Originally Posted by Descendto450 (Post 3492768)

Fully agree, PS is too easy for management to get out of. Plus it would be a separate plan that no other work group would have. If we negotiate a better PS scheme blue books dictates that all work groups would get it. Hence why PS will cost us too much but revenue sharing is IMO attainable in CBA 2.0.

Originally Posted by PSU Flyer (Post 3492856)

The company can easily change that with an accidental email that never gets rescinded…

Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 3492785)

But is it?
/QUOTE]

Yes, I already gave you some basic points on the subject.

As for revenue sharing, of course we would all want that. We can't (yet) even get B6 management to give us profit sharing (despite many efforts), which is only paid when the company is making money (and supposedly so easy to get out of... (It's not)), yet you think these same executives are just gonna let us tax their revenue, all the time, whether times are good or bad?

IF I did drugs, I'd ask you to share, because that has to be some good stuff you're using...

Originally Posted by Bluedriver (Post 3492844)

This response is also for Descendto450, who should know better.

Originally Posted by RadioFlyer123 (Post 3497552)

Any new updates on negotiations?

Originally Posted by avi8orco (Post 3497555)

yeah, just got the email. They are now just pursuing a contract extension. I have a feeling they think the won’t get a contract by the merger, if it even happens…I think they’re right and could have told them that when the merger was announced in the first place.

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18 (Post 3497581)

Good move. Let’s get it done!