New reserve grids
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,188
We'll see how the grievance goes before we blame the union entirely, and I agree the language is loose and not good enough.
However, the language does not REQUIRE the company to interpret it this way, and it doesn't REQUIRE the company treat a SWAP as a DROP. The company is CHOOSING to do that intentionally.
Think about that and remember who ultimately is CHOOSING to ruin your QOL.
However, the language does not REQUIRE the company to interpret it this way, and it doesn't REQUIRE the company treat a SWAP as a DROP. The company is CHOOSING to do that intentionally.
Think about that and remember who ultimately is CHOOSING to ruin your QOL.
#12
Clear ECAM
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 886
This really is the issue. The problem could be fixed overnight with a FLICA update with zero detriment to the operation. They’re making an asinine interpretation of the provision.
#13
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
To expand on that even further, the company is CHOOSING to interpret the language in the worst possible way, to get guys to turn against their union, because it helps them weaken the union.
Ultimately the union NC failed to recognize the holes in this language, but they did not intentionally sell your QOL. But the company is intentionally ruining your QOL. Remember that important distinction.
Ultimately the union NC failed to recognize the holes in this language, but they did not intentionally sell your QOL. But the company is intentionally ruining your QOL. Remember that important distinction.
#14
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Shame.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,188
I was very disappointed in them pushing this turd of a contract out and now they reap the rewards of their sub par contract. I’ll always support the union over the company but still doesn’t mean I have to be happy with the current mec etc
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
This is divide and conquer.
Company: look this is what you guys agreed to it’s what the contract says. Blame alpa.
Pilot: well WTF? Alpa sucks. How’s they let this happen.
Company: put out another premium open time bucket(hehehe watch those guys pick it up)
Pilots: you violated the contract!!
Company: you guys picked it up?
This is union busting 101.
Company: look this is what you guys agreed to it’s what the contract says. Blame alpa.
Pilot: well WTF? Alpa sucks. How’s they let this happen.
Company: put out another premium open time bucket(hehehe watch those guys pick it up)
Pilots: you violated the contract!!
Company: you guys picked it up?
This is union busting 101.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
We'll see how the grievance goes before we blame the union entirely, and I agree the language is loose and not good enough.
However, the language does not REQUIRE the company to interpret it this way, and it doesn't REQUIRE the company treat a SWAP as a DROP. The company is CHOOSING to do that intentionally.
Think about that and remember who ultimately is CHOOSING to ruin your QOL.
However, the language does not REQUIRE the company to interpret it this way, and it doesn't REQUIRE the company treat a SWAP as a DROP. The company is CHOOSING to do that intentionally.
Think about that and remember who ultimately is CHOOSING to ruin your QOL.
I’m not talking about adding a three day over a two day. That is going against the reserve balancing algorithm. Same footprint swaps are being interpreted by the company correctly. Straight from the scheduling committee.
Look I’m a volunteer and a very strong supporter of the union. But this was a major screw up that is very negatively effecting people’s QOL. I pay dues which gives me the right to question and point out problems and mistakes made.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post