Earnings Call / TA Talk
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
#43
Pre-tax loss of $160 million, inclusive of the E190 asset impairment charge ($319 million impairment charge).
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Pre-tax loss of $160 million, inclusive of the E190 asset impairment charge ($319 million impairment charge).
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
#45
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 5
From: CA
Pre-tax loss of $160 million, inclusive of the E190 asset impairment charge ($319 million impairment charge).
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
One would have to be tone deaf though to disregard the signs brought up yesterday though. It's like your fingers are in your ears, you just don't want to hear what they're saying.
It took us 3 years to get here with consistently positive outlooks. We're hitting some choppy water, last quarter and next and now, now you think we're really going to exact every last penny we feel we're owed? I'm glad our union at least has the big picture in mind, it's about getting the best deal you can while you can get it.
#46
Banned
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Pre-tax loss of $160 million, inclusive of the E190 asset impairment charge ($319 million impairment charge).
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
You all realize we don't normally include a "Special Item" loss of $319,000,000 every quarter, right? Our fuel cost for the quarter was $491,000,000 which is our biggest operating expense. So, if you add in an addition $319,000,000 .... then yes, you will show a "loss" for the quarter.
The sky is not falling.
I am sure it has nothing to do with our amazing (for the company) contract.
You guys do realize that new airplanes and scary earnings reports are straight out of the F&H playbook right?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



