jetBlue Hiring
10-16-2016, 02:12 PM
#9061
SDQ Base Chief
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Originally Posted by silver fleet
I know this gets asked often, but its a moving target with the occasional surprise; but whats the most junior DOH in LGB for this current bid award? Thanks!!!
Filler filler
10-16-2016, 02:14 PM
#9062
SDQ Base Chief
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Originally Posted by WhiteHammer
So what happens to those that have a seat lock on the 190. They just hang out with negative seniority? Or will there be displacement?
We don't have any displacement language in the FSM currently, but there is nothing stopping them from adding that tomorrow.
10-16-2016, 07:42 PM
#9064
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 79
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Your guess is as good as mine, but I'd wager the company would remove any equipment locks for 190 pilots to help move them out.
We don't have any displacement language in the FSM currently, but there is nothing stopping them from adding that tomorrow.
We don't have any displacement language in the FSM currently, but there is nothing stopping them from adding that tomorrow.
10-17-2016, 06:35 AM
#9065
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
jetBlue Hiring
If they release a seat lock for 1 they have to do it for all according to the FSM.
I don't see them doing that though. Too cheap. Instead they will make the trips miserable in JFK until everyone leaves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't see them doing that though. Too cheap. Instead they will make the trips miserable in JFK until everyone leaves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-17-2016, 06:52 AM
#9066
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
If they release a seat lock for 1 they have to do it for all according to the FSM.
I don't see them doing that though. Too cheap. Instead they will make the trips miserable in JFK until everyone leaves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't see them doing that though. Too cheap. Instead they will make the trips miserable in JFK until everyone leaves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-17-2016, 10:07 AM
#9069
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Originally Posted by full of luv
Why not just start a few pairings each day with JFK-FLL until they get the correct amount of peeps to leave?
Because the route demands an Airbus 10 times a day. Unless you are talking about DH which gets expensive quick.
Either way I don't see a full closer of JFK 190 until we have a CBA. Really I think we will shrink JFK down to about 50 crews for now and shrink BOS a bit to get the FLL base going.
It could also come at the expense of MCO 190 but no one is willing going to leave MCO(they all live there) so it won't close until we have a displacement language either.
It's a good bargaining chip to hold over the company. Although really they own the FSM and could add the language tomorrow without ALPA approval if they wanted too. It would just **** off a ton of people even more.
Remember the only thing status quo right now is the PEA's and LOA's signed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
