![]() |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3213849)
Thanks Gov’ment for that cheese |
Originally Posted by singlepilot
(Post 3213758)
This was the big “test” people were waiting to see, how the ULCCs fared in a down economy.
The full outcome still remains to be seen, but it appears that they (predominantly NK and F9) not only survived but thrived. I was happily sitting at Frontier but wanting to see how the ULCC model survived a downturn. Covid was obviously way worse than I ever expected but Frontier and Spirit seem to have survived better than the big boys. I'm obviously staying at Frontier now! |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 3213856)
Thank our grandkids. They're the ones paying for it.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3213849)
And now Uncle Sam is still writing payroll support checks, which Spirit is gladly accepting, and using to fuel our growth. Not a bad deal for Spirit. PSP2 covered Spirit’s losses for the upcoming quarter, total losses. So it’s not even payroll support, it’s “total losses support”, allowing Spirit to tap into their proportionally ample cash reserves for growth.
Thanks Gov’ment for that cheese |
Originally Posted by ElCaribe
(Post 3213936)
There is definitely room for Spirit to grow their market share. However, I do think their growth can only go so far. Don’t take this next comment personally as it has zero to do with the pilots: A lot of people out there hate spirit and will pay more to not fly on them. Just saying. But I agree they will make ground on those customers who chose the basic economy on legacies and those trying to save a buck.
|
Originally Posted by ElCaribe
(Post 3213936)
A lot of people out there hate spirit and will pay more to not fly on them. Just saying. But I agree they will make ground on those customers who chose the basic economy on legacies and those trying to save a buck.
The biggest gripe I get from people when they find out that I fly for Frontier (and the same holds for Spirit complaints) is lack of flight frequency and the “nickel and dime” pricing. The first will likely be solved in time as both airlines grow. Neither will ever have legacy level six flight per day between city pairs, but even twice a day to popular locations could ease some passenger apprehension. The latter is a complaint that I’ve been hearing less and less. I do believe people are starting to understand that it’s a “pay for what you use” model, not a “milk the passenger” model. Why be forced to pay for an appetizer if you don’t want, or plan to eat, the appetizer when you go to a restaurant? Many people will eventually realize that bags don’t ever fly for free, just as they began to understand that “More direct flights than any other airline” does not mean “More nonstop flights...”. |
Originally Posted by TOGALOCK
(Post 3213944)
The biggest gripe I get from people when they find out that I fly for Frontier (and the same holds for Spirit complaints) is lack of flight frequency and the “nickel and dime” pricing. The first will likely be solved in time as both airlines grow. Neither will ever have legacy level six flight per day between city pairs, but even twice a day to popular locations could ease some passenger apprehension. The latter is a complaint that I’ve been hearing less and less. |
Originally Posted by ElCaribe
(Post 3213936)
There is definitely room for Spirit to grow their market share. However, I do think their growth can only go so far. Don’t take this next comment personally as it has zero to do with the pilots: A lot of people out there hate spirit and will pay more to not fly on them. Just saying. But I agree they will make ground on those customers who chose the basic economy on legacies and those trying to save a buck.
same issues. Luckily for Spirit, 2/3 of the legacy carriers usually sit DFL in performance and overall ratings. So any apprehension some people might have about the product can be solved based on the more expensive Legacy alternative who will get you there with less reliable and in the same uncomfortable seat, just for more money. |
Originally Posted by Silver02ex
(Post 3213942)
It’s not just about growing new routes or destinations, but adding frequency to current ones. We use to have many routes that we serve 1 flight a day. If that flight cancels, it’s a nightmare when it comes to rebooking those affected passengers.
|
Right.
Frontier already serves over 100 destinations. We don't need any new cities, we need frequency |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:18 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands