Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue headed for bankruptcy >

JetBlue headed for bankruptcy


Notices

JetBlue headed for bankruptcy

Old 04-25-2026 | 02:31 PM
  #81  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 40
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
No it’s not obvious that United has a price. They should send the drug test lady with a clipboard to Kirby’s office in the Willis Tower if United has actually submitted an offer….low ball or not. No way…..
Why would it be crazy for Kirby to make an offer for JB?
Reply
Old 04-25-2026 | 03:00 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Why would it be crazy for Kirby to make an offer for JB?

The points have been regurgitated plenty of times. JetBlue’s debt being the main factor. Kirby and United would be taking a huge risk for very little reward.

I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.
Reply
Old 04-25-2026 | 03:34 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
The points have been regurgitated plenty of times. JetBlue’s debt being the main factor. Kirby and United would be taking a huge risk for very little reward.

I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.

What exactly is the real risk?
Reply
Old 04-25-2026 | 04:26 PM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 79
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
The points have been regurgitated plenty of times. JetBlue’s debt being the main factor. Kirby and United would be taking a huge risk for very little reward.

I also find it interesting that the only ones talking about this potential merger are some JetBlue pilots and bloggers looking for clicks. IMO that tells you a lot. I could be wrong though….look at Trump Air about to come into fruition. Who would’ve thought.
The debt argument is somewhat short sighted. Kirby appears to have a global, long term idea in mind and most, including analysts, believe that includes JFK(Jetblue).
EWR is not JFK and Kirby knows that.
Reply
Old 04-25-2026 | 06:24 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
The debt argument is somewhat short sighted. Kirby appears to have a global, long term idea in mind and most, including analysts, believe that includes JFK(Jetblue).
EWR is not JFK and Kirby knows that.

Just because he “appears” to have a long turn idea on dominating on a global scale, doesn’t that mean that acquiring Jetblue is part of his plan at all. I think this is where a lot of our pilots stumble in their thought process. We’ll see though….at this point, respectfully agree to disagree.
Reply
Old 04-26-2026 | 04:28 AM
  #86  
fireman0174's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Retired 121 pilot
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
Jetblue has had 25+ years to develop a network OUTSIDE of New York and chose not to do it. ?
You don't think jetBlue's operation out of BOS isn't, as you put it, a network?
Reply
Old 04-26-2026 | 04:29 AM
  #87  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 79
Default

Here is a little chatGP for my argument. Like everyone else I don’t know if UAL will buy Jetblue (although I am on blended knee praying for such a miracle) but JFK if you want to rule the aviation world JFK is a much better option that EWR.

For international travelers, John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) is generally considered more desirable than Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)—but it depends on what you value. Here’s a clear, real-world breakdown:

Why JFK is usually preferred internationally
  • Most global connections: JFK has the widest range of international routes and airlines in NYC
  • Primary international gateway: It’s the busiest international passenger gateway in the Americas
  • More airlines & alliances: Roughly 70+ international carriers vs. ~30 at EWR (industry estimates reflected in multiple sources)
  • Better premium experience: More lounges, flagship terminals, and long-haul-focused infrastructure
  • JFK is the global gateway

Reply
Old 04-26-2026 | 05:38 AM
  #88  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 371
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
Here is a little chatGP for my argument. Like everyone else I don’t know if UAL will buy Jetblue (although I am on blended knee praying for such a miracle) but JFK if you want to rule the aviation world JFK is a much better option that EWR.

For international travelers, John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) is generally considered more desirable than Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)—but it depends on what you value. Here’s a clear, real-world breakdown:

Why JFK is usually preferred internationally
  • Most global connections: JFK has the widest range of international routes and airlines in NYC
  • Primary international gateway: It’s the busiest international passenger gateway in the Americas
  • More airlines & alliances: Roughly 70+ international carriers vs. ~30 at EWR (industry estimates reflected in multiple sources)
  • Better premium experience: More lounges, flagship terminals, and long-haul-focused infrastructure
  • JFK is the global gateway
If JFK is such a premium place to fly then why hasn't Jetblue been able to leverage this into profitability and be able to charge a premium in and out of there? How would United be able to support a robust international hub there and also maintain a hub in EWR? Maybe because its a super crowded ultra-competitive airport?

I get all the arguments but its not like United is going to just dump EWR and go head to head with Delta and American in JFK and be relegated to being #2 or #3 there in perpetuity

Its been made pretty clear that United doesn't need or want a full blown hub in JFK. They want enough slots to fly LAX and SFO transcons into JFK and not much else. The number of 20-24 daily slot pairs is what's wanted and has been repeated numerous time by Kirby, Quayle etal. United gets 7 to start next year. I can't imagine making what would cost $11-$12B (costs plus debt acquisition) to go add 13 more daily slot pairs. United's market cap is $30B and spending effectively 35% of that just to go head to head with a bunch of competitors in the most crowded slot-controlled airport in the US doesn't make a lot of sense when 30 miles away you effectively have a monopoly with 440 daily flights.

Most of what's listed is actually a reason NOT to have a hub in JFK competing with every other airline in the world and its largest 2 US competitors. United wants to be #1 in every hub it operates in, and it is with the exception of being #2 in LAX only by about 1.5% behind Delta.

This whole rumor started when United and Jetblue were negotiating a partnership and that somehow got reported as "merger talks" but then a few months later turned out to be a partnership. Everything Kirby said regarding "we want to get into JFK in some way" and "the ball is in their court" was made in March 2025 before the partnership was made public in May 2025 while he was waiting for Jetblue management to agree to United's terms. None of that was about an outright purchase.

United is already getting back into JFK. You will see the planes there starting next year once we have enough of the "Coastliner" planes configured to run them back and forth from LAX and SFO. Anything more than that just doesn't make sense and if it did Kirby doesn't seem to be a "beat around the bush" kind of CEO. He's very forthcoming with what he says and so far he's done everything he says including saying he wasn't interested in acquiring Jetblue numerous times.
Reply
Old 04-26-2026 | 06:05 AM
  #89  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 79
Default

Originally Posted by fireman0174
You don't think jetBlue's operation out of BOS isn't, as you put it, a network?
Certainly but everything Jetblue does out of the North East is to Florida. Thats the problem. Every time there is a weather system on any kind JetBlue’s east coast leisure network suffers significantly while other carriers based in the same region can continue to fly elsewhere because they have presence elsewhere. This is the fundamental problem with the airline and one that was finally acknowledge by management recently.
Reply
Old 04-26-2026 | 06:34 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
If JFK is such a premium place to fly then why hasn't Jetblue been able to leverage this into profitability and be able to charge a premium in and out of there? How would United be able to support a robust international hub there and also maintain a hub in EWR? Maybe because its a super crowded ultra-competitive airport?

I get all the arguments but its not like United is going to just dump EWR and go head to head with Delta and American in JFK and be relegated to being #2 or #3 there in perpetuity

Its been made pretty clear that United doesn't need or want a full blown hub in JFK. They want enough slots to fly LAX and SFO transcons into JFK and not much else. The number of 20-24 daily slot pairs is what's wanted and has been repeated numerous time by Kirby, Quayle etal. United gets 7 to start next year. I can't imagine making what would cost $11-$12B (costs plus debt acquisition) to go add 13 more daily slot pairs. United's market cap is $30B and spending effectively 35% of that just to go head to head with a bunch of competitors in the most crowded slot-controlled airport in the US doesn't make a lot of sense when 30 miles away you effectively have a monopoly with 440 daily flights.

Most of what's listed is actually a reason NOT to have a hub in JFK competing with every other airline in the world and its largest 2 US competitors. United wants to be #1 in every hub it operates in, and it is with the exception of being #2 in LAX only by about 1.5% behind Delta.

This whole rumor started when United and Jetblue were negotiating a partnership and that somehow got reported as "merger talks" but then a few months later turned out to be a partnership. Everything Kirby said regarding "we want to get into JFK in some way" and "the ball is in their court" was made in March 2025 before the partnership was made public in May 2025 while he was waiting for Jetblue management to agree to United's terms. None of that was about an outright purchase.

United is already getting back into JFK. You will see the planes there starting next year once we have enough of the "Coastliner" planes configured to run them back and forth from LAX and SFO. Anything more than that just doesn't make sense and if it did Kirby doesn't seem to be a "beat around the bush" kind of CEO. He's very forthcoming with what he says and so far he's done everything he says including saying he wasn't interested in acquiring Jetblue numerous times.
Thank you AGAIN for clearing all of this up for us.
I think a lot of the rumor started here fyi
https://www.corriere.it/economia/tra...9xlk_amp.shtml
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
benzoate
Major
271
05-10-2013 10:34 AM
Gman
Major
34
04-12-2007 08:43 PM
fireman0174
JetBlue
6
08-24-2006 05:06 PM
LeeFXDWG
JetBlue
16
05-02-2006 08:30 AM
RockBottom
Major
1
04-21-2006 04:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices