![]() |
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 2959622)
If we were on the same team then why do the major unions allow regional pilots to be treated so poorly as compared to the major pilots?
Groupthink is idiotic. |
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 2959622)
If we were on the same team then why do the major unions allow regional pilots to be treated so poorly as compared to the major pilots?
Groupthink is idiotic. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2959649)
Major unions don’t negotiate contracts for regionals nor can they legally do so. The current career track for young pilots is vastly improved from the days when you flight instructed to 1000 hours, then got a job flying solo all night in a piston twin with a load of checks for 10 bucks an hour and finally were able to move to a regional turboprop operator for 18 bucks an hour after you had 3000 total hours and 1000 multi.
:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2960987)
Walking uphill BOTH WAYS IN THE SNOW...
:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2961323)
And if you are in Chicago, there is a chance you could be chomped by a coyote.
|
[QUOTE=Voski;2918173]What is the viability of the ultra-low cost carrier model in the U.S.? As companies like Spirit and Frontier continue to expand their fleet of A320neo aircraft, the profitability of these airlines in the current U.S. economy is undeniable. However, what are the pros and cons of their business model going forward? Are they a threat to the market share and dominance of the legacy carriers?
I'm genuinely interested because the model seems to be successful throughout Europe, however, I wonder if the ULCC model is filling a gap in the market or if it's eroding the profits of carriers like Delta, United, and American. Moreover, pilots seeking jobs at major carriers have a lot of options nowadays and will hopefully continue to see a hot job market for a few years ahead. The ULCCs seem like great options and alternatives to the 'Big 6,' but I have to question whether these airlines have the career stability (as much as that exists in the airlines) that the Big 6 have...[/QUOTE |
The ULCCs certainly provide a nice alternative career to the Big boys.
With so much industry consolidation there are fewer career airlines than there used to be. I strongly believe that the remaining few big airlines are stronger and will survive any recession and provide better job security than in the past. However, there's less choices now then there used to be. If you botch the Hogan at United and fail your Delta interview, your choices become very limited very fast. Anyhow, I think the ULCCs will grow thru the next recession while the big airlines slow or stop growth. ULCCs are proving to be very successful all over the world. Just not in the long haul markets. And for the record, the ULCCs claim to be generating new traffic and not stealing from other airline |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 2961425)
. ULCCs are proving to be very successful all over the world.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2961487)
Not really in Europe, except Ryanair which as sort of established itself as the budget SWA over there. Many of the rest are falling like flies (their legacies aren't all doing so great either).
|
The long haul low cost airlines really struggle. The short haul ones seem to do well. Ryan, Easy and Wizz have completely changed the entire market in Europe
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands