Helperto EL

Well if I understand correctly this should not even be a part of the decision process, again there are many already at Delta that didn’t even take this test....seems to me it is a scam.... again corporate garbage and not even sure because supposedly they have a legal rep (why is that)in this board meeting. Again just plan garbage!

CAirBear

Ahhh. You talking about the conversation with the shrink perhaps?

From what I gather, pilots from Endeavor (or whatever preferential regional program they have set up now) don’t have to talk to them, but everyone else does.

Apparently the shrink has 100% say in your future there.

Incredible.

KelvinHelmholtz

Under the current Endeavor DGI program, the entire interview must be completed. The previous program (SSP) didn’t require the second day of the interview.

Helperto EL

Exactly my thoughts! Very poor process! Seems to me gaging someone in a 20 minute conversation is horrible and from a test that isn’t proven to be accurate. The test can only be evaluated by a shrink and they supposedly are the only ones who can interpret it! Again corporate garbage!

GuardPolice

While it sounded like it was Delta all along, I didn’t want to assume it was and then be made a fool if it wasn’t. I don’t know enough about the other AA's and UAL's processes so I asked him to verify.

You hold a commonly incorrect view of Delta's selection process. It’s not about if you’re a good pilot; frankly they wouldn’t invite people to interview if they thought otherwise. It’s all about preparation. This entire process exists to test preparation and to see what kind of person you are outside of flying. Delta is confident enough in their training department to mold a NH into the type of pilot they want.

As with any company’s selection process, good people fall through the cracks. Every airline has had this occur, even one's without all “the psycho babble BS.” It doesn’t mean they are unworthy it's just proof no process is perfect. However, a highly subjective process has to be made highly objective to prevent the illusion of favoritism. History has shown some people can get trigger happy with lawsuits. To combat that, a points system is instituted so data can be used to justify hiring or not hiring a person.

Delta's convinced their process works and that is proven by the fact that it hasn’t changed for many years and has been used to hire thousands upon thousands of employees. I know it sounds curt, but it’s their method so one has to the play game as the price of admission.


GP

GuardPolice

You can thank those who have chosen to sue companies like Delta for alleged wrongful hiring practices. IMHO, you’re seeing the consequences of that.


GP

Omniscient

“They are what we thought they were”
-Dennis Green’s words ring true

Delta is Delta. Fair or unfair, completely irrelevant. It’s their game, their decision.

Move on, no need to wonder the method they use, it’s their method.

Helperto EL

GP
I understand what you’re saying. I agree it is a game. Preparation didn’t seem to be an issue for this individual. Many processes have flaws and this is a big flaw as I see it. To be offered a job on a condition such as this type of test like this is not ethical. Let the applicant get through the whole process first before offering the job. BTW many have gone to Delta that haven’t taken it. It’s pure silly and it’s a huge mistake. I know people slip through the cracks it does happen. Life does go on and no question the applicant was qualified.

galleycafe

George is getting upset!

Plane Coffee

Iceberg

All parts of the interview have claimed many “victims.” It is what it is and no amount of complaining on here changes that. Delta signs the checks so Delta sets the rules. It’s unfortunate you or your friend wasn’t hired but, as you said, no need to cry.