CBA is a TURD
07-16-2019 | 10:09 PM
#32
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 2
From: B757F CA
Last edited by IQuitEagle; 07-16-2019 at 10:52 PM.
07-17-2019 | 03:57 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
That goes both ways. If we're in a recession during negotiations for the next CBA the union will be the one to drag things out.
07-17-2019 | 05:25 AM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
We got what we got. It’s certainly not the worst but there’s room for improvement. Hopefully we’ll do better next round.
The implementation time line is quickly coming to an end. Can’t wait for the arbitration hearing when our “partners” miss the deadline.
07-17-2019 | 05:46 AM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
It’s entirely speculation from either side of the fence at this point.
We got what we got. It’s certainly not the worst but there’s room for improvement. Hopefully we’ll do better next round.
The implementation time line is quickly coming to an end. Can’t wait for the arbitration hearing when our “partners” miss the deadline.
We got what we got. It’s certainly not the worst but there’s room for improvement. Hopefully we’ll do better next round.
The implementation time line is quickly coming to an end. Can’t wait for the arbitration hearing when our “partners” miss the deadline.
This CBA was built from the ground up. You either trust the mec/nc or you dont. Hopin the loudmouth 26ers volunteer for the next round and get us DAL+3.
07-17-2019 | 06:21 AM
#36
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
The company has zero incentive to amended it.
This pilot group for nearly two decades has proven it will settle: every time for anything.
Once the “wait” drags on this pilot group will rush to settle so they can get ‘em the next “next time”.
07-17-2019 | 06:26 AM
#37
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 5
From: CA
I feel bad for the NC guys who had to listen to our “real experts.”
07-17-2019 | 06:42 AM
#38
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
If the NC said this is the best we could get and it up to the pilot group now.
That would have been honest.
Instead we got a presentation of exaggerations meant to do only one thing. Pass a product.
Zero respect for that. That is why they were fired by the LECs.
That would have been honest.
Instead we got a presentation of exaggerations meant to do only one thing. Pass a product.
Zero respect for that. That is why they were fired by the LECs.
07-17-2019 | 06:52 AM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Which NC personnel have you spoken to? Or is this just pure conjecture?
07-17-2019 | 07:50 AM
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
There’s also zero evidence that we wouldn’t still be negotiating contract 2.0.
The only thing that’s for sure is that implementation would definitely not have happened any sooner. I’d say it’s also a safe bet that the recent staffing increase would not have happened.
The only thing that’s for sure is that implementation would definitely not have happened any sooner. I’d say it’s also a safe bet that the recent staffing increase would not have happened.
Exactly right but they can play in theory and we are stuck with facts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
