Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

New Open Skies deal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2007, 05:43 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Default New Open Skies deal

Canada and US reached a deal on open skies today. Now airlines can pickup passengers in either country and fly to a third country. AirCanada is by far the biggest benificiary of this deal. They just got a whole new international market opened up for them.... flights to anywhere in the world from Chicago, Newyork, LA, San Fran, and the list goes on. US carriers dont get a whole lot out of this deal. Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary...

What do you think this will do for American carriers?
Linebacker35 is offline  
Old 03-12-2007, 06:18 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Linebacker35 View Post
Canada and US reached a deal on open skies .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ..................................................
What do you think this will do for American carriers?
Provide an even more uneven playing field..............
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 04:56 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by Linebacker35 View Post
Canada and US reached a deal on open skies today. Now airlines can pickup passengers in either country and fly to a third country. AirCanada is by far the biggest benificiary of this deal. They just got a whole new international market opened up for them.... flights to anywhere in the world from Chicago, Newyork, LA, San Fran, and the list goes on. US carriers dont get a whole lot out of this deal. Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary...

What do you think this will do for American carriers?
Do you have a link to this news?
PaintCan is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 06:18 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Cleared4Tkeoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 F/O
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by PaintCan View Post
Do you have a link to this news?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...tory/Business/

The assault on your career continues...
Cleared4Tkeoff is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 06:53 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Default

Air Canada as been planning a LA-Sydney route for a long time now using their new 777's. Feed passengers from across canada into LA then fly the 777 between LA and sydney. Seems weird that AC would pick this route considering it goes up against their close ally United.
Also talk about more caribian, central/south america flying via florida
Linebacker35 is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 06:57 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NGINEWHOISWHAT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by Linebacker35 View Post
Air Canada as been planning a LA-Sydney route for a long time now using their new 777's. Feed passengers from across canada into LA then fly the 777 between LA and sydney. Seems weird that AC would pick this route considering it goes up against their close ally United.
Also talk about more caribian, central/south america flying via florida
All is fair in love and war. I think we are going to see a lot of "friendships" crumble ... Air Canada get the Windfall. American pilots get the shaft. Thanks, W.

tom
NGINEWHOISWHAT is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 05:11 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: college
Posts: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Linebacker35 View Post
Air Canada as been planning a LA-Sydney route for a long time now using their new 777's. Feed passengers from across canada into LA then fly the 777 between LA and sydney. Seems weird that AC would pick this route considering it goes up against their close ally United.
Also talk about more caribian, central/south america flying via florida

IIRC Air Canada wanted to go into LAX to replace the stop they had to make in HNL because customs there was too much of a pain in the arse, the 767 had to make the stop either way. Now that they're getting 777's they are going to fly direct without the stop in HNL, the LAX idea is scrapped. Finally they're getting rid of those gas guzzeling A340's .
Taylor0289 is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 05:38 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Default

Originally Posted by Taylor0289 View Post
IIRC Air Canada wanted to go into LAX to replace the stop they had to make in HNL because customs there was too much of a pain in the arse, the 767 had to make the stop either way. Now that they're getting 777's they are going to fly direct without the stop in HNL, the LAX idea is scrapped. Finally they're getting rid of those gas guzzeling A340's .
They did not scrap the LA idea.... they posponed it several months ago waiting for the results of the open skies. The idea was to feed trafic into LA with smaller aircraft then use the 777 between LA and Sydney. Which makes more sense then Vancouver. They may return to this plan soon enough.
The 340's were a good plane, they purposly made it 4 engines so it would not have to follow certain regulations.... just bad luck damn OPEC keeps driving the price of oil up
Linebacker35 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HerkFCC
Regional
5
03-11-2007 08:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM
Browntail
Major
21
06-18-2006 03:35 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2006 11:25 AM
RockBottom
Major
58
02-27-2006 06:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices