Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
What staffing increase? >

What staffing increase?

Search

Notices

What staffing increase?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2018 | 04:44 AM
  #21  
Thread Starter
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by SmitteyB
Although I find BlueDriver a very unhappy person and often shake my head at his posts, the staffing numbers do not add up.

Unless they have found with these new pairings that the overall pilots required for the operation is less than anticipated, it doesn’t make sense. Makes you wonder what kind of staffing model they have developed. More telling will be the December bid.
Not that it really matters, it's the internet's, but if you really knew me you would laugh at the thought that I'm an unhappy person. Literally couldn't be further from the truth.

But, yeah, I'm not sunshine and roses about JB.
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 04:47 AM
  #22  
Thread Starter
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Southerner
Pure speculation here, but I'm betting that they are being cautious because large bids give the ability for large amounts of transfers from E190 to A320. A large bid could drive a huge increase in training cycles. If they keep the bids on the small side, fewer people can jump over all at once, which helps to keep the training department from getting overwhelmed.

If that is the case, the bids have less to do with staffing needs, and more to do with damage control.
Ok, control damage. Then how do they ACTUALLY staff the deliveries and the airline with the required number of pilots then?
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 05:09 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Ok, control damage. Then how do they ACTUALLY staff the deliveries and the airline with the required number of pilots then?
Are they allowed to put new hires in an aircraft that doesn’t have a system bid vacancy for it?
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 05:25 AM
  #24  
Thread Starter
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
Are they allowed to put new hires in an aircraft that doesn’t have a system bid vacancy for it?
That was my thought. Not sure, hope our "Industry leading" contract language prevents that type of shannanagans...
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 05:55 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
Are they allowed to put new hires in an aircraft that doesn’t have a system bid vacancy for it?
Supplemental bid maybe? Dunno.
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 08:53 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
Are they allowed to put new hires in an aircraft that doesn’t have a system bid vacancy for it?
I think they have done this in the past (for FO vacancies) and I don't see anything in the contract preventing this. Maybe the October and November new hire classes there are suddenly only airbus spots open... Makes sense if they're trying to reduce training events, unfortunately.
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 09:16 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mattio
I think they have done this in the past (for FO vacancies) and I don't see anything in the contract preventing this. Maybe the October and November new hire classes there are suddenly only airbus spots open... Makes sense if they're trying to reduce training events, unfortunately.
Such bull crap. Another reason I’m glad I voted no... new hires should only be able to fill open vacancy spots.
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 10:01 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
Such bull crap. Another reason I’m glad I voted no... new hires should only be able to fill open vacancy spots.
Ya, it wasn't really an issue before. If you wanted to switch to the airbus, you could pretty much do it but the new pay rates changes things (: transitions go senior probably and the company tries to prevent a flood of transition training.)
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 12:21 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by IQuitEagle
You actually think that would change things, with the management you have? 😂😂😂
Yeah when the schedule start costing more money yes

I fully understand our management.

I know things are amazing at FedEx glad you made it out.
Reply
Old 09-07-2018 | 12:23 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by Mattio
Ya, it wasn't really an issue before. If you wanted to switch to the airbus, you could pretty much do it but the new pay rates changes things (: transitions go senior probably and the company tries to prevent a flood of transition training.)

I’m sure they will do whatever they can to minimize training costs and try to keep things moving down there.

They can barely keep up with stuff as it is.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetstream 823JS
PSA Airlines
157
03-21-2016 02:53 PM
Sunvox
United
12
09-27-2013 05:32 AM
PilotAnalyst
Major
0
11-19-2012 01:46 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
0
06-16-2005 12:40 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-21-2005 03:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices