Pax complains about AA on twitter
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Posts: 1,128
Exactly! Too many people running around frightened by the media. Case in point is the Delta Captain who broke up the fight between two of Atlanta's finest citizens on a jetbridge. Bravo Zulu, skipper! The media couldn't jump all over him because there was no where to go with it. Exercise some good judgement, be professional when you exercise your authority, and be a leader. I doubt very much this story will go anywhere other than having people who know this woman well nodding their heads as they acknowldege that it's no surprise she's involved.
#22
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 294
I was accused of being aracist in 2008 because I had to have the FA move 2 people from the front to back in a crj 200. Nobody volunteered so the male Filipino FA involuntaryily moved a black couple to the back. They claimed i was the racist because I directed the FA to move them. I still get good laugh outta this from the shear stupidity level of some people.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
She probably needed to be removed. But...
1. It sounds like the first exchange was in the gate area. No way I'm going out of my way engage a visibly disgruntled passenger who isn't even on the plane.
2. If she's on the plane causing more problems and the FA reports to me as such (and the FA imo is not an instigator) all that needs to be done is make a call to ops. "Please send an agent/supervisor/etc to remove the passenger in seat xyz." Agent goes back to the passenger and asks them to collect their things. If the passenger refuses then they can call the appropriate people to make sure the passenger is removed. No need to call the passenger over the PA or even have face time with the passenger. If the agent or my supervisor wants an explanation they can ask me in private but not in front of the passenger and I'm not going to explain it to them which will only lead to a confrontation of outrage or an attempt to get me to change my mind. Neither of which has a good outcome not to mention we don't need the outside stressors right before operating the flight.
I've only had a couple removals and all were intoxicated as reported by a non dramatic FA. Never so much as had any contact with the passenger or questioned by anyone. Just stay out of it is my motto.
1. It sounds like the first exchange was in the gate area. No way I'm going out of my way engage a visibly disgruntled passenger who isn't even on the plane.
2. If she's on the plane causing more problems and the FA reports to me as such (and the FA imo is not an instigator) all that needs to be done is make a call to ops. "Please send an agent/supervisor/etc to remove the passenger in seat xyz." Agent goes back to the passenger and asks them to collect their things. If the passenger refuses then they can call the appropriate people to make sure the passenger is removed. No need to call the passenger over the PA or even have face time with the passenger. If the agent or my supervisor wants an explanation they can ask me in private but not in front of the passenger and I'm not going to explain it to them which will only lead to a confrontation of outrage or an attempt to get me to change my mind. Neither of which has a good outcome not to mention we don't need the outside stressors right before operating the flight.
I've only had a couple removals and all were intoxicated as reported by a non dramatic FA. Never so much as had any contact with the passenger or questioned by anyone. Just stay out of it is my motto.
#25
What was the stroller story, I forget?
If the pilot doesn't get involved, the media takes "aviation experts" and puts them on TV. Then those experts start chastising the Captain for not being there and taking control because it's his ship. Nevermind the split duties of who the security coordinator is at the gate versus closed up and ready for pushback. If you weren't in the picture, the media will chastice you for not taking charge. Get in the picture, and now you're on YouTube/TV. Damned if you do, and the same for don't. Personally I'd rather stay up front and let the gate agents deal with that - it's their job at that particular point.
If the pilot doesn't get involved, the media takes "aviation experts" and puts them on TV. Then those experts start chastising the Captain for not being there and taking control because it's his ship. Nevermind the split duties of who the security coordinator is at the gate versus closed up and ready for pushback. If you weren't in the picture, the media will chastice you for not taking charge. Get in the picture, and now you're on YouTube/TV. Damned if you do, and the same for don't. Personally I'd rather stay up front and let the gate agents deal with that - it's their job at that particular point.
But if you intervene you get to be live on the six o'clock news. If you stay out of line of site the worst they could do is learn your name... not newsworthy if you didn't do anything outrageous. You can't be faulted for calling GSC or cops, as appropriate... that's most likely what your GOM says anyway.
But ANY footage will edited, "commentated on", and "re-contexted" to make your actions appear outrageous.
I think staying out of sight and letting the system deal with it is the win today.
#28
I agree with you, Sliceback. The captain obviously felt it rose to a level meriting his involvement. Based on what little I know, namely the hysterical race card playing response of the passenger, I'm leaning towards imagining she probably deserved to be removed. But I wasn't there so I won't critique him. And I wouldn't even if I had been. But that's maturity for you. Something Lemon's posts tend to lack.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Not related to this particular incident per say, didn’t want to start a new thread:
NAACP warns black passengers about traveling with American Airlines - Oct. 25, 2017
NAACP warns black passengers about traveling with American Airlines - Oct. 25, 2017
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,479
Not related to this particular incident per say, didn’t want to start a new thread:
NAACP warns black passengers about traveling with American Airlines - Oct. 25, 2017
NAACP warns black passengers about traveling with American Airlines - Oct. 25, 2017
You know what happens? Because people are insecure, by nature, they seek alliance or identify strongly with groups appearing similar. Illusion mostly, in order to make themselves feel bigger, protected. Becomes habit & prompts others to do the same. So then everybody goes around, labeling and making assumptions about who you are before they ever see the first thing about you as a person. Which, in turn, leads to exaggerated & false claims of being treated unfairly if you don't get special attention or whatever else you believed was promised as the MasterCard charge went through on Expedia.
Meanwhile, from the CEO inner sanctum:
Bad publicity? No way, find a patsy. Didn't come this far to have some boarding schizoid tarnish my sterling image, not to mention one penny of the compensation entitled a man of my obvious talent & stature. Prepare a statement, apologizing for the unfortunate conduct of…gate agent, flight attendant, pilot, whatever floats. Mention we are only following protocol the doughnut squad advised us to do. Authorize legal to buy claimant's silence in exchange for his/her unthinkable viral embarrassment, before lunch if possible. Well, there's a surprise, others see opportunity and copy cat. Cost of doing business these days. Don't just stand there, go draft some more apologies fart face.