Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement age 67

Old 07-04-2022 | 03:36 PM
  #301  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Pushing for 56 is the exact same thing as pushing to keep 65.
None of the younger pilots are pushing for Age 56. And it was an example, it's not really a thing.

And no, by no stretch of the imagination, would continuing with the status quo of 65 be the same as pushing for Age 56.
Old 07-04-2022 | 08:54 PM
  #302  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,179
Likes: 256
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
None of the younger pilots are pushing for Age 56. And it was an example, it's not really a thing.

And no, by no stretch of the imagination, would continuing with the status quo of 65 be the same as pushing for Age 56.
you are the one who brought it up. I just said that everyone is in the game for themselves and trying to deny that is what I was calling out.
Also hate prune juice.
Old 07-05-2022 | 02:11 AM
  #303  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
you are the one who brought it up. I just said that everyone is in the game for themselves and trying to deny that is what I was calling out.
Also hate prune juice.
Still a negative there. You calling the opposing groups the same doesn't make it so.

Both groups agreed to a set of terms when they joined the profession. Now, one group wants to change those terms to benefit themselves. That is the difference.
Old 07-05-2022 | 04:24 AM
  #304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,524
Likes: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
you are the one who brought it up. I just said that everyone is in the game for themselves and trying to deny that is what I was calling out.
Also hate prune juice.
There's a big difference between not wanting to further devalue your career for the benefit of the few and wanting to move the retirement age so you can spend years longer in the most lucrative and highest QOL position. Both are not greed.
Old 07-05-2022 | 06:19 AM
  #305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 138
Default

Greed, selfishness can outlast any career. Fit & still frisky, water cannon at 80. Why not?
Old 07-05-2022 | 07:32 AM
  #306  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

If airliners aren’t all single/0 pilot 30 years from now I’ll eat my hat. I want my money now, not a longer career after 2-3 years of stagnation. I sincerely hope those who have been able to retire in aviation, and have been planning on retirement at 65 can enjoy their next chapter.
Old 07-05-2022 | 09:19 AM
  #307  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,179
Likes: 256
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
Still a negative there. You calling the opposing groups the same doesn't make it so.

Both groups agreed to a set of terms when they joined the profession. Now, one group wants to change those terms to benefit themselves. That is the difference.
Nope. That is not what is happening. No big lobby of grey pilots asking for age 68. Only thing I said was that your motivation to keep the status quo is exactly as selfish as those wanting to change it. And as far as agreeing to a set of terms, pulleeeze give me a break. 3 pilot cockpit, far 117, 1500 hour rule, do i need to go on? The only reason you are against age 68 is because you don't benefit from it. Admit it and move on. That's what I did when age 65 happened.
Old 07-05-2022 | 09:47 AM
  #308  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Only thing I said was that your motivation to keep the status quo is exactly as selfish as those wanting to change it. And as far as agreeing to a set of terms, pulleeeze give me a break. 3 pilot cockpit, far 117, 1500 hour rule, do i need to go on? The only reason you are against age 68 is because you don't benefit from it. Admit it and move on. That's what I did when age 65 happened.
You are about as far out of reality as that MyTime2025 troll.

I would benefit from changing the rule to Age 68. So not only are you incorrect in your accusations against me, you are flat out wrong in your reading of other people's motivations.
Old 07-05-2022 | 10:05 AM
  #309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
You are about as far out of reality as that MyTime2025 troll.

I would benefit from changing the rule to Age 68. So not only are you incorrect in your accusations against me, you are flat out wrong in your reading of other people's motivations.
Are you still an FO at LUV? My guess is FO.
What's your age? My guess is early 50s.
Answer those questions and then we can talk about motivations.
Old 07-05-2022 | 10:45 AM
  #310  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
My guess is early 50s.
Answer those questions and then we can talk about motivations.
nope but nice try.

oh and “ordering” someone to answer your questions over the internet is a very silly look.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SonicFlyer
Major
254
01-28-2022 04:58 PM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices