Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement age 67

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2022 | 09:35 AM
  #251  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
While I agree it would be ridiculous to expect one person to sacrifice for another…that “era of absolutely unprecedented career opportunity” ONLY exists due to mandatory airline retirements.
And it's still going to happen, even if it takes a 2-3 year delay (I'm confident they won't go beyond 68 and even if they did there would be so few takers it would be irrelevant).

A young-ish pilot who gets hired atbig three/FDX today will QUICKLY advance to very high seniority as a NB FO or decent seniority as a NB CA and then have a very lucrative and comfortable existence for many decades to come. You don't need an indefinite run of massive retirements, just enough to get YOU to a good spot where you can happily hang out for the long term. As opposed to languishing at the regionals and/or furloughs for a couple decades.

While the retirements slow down a bit later in the decade, they'll actually still continue at a pretty good clip (by historical standards) well into the 2030's.
Old 05-21-2022 | 09:43 AM
  #252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
And it's still going to happen, even if it takes a 2-3 year delay (I'm confident they won't go beyond 68 and even if they did there would be so few takers it would be irrelevant).

A young-ish pilot who gets hired atbig three/FDX today will QUICKLY advance to very high seniority as a NB FO or decent seniority as a NB CA and then have a very lucrative and comfortable existence for many decades to come. You don't need an indefinite run of massive retirements, just enough to get YOU to a good spot where you can happily hang out for the long term. As opposed to languishing at the regionals and/or furloughs for a couple decades.

While the retirements slow down a bit later in the decade, they'll actually still continue at a pretty good clip (by historical standards) well into the 2030's.
Nope. It won’t be a 2-3 year delay and it won’t fix the problem. 60 to 65 screwed me for over 10 years not five because other economic factors happened at the same time. And guess what here we are again. Didn’t fix the problem. Kicked the can down the road. Yet my progression was delayed 10years.
Old 05-21-2022 | 09:54 AM
  #253  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by dualinput
Nope. It won’t be a 2-3 year delay and it won’t fix the problem. 60 to 65 screwed me for over 10 years not five because other economic factors happened at the same time. And guess what here we are again. Didn’t fix the problem. Kicked the can down the road. Yet my progression was delayed 10years.
But that was not caused by age 65, as you say, other factors. Age 65 resulted in a career delay of somewhere between 3-4 ish years (not everybody stayed to 65).

There will always be "other factors" to one degree or another.

The 2008 recession was not caused by airline pilots over the age of 60, correlation is not necessarily causation
Old 05-21-2022 | 10:09 AM
  #254  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,886
Likes: 121
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
A young-ish pilot who gets hired atbig three/FDX today will QUICKLY advance to very high seniority as a NB FO or decent seniority as a NB CA and then have a very lucrative and comfortable existence for many decades to come.
The key word there is “today”.

“Today” stops for a massive number of regional, military and bizav pilots if people stop leaving off the top of the list, even if for “only” 2-3 years. And for those junior pilots who squeak onto the list, 2-3 years of relative stagnation.

Mandatory airline retirements are THE singular reason for the industry’s dynamic movement and career progression. They are the rising tide that are lifting all ships across all segments of industry.
Old 05-21-2022 | 10:11 AM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
But that was not caused by age 65, as you say, other factors. Age 65 resulted in a career delay of somewhere between 3-4 ish years (not everybody stayed to 65).

There will always be "other factors" to one degree or another.

The 2008 recession was not caused by airline pilots over the age of 60, correlation is not necessarily causation
There will be other factors again. Those economic factors will happen regardless. Let’s not try to fix what’s happening in the economy with an age extension because when the economy goes south the age extension is going to hurt twice as much.
Old 05-21-2022 | 10:53 AM
  #256  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by dualinput
There will be other factors again. Those economic factors will happen regardless. Let’s not try to fix what’s happening in the economy with an age extension because when the economy goes south the age extension is going to hurt twice as much.
It's not up to me. Sounds like at least some of the unions are advocating for status quo, so that's good.
Old 05-21-2022 | 10:55 AM
  #257  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
The key word there is “today”.

“Today” stops for a massive number of regional, military and bizav pilots if people stop leaving off the top of the list, even if for “only” 2-3 years. And for those junior pilots who squeak onto the list, 2-3 years of relative stagnation.

Mandatory airline retirements are THE singular reason for the industry’s dynamic movement and career progression. They are the rising tide that are lifting all ships across all segments of industry.
If you're in your 20's or 30's, you won't hardly notice it. Would suck for older people who need to move a little further up the ladder but don't want to work after 65 themselves.
Old 05-21-2022 | 11:04 AM
  #258  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,886
Likes: 121
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
If you're in your 20's or 30's, you won't hardly notice it.
You can’t honestly believe that.
Old 05-21-2022 | 11:08 AM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
If you're in your 20's or 30's, you won't hardly notice it. Would suck for older people who need to move a little further up the ladder but don't want to work after 65 themselves.
Except people do notice. This is a major problem with millennials. Your 20’s is when you want to start making money, saving for and buying a home, starting a family. A delay puts all that on hold which is bad for the country and eventually people don’t wait and take up other lines of work which hurts pilot supply long term. I know many that left the industry in their 20s bc of the effects of age 65 and 2008 together. They never came back bc life happened and starting over wasn’t an option.

Older gens think sure a younger person can recover or wait out a pause but life doesn’t go on pause while your career does. Decisions get made and pilots leave from the bottom and cut their losses
Old 05-21-2022 | 11:46 AM
  #260  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 844
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
If you're in your 20's or 30's, you won't hardly notice it. Would suck for older people who need to move a little further up the ladder but don't want to work after 65 themselves.
I remember looking up most junior captain at American in 2016. It was a ‘96 hire on the super 80 in LGA. Pretty sure someone hired at age 31 and not upgrading on an MD-80 while commuting to LaGuardia at 50 would notice.

Saying that won’t happen again sounds like Doug Parker saying the airlines won’t lose money again.

There are waves in aviation. Nothing is assured and today’s predictions are meaningless. Not to mention that some of these waves are already on the back end.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SonicFlyer
Major
254
01-28-2022 04:58 PM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices