would help is if this contract does what the union says it will about QOL but those (no)dudes will still be ****ed and continue dealing in hypotheticals. Or maybe the BOS guys should have voted no and sent the thing back. I'm not optimistic either. If this thing passes 70-30, the healing will be quicker...if it's 50s to 40s, I think the frustration and divide goes on a lot longer.... |
I wish that they had. In the best negotiating environment in years, we shouldn’t be taking concessions.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2633406)
I might read the rest when I have a few hours to kill...
Lots of ideological stuff, but practically speaking misses the previous conversation. For instance, you say they should not lose all their money on a start-up and should have lots of cash saved up before going out on their own... Ok, but we were talking about how most available jobs are very low wage jobs. So, how is someone supposed to get a job that supports their life AND allows for significant savings to be amassed to have a good individual safety net prior to starting their own company? And I might have missed it, but what is the average success rate of a new business again? Healthcare, you can make your ideological argument about slavery all you want, but for most it's an expensive necessity and now you are saying the solution to our over abundance of low paying jobs (and proportional scarcity of good paying jobs) for the masses is to get an available low paying job, and while supporting your current life needs, amass a very large safety net of money to support your new company through the lean years (assuming it doesn't fail, which statistically, it probably will) while showing your rugged individualism by funding your family healthcare. All from an existing available low wage job. Yep, that should work for the masses, can't see any way for that plan to go wrong. It's pretty clear that there will be a few generations that will be misplaced. That is the inevitable consequence of the leftist-ideology that has plagued this country since the 1950s and 1960s. Like the flu, things will have to get worse before they get better. It will take generations for cultures to evolve past needing to be dependent on centralized government. We have to re-engineer schools so they are useful and relevant again. We need to redo government so that it's more accountable to local control (smaller federal government). We need to stop with handouts and other social welfare systems because it only gives us San Francisco with poop & needles and the miles long Skid Row of L.A... and Detroit the warzone... oh and NYC... which is all of the aforementioned. People need to learn to think on their own rather than letting political party controlled media networks do the thinking for them. We even need a monetary system like Bitcoin with a Blockchain like system that prevents governments and private companies (e.g. the Federal Reserve) from creating inflation from printing money out of thin air. That's the only real way to fix things. People will suffer. But, that's the price of people's complacency from their 1st world lives. Sadly I don't think we're going to get a system overnight that is just and fair. Incidentally, I agree with Trump's trade war because it's leveling the playing field for these people who have failed businesses. It's not fair that we pay an extra 30-40% to sell in other countries while they enjoy no or little tariffs selling in the USA. Likewise, I agree with him that we shouldn't be subsidizing Europe's defense while they get rich being in bed with Russia in trade for an oil pipeline. Make them pay their fair share for NATO so that money can come back here. But, no one is *entitled* to health care. It's not a right. It's a service and you can't force it from anyone. Sadly life isn't fair. I work in animal rescue and I get to see the worst that humanity inflicts on the truly innocent. I wish it weren't so. But, I don't exist in order to make up for the injustices of the universe. If people have low wage jobs, they can change it. Go back 100-200 years and even people now without healthcare still get it a million times better than even the wealthy had back then. That's human progress from the capitalistic system of economy we have coupled with the freedom loving Constitutional republic we have. It allows that one guy who had the special magic to discover, invent, and market something that makes the world a better place. It isn't perfect but it certainly is the best system ever devised in the history of human existence. No where in there did I ever agree to subsidize someone else's subsistence by force of law. About getting savings to start a company... it doesn't take much to start a company. This is something I know A LOT about since I own a few. You can literally go from off the street to being a millionaire. It just depends on whether you have the business sense to find a niche to fill. It depends on your individual discipline, desire, creativity, brains, and motivation. I have a personal acquaintance who went from jail to be a millionaire by starting a wrecker company. He couldn't get high powered jobs like you and me, and he didn't have the education, so he worked construction jobs as a laborer. He saved pennies enough to buy a wrecker and got his construction friends to work for him. He now owns about 20 wreckers and makes millions every year. Similarly, I used to date a really hot girl who never went to college, grew up as a Mennonite. She worked with a smart guy who set up a website to sell things and she grew the business from a small, obscure online store into a really big one. She too is a multi-millionaire now. Obviously not everyone succeeds, but it's no one's fault but their own if they don't. They're not victims... no one is out there ensuring the vast majority of people can't succeed. Most people fail because of their own defeatist attitudes (e.g. like BJ pilots who accept a bad contract because they don't know any better). This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. |
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2633415)
At the rate things are going, we're on track to resemble the American pilot group.
It's also a great opportunity to finally breed a culture of professionalism in the BJ pilot group. We could eliminate the Regional Mentality. Change is not always bad. The only real risk is posed from a bad contract - like what American has. This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. |
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 2633629)
I wish that they had. In the best negotiating environment in years, we shouldn’t be taking concessions.
|
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2633662)
I'm sorry, but what are you talking about? Do you honestly think that the TA is worse than what we currently have? That's what "concessions" means.
Perhaps you should read the reference to the Dependability Policy (via the Commuter Policy) and the part about Positive Contact. They are worse than before. This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations. |
Today 08:36 PM by queue This message is hidden because queue is on your ignore list. |
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 2633629)
I wish that they had. In the best negotiating environment in years, we shouldn’t be taking concessions.
|
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2633662)
I'm sorry, but what are you talking about? Do you honestly think that the TA is worse than what we currently have? That's what "concessions" means.
|
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 2633704)
For me personally, in my situation... yes.
Same......... |
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2628043)
The consensus estimate for 2018 is less than 3% even with soaring debt.
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2628043)
At what 'data' are you looking? You must be looking at quarterly numbers that vary seasonally because no annual forecasts have the US GDP > 3% even with the exploding debt to GDP ratio.
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 2631981)
False again
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/gold...dp-growth.html Even Goldman sachs now think gdp will be above 4% for q2. |
Originally Posted by queue
(Post 2633655)
We need to stop with handouts and other social welfare systems because it only gives us San Francisco with poop & needles and the miles long Skid Row of L.A... and Detroit the warzone... oh and NYC... which is all of the aforementioned.
Your ridiculous rugged individual chest-puffing isn't fooling anyone, not even yourself which is probably the underlying intent. Good luck with that. |
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 2633559)
I don’t share your optimistic appraisal of the situation (name that movie)
|
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 2633559)
I don’t share your optimistic appraisal of the situation (name that movie)
As I said in an another post this is just another bona fides for some of our loudmouths to cling to. I’m a bus pilot I’m in a rebel base I voted no. You see it on bluepilots. No doubt all airlines have this issue but the company will dork up *****implantation****# and they will be there to say SEE I TOLD YOU. Kind of like what you do :) I don’t know I just don’t see it getting better. I wish the LGB guys would have just voted yes and explained it like the Boston guys did that the timeline sucked but the TA was solid. Now we have a split group among the LEC. Maybe I’m just feeling pessimistic today. What would help is if this contract does what the union says it will about QOL but those (no)dudes will still be ****ed and continue dealing in hypotheticals. 😁 Yeah, the 27 guys on BP won't get over it, the rest will mostly move on I think. |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 2633579)
Or maybe the BOS guys should have voted no and sent the thing back.
I'm not optimistic either. If this thing passes 70-30, the healing will be quicker...if it's 50s to 40s, I think the frustration and divide goes on a lot longer.... |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2633815)
Freud wants his slip back...
😁 Yeah, the 27 guys on BP won't get over it, the rest will mostly move on I think. Well the company would dork that up as well. I wonder if it’s coverd under insurance? Stupid autocorrect or stupid writer :) Let’s hope so but like f16 said it needs to be a big win. |
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 2633704)
For me personally, in my situation... yes.
|
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2633847)
You can't look at only one thing, ignoring the rest, and say it's concessionary. If all things remained equal, and your pay remained flat, I would agree. But instead you get scope, dramatically improved work rules, etc. Yes, you're losing PTO sellback. But that's not the only thing in the CBA. On the whole it's a big improvement, which is why it's going to pass by 65-70%.
And don't tell me the vacation rules are worth it. Do we need more vacation allotment at times of the year when it pays to take vacation? Absolutely! Do we need scope? Absofreakinglutely. But I survived our crappy first year pay (the one thing in this contract that I do believe that they got 100 percent right) and I am finally in a position where I can really make some dough... and now I get to go backwards! Oh, and we have taken 3-4 mini vacations each year for the last two years. |
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 2633837)
And the MCO guys and 2 JFK guys and a FLL guy.
Yep. Them too. I've always said if the MEC wrapped up the PEA in the form of a TA that 35-40% of this pilot group would have still voted for it. I had always hoped that we had 2 layers to protect us from ourselves--that the NC would never bring us a substandard AIP and if they did, the MEC would never let it get to the pilot group. Fail. Fail. |
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2633847)
You can't look at only one thing, ignoring the rest, and say it's concessionary. If all things remained equal, and your pay remained flat, I would agree. But instead you get scope, dramatically improved work rules, etc. Yes, you're losing PTO sellback. But that's not the only thing in the CBA. On the whole it's a big improvement, which is why it's going to pass by 65-70%.
For you, it's an improvement. I lose money and days off with this TA. It's concessionary. Period, dot. I'm glad there were many fixes, particularly with some of the pairing constructions and daily credit which helps the junior guys more. I never expected a pay raise out of this, mainly because of the PTOSB. I was fine with that. What I didn't expect was to take a substantial pay cut and have to work 2-3 more days a month. Add on top of that vacation alllotment, no UTS, PS cliff, bottom of peer pay rates, COLA, should I go on? This is a bottom of the barrel TA which will keep us trailing our peers for the next 5-7 years. And when we got to mediation next time, the mediator is going to say, "Hey, you guys accepted bottom last time, guess where I expect you to accept this time?" Precedence will have been set. My only hope to finish my career at a real airline with a pilot group that fights for its worth is to hope like hell we merge. |
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2633847)
On the whole it's a big improvement, which is why it's going to pass by 65-70%.
This is the most pathetic pilot group I have ever worked with! |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 2633880)
For you, it's an improvement. I lose money and days off with this TA. It's concessionary. Period, dot.
I'm glad there were many fixes, particularly with some of the pairing constructions and daily credit which helps the junior guys more. I never expected a pay raise out of this, mainly because of the PTOSB. I was fine with that. What I didn't expect was to take a substantial pay cut and have to work 2-3 more days a month. Add on top of that vacation alllotment, no UTS, PS cliff, bottom of peer pay rates, COLA, should I go on? This is a bottom of the barrel TA which will keep us trailing our peers for the next 5-7 years. And when we got to mediation next time, the mediator is going to say, "Hey, you guys accepted bottom last time, guess where I expect you to accept this time?" Precedence will have been set. My only hope to finish my career at a real airline with a pilot group that fights for its worth is to hope like hell we merge. The PTO sellback people are in the minority (myself included). If I want to monetize my vacation, I can do so by flying over it. |
Originally Posted by capt707
(Post 2633906)
OMG! If I hear that crap from one more guy.... “but it’s an improvement to what we have now”..... well no sh!t! It is suppose to be an improvement, doesn’t mean you have to vote yes just because it is better than the crap PEA and FSM we worked under for so long.
This is the most pathetic pilot group I have ever worked with! |
Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
(Post 2633870)
Now we are even losing EPS pay on reserve and thats sure to cost me too.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:32 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands