Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Leave AA for United

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2022, 09:43 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,121
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso View Post
Right. I’m going off of pretty old info. They planned on some of the incoming 787-9s as replacements for some 777-2s. That’s pre pandemic plans. So lots has changed and these days managements only complains about a shortage of wide bodies. The oldest 200 was delivered in 1999 so they could easily get another decade out of them if they maintain them right.
Yep. And they aren’t the clapped out engine failure A-models that UAL has a ton of.

That said, I’ll believe all the aforementioned when I see it from this incompetent mgmt regime.
thrust is offline  
Old 11-24-2022, 10:09 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by thayer7th View Post
I can't believe I'm making one of these threads.

34 years old. 13 months at AA, live in NE Ohio, fly the C-17 close by, have 8 years left to 20 for the military retirement.

Bidding 20% NYC FO on narrow body, very easy commute, but still a commute, decent schedule for a year on property, could be a line holding 777 FO in another year in NYC, have thought about bidding 737 captain when I wouldn't be the very bottom. We all know AA's pros and shortcomings so I'll save the typing. Was planning on moving to a senior AA base and commuting the military gig eventually.

Have the opportunity to jump to United where I can drive to work at CLE or commute to ORD for a better run airline with more wide bodies and a desire to not be the worlds largest regional.

Obviously contract 2023 is the big unknown for both places. Frankly I am keeping my FedEx app updated, but that's a pipe dream at best.

Thoughts?

Thanks in advance.
If you’ve only been here 13 months I don’t think you will be holding a line on LGA/777 in a year, most jr lineholder now is 103XX. Maybe a lineholder in 3 years. WB goes so senior here at AA bc we don’t have anymore G3 aircraft.
Dunkin is offline  
Old 11-24-2022, 10:21 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,352
Default

Can’t comment on the lifestyle at AA, but I retired 5 years ago off the C-17 and UAL has been the easiest job I could ever imagine. I commute and work as little as possible. Our reserve rules suck, but if you are local, they really don’t matter. New hires have been getting CLE recently, so while there’s no guarantee that they will in the future, it’s not the seniority fortress it once was.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 11-25-2022, 02:56 PM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Dunkin View Post
If you’ve only been here 13 months I don’t think you will be holding a line on LGA/777 in a year, most jr lineholder now is 103XX. Maybe a lineholder in 3 years. WB goes so senior here at AA bc we don’t have anymore G3 aircraft.
Yeah he’s not gonna hold 777 FO at all, much less a line.
SoloPilot is offline  
Old 11-25-2022, 05:16 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 241
Default

Originally Posted by thayer7th View Post
I can't believe I'm making one of these threads.

34 years old. 13 months at AA, live in NE Ohio, fly the C-17 close by, have 8 years left to 20 for the military retirement.

Bidding 20% NYC FO on narrow body, very easy commute, but still a commute, decent schedule for a year on property, could be a line holding 777 FO in another year in NYC, have thought about bidding 737 captain when I wouldn't be the very bottom. We all know AA's pros and shortcomings so I'll save the typing. Was planning on moving to a senior AA base and commuting the military gig eventually.

Have the opportunity to jump to United where I can drive to work at CLE or commute to ORD for a better run airline with more wide bodies and a desire to not be the worlds largest regional.

Obviously contract 2023 is the big unknown for both places. Frankly I am keeping my FedEx app updated, but that's a pipe dream at best.

Thoughts?

Thanks in advance.
I'd stay at AA but that's just me. UAL is a better run airline right now. They haven't always been and you never know what the future holds. It's not always been great over there but it seems like they have turned a corner. Time will tell. But if you're not going to be happy at AA then bail.
J3nkums is offline  
Old 11-25-2022, 05:27 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 241
Default

Originally Posted by thayer7th View Post
It's not even about how I feel, I'm just being objective when looking at our route network, half the widebodies and not really a significant west coast presence. That and the last proposed TA essentially added airport standby.

I'm not trying to offend anyone, I'm trying to make a decision.

Thank you all.
Everything that you claim about AA that sucks or needs to be improved on are valid to a point but you're looking at a snapshot in time. AA management will change. Culture will change will a new generation of pilots. No one as a clue what AAs fleet will look like in 20 years in regards to WBs, etc. If want to go to UAL because it's the current hotness then go for it... but the grass isn't always greener.
J3nkums is offline  
Old 11-25-2022, 07:33 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 378
Default

Been here 5 yrs and cant hold a 777 line
Armyguy is offline  
Old 11-26-2022, 01:58 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,745
Default

Originally Posted by J3nkums View Post
Everything that you claim about AA that sucks or needs to be improved on are valid to a point but you're looking at a snapshot in time. AA management will change. Culture will change will a new generation of pilots. No one as a clue what AAs fleet will look like in 20 years in regards to WBs, etc. If want to go to UAL because it's the current hotness then go for it... but the grass isn't always greener.
No dog in this fight, pilots have to make decisions for themselves and their situation, but I would say over the last 30yrs I've been around this business, AA's mgmt has consistently been the most harshest on it's pilots.

AA has come ALONG way, but they used to charge their own pilots for non-rev until a certain point and would even charge their own pilots to use the Jumpseat if a seat in back was open.

I knew a pilot that when hired by Eagle and based in SJU, cost HIM money to go sit reserve cause AA charged him for the non-rev to/from work and international taxes plus crash pad, etc. Net result was negative income flow.

During the furloughs of 2001, they used to do "no notice" furloughs where CPO met the plane at the gate and collected the unsuspecting FO's ID, a friend of mine had to use a buddy pass to get home. I think this was in an attempt to avoid too many just using sick time before furlough (if they announced it earlier).

After furlough, AA cut off all travel benefits, so if you were a drilling reservists that had moved to your AA domicile, too bad, so sad. They stood out in their harshness almost like they never expected or wanted their furloughed pilots to return.
nene is offline  
Old 11-26-2022, 02:42 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by nene View Post
No dog in this fight, pilots have to make decisions for themselves and their situation, but I would say over the last 30yrs I've been around this business, AA's mgmt has consistently been the most harshest on it's pilots.

AA has come ALONG way, but they used to charge their own pilots for non-rev until a certain point and would even charge their own pilots to use the Jumpseat if a seat in back was open.

I knew a pilot that when hired by Eagle and based in SJU, cost HIM money to go sit reserve cause AA charged him for the non-rev to/from work and international taxes plus crash pad, etc. Net result was negative income flow.

During the furloughs of 2001, they used to do "no notice" furloughs where CPO met the plane at the gate and collected the unsuspecting FO's ID, a friend of mine had to use a buddy pass to get home. I think this was in an attempt to avoid too many just using sick time before furlough (if they announced it earlier).

After furlough, AA cut off all travel benefits, so if you were a drilling reservists that had moved to your AA domicile, too bad, so sad. They stood out in their harshness almost like they never expected or wanted their furloughed pilots to return.
That's not ever legal per the WARN Act, which requires 60 days notice.

Unless of course they were immediately furloughed and then given 60 days of time off with pay.
Earthboundmsfit is offline  
Old 11-26-2022, 03:49 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
Default

The WARN Act is not activated when a covered employer:

If a plant closing or a mass layoff results in fewer than 50 workers losing their jobs at a single employment site;

It 50 to 499 workers lose their jobs and that number is less than 33% of the employer's total, active workforce at a single employment site;

That shouldnt be hard to work around
Brickfire is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommutAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
joe hokie
SkyWest
31
03-23-2016 09:56 AM
hockeypilot44
Delta
163
10-24-2015 05:32 PM
DoubleTrouble
Major
12
05-25-2012 09:06 AM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices