JetBlue headed for bankruptcy
#81
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 12
The points have been regurgitated plenty of times. JetBlue’s debt being the main factor. Kirby and United would be taking a huge risk for very little reward.
I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
The points have been regurgitated plenty of times. JetBlue’s debt being the main factor. Kirby and United would be taking a huge risk for very little reward.
I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.
I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.
What exactly is the real risk?
#84
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 79
The points have been regurgitated plenty of times. JetBlue’s debt being the main factor. Kirby and United would be taking a huge risk for very little reward.
I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.
I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.
EWR is not JFK and Kirby knows that.
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 12
Just because he “appears” to have a long turn idea on dominating on a global scale, doesn’t that mean that acquiring Jetblue is part of his plan at all. I think this is where a lot of our pilots stumble in their thought process. We’ll see though….at this point, respectfully agree to disagree.
#86
#87
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 79
Here is a little chatGP for my argument. Like everyone else I don’t know if UAL will buy Jetblue (although I am on blended knee praying for such a miracle) but JFK if you want to rule the aviation world JFK is a much better option that EWR.
For international travelers, John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) is generally considered more desirable than Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)—but it depends on what you value. Here’s a clear, real-world breakdown:
Why JFK is usually preferred internationally
For international travelers, John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) is generally considered more desirable than Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)—but it depends on what you value. Here’s a clear, real-world breakdown:
Why JFK is usually preferred internationally
- Most global connections: JFK has the widest range of international routes and airlines in NYC
- Primary international gateway: It’s the busiest international passenger gateway in the Americas
- More airlines & alliances: Roughly 70+ international carriers vs. ~30 at EWR (industry estimates reflected in multiple sources)
- Better premium experience: More lounges, flagship terminals, and long-haul-focused infrastructure
- JFK is the global gateway
#88
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 371
Here is a little chatGP for my argument. Like everyone else I don’t know if UAL will buy Jetblue (although I am on blended knee praying for such a miracle) but JFK if you want to rule the aviation world JFK is a much better option that EWR.
For international travelers, John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) is generally considered more desirable than Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)—but it depends on what you value. Here’s a clear, real-world breakdown:
Why JFK is usually preferred internationally
For international travelers, John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) is generally considered more desirable than Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)—but it depends on what you value. Here’s a clear, real-world breakdown:
Why JFK is usually preferred internationally
- Most global connections: JFK has the widest range of international routes and airlines in NYC
- Primary international gateway: It’s the busiest international passenger gateway in the Americas
- More airlines & alliances: Roughly 70+ international carriers vs. ~30 at EWR (industry estimates reflected in multiple sources)
- Better premium experience: More lounges, flagship terminals, and long-haul-focused infrastructure
- JFK is the global gateway
I get all the arguments but its not like United is going to just dump EWR and go head to head with Delta and American in JFK and be relegated to being #2 or #3 there in perpetuity
Its been made pretty clear that United doesn't need or want a full blown hub in JFK. They want enough slots to fly LAX and SFO transcons into JFK and not much else. The number of 20-24 daily slot pairs is what's wanted and has been repeated numerous time by Kirby, Quayle etal. United gets 7 to start next year. I can't imagine making what would cost $11-$12B (costs plus debt acquisition) to go add 13 more daily slot pairs. United's market cap is $30B and spending effectively 35% of that just to go head to head with a bunch of competitors in the most crowded slot-controlled airport in the US doesn't make a lot of sense when 30 miles away you effectively have a monopoly with 440 daily flights.
Most of what's listed is actually a reason NOT to have a hub in JFK competing with every other airline in the world and its largest 2 US competitors. United wants to be #1 in every hub it operates in, and it is with the exception of being #2 in LAX only by about 1.5% behind Delta.
This whole rumor started when United and Jetblue were negotiating a partnership and that somehow got reported as "merger talks" but then a few months later turned out to be a partnership. Everything Kirby said regarding "we want to get into JFK in some way" and "the ball is in their court" was made in March 2025 before the partnership was made public in May 2025 while he was waiting for Jetblue management to agree to United's terms. None of that was about an outright purchase.
United is already getting back into JFK. You will see the planes there starting next year once we have enough of the "Coastliner" planes configured to run them back and forth from LAX and SFO. Anything more than that just doesn't make sense and if it did Kirby doesn't seem to be a "beat around the bush" kind of CEO. He's very forthcoming with what he says and so far he's done everything he says including saying he wasn't interested in acquiring Jetblue numerous times.
#89
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 79
Certainly but everything Jetblue does out of the North East is to Florida. Thats the problem. Every time there is a weather system on any kind JetBlue’s east coast leisure network suffers significantly while other carriers based in the same region can continue to fly elsewhere because they have presence elsewhere. This is the fundamental problem with the airline and one that was finally acknowledge by management recently.
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
If JFK is such a premium place to fly then why hasn't Jetblue been able to leverage this into profitability and be able to charge a premium in and out of there? How would United be able to support a robust international hub there and also maintain a hub in EWR? Maybe because its a super crowded ultra-competitive airport?
I get all the arguments but its not like United is going to just dump EWR and go head to head with Delta and American in JFK and be relegated to being #2 or #3 there in perpetuity
Its been made pretty clear that United doesn't need or want a full blown hub in JFK. They want enough slots to fly LAX and SFO transcons into JFK and not much else. The number of 20-24 daily slot pairs is what's wanted and has been repeated numerous time by Kirby, Quayle etal. United gets 7 to start next year. I can't imagine making what would cost $11-$12B (costs plus debt acquisition) to go add 13 more daily slot pairs. United's market cap is $30B and spending effectively 35% of that just to go head to head with a bunch of competitors in the most crowded slot-controlled airport in the US doesn't make a lot of sense when 30 miles away you effectively have a monopoly with 440 daily flights.
Most of what's listed is actually a reason NOT to have a hub in JFK competing with every other airline in the world and its largest 2 US competitors. United wants to be #1 in every hub it operates in, and it is with the exception of being #2 in LAX only by about 1.5% behind Delta.
This whole rumor started when United and Jetblue were negotiating a partnership and that somehow got reported as "merger talks" but then a few months later turned out to be a partnership. Everything Kirby said regarding "we want to get into JFK in some way" and "the ball is in their court" was made in March 2025 before the partnership was made public in May 2025 while he was waiting for Jetblue management to agree to United's terms. None of that was about an outright purchase.
United is already getting back into JFK. You will see the planes there starting next year once we have enough of the "Coastliner" planes configured to run them back and forth from LAX and SFO. Anything more than that just doesn't make sense and if it did Kirby doesn't seem to be a "beat around the bush" kind of CEO. He's very forthcoming with what he says and so far he's done everything he says including saying he wasn't interested in acquiring Jetblue numerous times.
I get all the arguments but its not like United is going to just dump EWR and go head to head with Delta and American in JFK and be relegated to being #2 or #3 there in perpetuity
Its been made pretty clear that United doesn't need or want a full blown hub in JFK. They want enough slots to fly LAX and SFO transcons into JFK and not much else. The number of 20-24 daily slot pairs is what's wanted and has been repeated numerous time by Kirby, Quayle etal. United gets 7 to start next year. I can't imagine making what would cost $11-$12B (costs plus debt acquisition) to go add 13 more daily slot pairs. United's market cap is $30B and spending effectively 35% of that just to go head to head with a bunch of competitors in the most crowded slot-controlled airport in the US doesn't make a lot of sense when 30 miles away you effectively have a monopoly with 440 daily flights.
Most of what's listed is actually a reason NOT to have a hub in JFK competing with every other airline in the world and its largest 2 US competitors. United wants to be #1 in every hub it operates in, and it is with the exception of being #2 in LAX only by about 1.5% behind Delta.
This whole rumor started when United and Jetblue were negotiating a partnership and that somehow got reported as "merger talks" but then a few months later turned out to be a partnership. Everything Kirby said regarding "we want to get into JFK in some way" and "the ball is in their court" was made in March 2025 before the partnership was made public in May 2025 while he was waiting for Jetblue management to agree to United's terms. None of that was about an outright purchase.
United is already getting back into JFK. You will see the planes there starting next year once we have enough of the "Coastliner" planes configured to run them back and forth from LAX and SFO. Anything more than that just doesn't make sense and if it did Kirby doesn't seem to be a "beat around the bush" kind of CEO. He's very forthcoming with what he says and so far he's done everything he says including saying he wasn't interested in acquiring Jetblue numerous times.
I think a lot of the rumor started here fyi
https://www.corriere.it/economia/tra...9xlk_amp.shtml
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



