Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
New Medical Shenanigans >

New Medical Shenanigans

Search
Notices

New Medical Shenanigans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2021, 06:20 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes View Post
Honestly, I'd much rather have the second opinion from the mayo clinic. If it could save me from an unnecessary spinal surgery (and all the issues that go with it) vs other effective medical treatments, I'm all for it.
Quite often, surgery isn't the best option but is still what surgeons opt for.

A quick google search finds this: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/...ryId=125627307

Sure, why wouldn't the company want to save money if it's not even needed for effective treatment? If it helps you why not? If it keeps my insurance premiums down, why not?

Sounds more to me that you like getting upset for the sake of being upset, especially when it's the Mayo Clinic and not some fly by night dr.
I think you’re missing the point. How do you not see the problem with this?
Roy Biggins is offline  
Old 10-24-2021, 07:46 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 94
Default

They call it the Jack Eichel clause.

I know of at least one pilot who went through hell trying to get JB to approve/pay for their back surgery.
crash312 is offline  
Old 10-25-2021, 06:39 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,128
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes View Post
Having access to the Mayo Clinic is a pretty big deal. With the reputation that the Mayo Clinic has, I find it highly unlikely that anyone would willfully tarnish it, let alone risk ruining their personal careers for the likes of JetBlue.
As somebody who's family is full of MD's two of which also do insurance company reviews..... if there is a way to ethically find a procedure unnecessary at that time, that is what they will do. Except that rarely happens. Most of the time they do find the attending physicians treatment plan acceptable and recommend insurance approval.
From speaking with them over the years, in simplest terms, they're both convinced - for example - that the insurance industry would rather spend 2 million on reviews than spend 1 million on unneeded procedures.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 10-25-2021, 07:43 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 51
Default

Questions from a potential new hire.
What are the opinions on Blue vs Green health plan?
And how about United vs BCBS? I live in NYC if that matters.
FlyingDutch is offline  
Old 10-25-2021, 01:07 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingDutch View Post
Questions from a potential new hire.
What are the opinions on Blue vs Green health plan?
And how about United vs BCBS? I live in NYC if that matters.
If you are making so much that you are running out of places to tax shelter your $$$, Blue plan. The Blue plan is a retirement vehicle, but it costs roughly $500/year more than the Green plan.

The game is you max out your healthy rewards and contribute from your paychecks up to the $7500 maximum, then pay for all medical expenses on your own. The contributions grow tax free and can be removed after 65 triple tax sheltered for medical care, or double tax sheltered for normal retirement expenses.


As for United vs BCBS...

They have different contracts at different hospitals. This could make a huge difference in how much you pay for care, but no one will tell you those rates, you might as well flip a coin.
MainlineFlyer is offline  
Old 10-25-2021, 02:24 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,188
Default

Do we use cvs Caremark for both of them?
SaintNick is offline  
Old 10-28-2021, 07:00 AM
  #17  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by MainlineFlyer View Post
Buried in the new benefits package is a potential landmine, the mandatory review by a company selected doctor. Before the company will pay for a spine procedure you must get an eReview. Based on this review they can force you to go to travel to another state, for their doctor to look at you. Think of this as an arbitration hearing for your healthcare. The company is willing to pay to fly you, and put you up in a hotel to see this doctor. How do you think he is going to find for your upcoming procedure? Now in any fights with the insurance company you will have your doctors vs this company shill.

We have seen how this works in "binding arbitration", where the arbitrators are chosen by the company. The outcomes are nearly always in the companies favor, and if they aren't damages awarded are tiny. Right now its limited to spinal care (good thing pilots don't get back pain), but I expect this to expand.

Here is the full text:
A note about Spine Support: Before your spine procedure can be covered by JetBlue Medical, Crewmembers and dependents will need to have a mandatory eReview from experts at Mayo Clinic, which is covered at 100%. If onsite travel to Mayo Clinic is recommended, the cost is covered by JetBlue, based on your Medical Option.

Are you sure this is new? My wife was on the verge of needing spinal surgery a couple of years ago, and I seem to remember seeing this clause at that time. This would have been 2-4 years ago. I think has been around for a while.
mere is offline  
Old 10-28-2021, 07:49 AM
  #18  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by mere View Post
Are you sure this is new? My wife was on the verge of needing spinal surgery a couple of years ago, and I seem to remember seeing this clause at that time. This would have been 2-4 years ago. I think has been around for a while.
I think you're right. On hellojetblue it has the 2021 enrollment guide it has the same clause on page 16 as it does in the 2022 enrollment guide.
base2final17 is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 04:35 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 360
Default

Since we're talking medical and it's open enrollment, what are peoples thoughts on short term disability?

From my understanding it pays up to 60% for 26 weeks, BUT if you work in Massachusetts, NY or CA, the states already have government funded STD for it's residents that would cover you first. For Boston based pilots, MA covers 43% up to $1084 weekly for 2022, and our out of pocket short term will cover the other 17%. Is it worth getting when the benefit is potentially that low?
AYLflyer is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 06:46 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by AYLflyer View Post
Since we're talking medical and it's open enrollment, what are peoples thoughts on short term disability?

From my understanding it pays up to 60% for 26 weeks, BUT if you work in Massachusetts, NY or CA, the states already have government funded STD for it's residents that would cover you first. For Boston based pilots, MA covers 43% up to $1084 weekly for 2022, and our out of pocket short term will cover the other 17%. Is it worth getting when the benefit is potentially that low?
The premiums for STD in those states are proportionately lower to account for that.
Blue Dude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
snowdawg
Delta
263
08-19-2015 01:17 PM
zippinbye
Delta
24
06-17-2015 01:45 PM
globalexpress
Pilot Health
6
12-31-2010 03:01 PM
Cortes
Pilot Health
1
07-28-2008 08:48 PM
dudewannabe
Cargo
1
07-26-2008 12:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices