![]() |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034621)
And what boys? Iran didn’t kill any US soldier recently until after Feb 28. And the 6 that died in the same day was a midair collision, not Iranian military action that shot them down.
|
Originally Posted by Lowslung
(Post 4034630)
Hey man, you make some good posts & when it comes to the FL350 view, you and I are largely in agreement. However, in the interest of intellectual integrity, I’ve got to stop you there. Iran has, in fact, been a very bad actor in the region for a long time. They have given direct support in the form of cash, weapons, training, and advisement & even direct leadership to proxies in the region who have directly engaged US forces on myriad occasions. Hell, sometimes the “proxies” are little more than badly disguised Iranian irregular forces. While I think, as I believe you do, that the current operation was ill conceived and poorly executed & will create more problems than it solves, make no mistake, there have been plenty of recent reasons to engage the regime kinetically. I just wish we would’ve been smarter about it as I believe we will not achieve our objectives there anytime soon. About the KC-135 “collision”, we have seen no official confirmation that that’s what happened. You may be a bit premature in your assessment.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 4034588)
If you bothered to watch the Israeli PM on 60 mins last night, he made their position clear in a way which leaves little doubt on Iran, Iran’s proxies, growing progress with other Arab governments and rejection of a non binding no nuke treaty. Let’s face it, Iran is a headless Islamic jihad state with the supreme inner circle now decimated. Who knows how long such volatility may last or when resumption of semi-routine gulf trade may occur. |
Originally Posted by jacinth
(Post 4034151)
we had Italy’s data in March 2020. We knew then lockdowns, before the first one in LA April 7th, were completely unnecessary and would be net damaging. By July we had all the data on masking we needed documented in every country you could look at that masking had no impact whatsoever on spread. We had N95 data from Germany indicating the same. This data would remain consistent for the entirety of Covid. As for the Vaccine, there is no solid data anywhere showing it had any effect at reducing deaths or spread. In fact, look at the transmission rates prior and after vaccine campaign implementation in countries all over the world. The “vaccine” caused spread, by an exponential margin. even in 3rd world countries the data is irrefutable. It is highly likely the vaccine caused a net increase in deaths over any theoretically saved. I say theoretically because there isn’t actually anything solid to be able to argue it saved any lives at all. On top of the well documented severe side effects. Science is data driven. It isn’t hopium wrapped up in fear biased modeling.
|
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 4034607)
From the article...."...And it doesn’t help that two of the state’s major refineries closed in the past six months, cutting off almost one-fifth of its fuel-making capacity. Even if the strait reopens soon, its closure has already withheld at least 1 billion barrels from the global market, analysts say. ...
and... "We are doing everything we can to meet our supply obligations there,” Wirth said. “But it does point out the vulnerabilities that have been created in California as a result of decades of poor energy policy.” And now they get to blame it on DJT, just in time for the midterms. Not sure why he didn't let them lie in the bed they made for a while and do Iran after midterms :confused: |
Originally Posted by Lowslung
(Post 4034630)
Hey man, you make some good posts & when it comes to the FL350 view, you and I are largely in agreement. However, in the interest of intellectual integrity, I’ve got to stop you there. Iran has, in fact, been a very bad actor in the region for a long time. They have given direct support in the form of cash, weapons, training, and advisement & even direct leadership to proxies in the region who have directly engaged US forces on myriad occasions. Hell, sometimes the “proxies” are little more than badly disguised Iranian irregular forces. While I think, as I believe you do, that the current operation was ill conceived and poorly executed & will create more problems than it solves, make no mistake, there have been plenty of recent reasons to engage the regime kinetically. I just wish we would’ve been smarter about it as I believe we will not achieve our objectives there anytime soon. About the KC-135 “collision”, we have seen no official confirmation that that’s what happened. You may be a bit premature in your assessment.
Sure. But we are talking US soldiers. A very limited amount have died in the ME, excluding the Iraq (and Syria) wars . So, what incident are we accusing Iran of murdering U.S. soldiers? How about 30+ U.S. Navy sailors by Israel as a “oops.” Can you imagine if Iran did an oops that killed 30+ U.S. soldiers? Or shot down an airliner that killed 290 U.S. citizens? When it comes to engagement, we seem to have done way more to them than they ever did. Besides, what group specifically armed by Iran killed US citizens? Maybe the Yemen Houthis but they have hit locals around them, not Americans. Engaging them kinetically means drop bombs in Tehran. That, I disagree with. Yet another useless war. Like anything, follow the money. Any vocal US politician for the attacks on Iran, study their bank accounts and see how much AIPAC money they took. The Ted Cruz types. Who when interviewed by Tucker of all people, gave cowardly answers with zero actual knowledge about the country of Iran. |
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 4034636)
Spicy, cinco peppers picante.
If you bothered to watch the Israeli PM on 60 mins last night, he made their position clear in a way which leaves little doubt on Iran, Iran’s proxies, growing progress with other Arab governments and rejection of a non binding no nuke treaty. Let’s face it, Iran is a headless Islamic jihad state with the supreme inner circle now decimated. Who knows how long such volatility may last or when resumption of semi-routine gulf trade may occur. |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034650)
How about 30+ U.S. Navy sailors by Israel as a “oops.”
It is a good example of why not to trust IL to exercise restraint, but that's the extent of the significance.
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034650)
Or shot down an airliner that killed 290 U.S. citizens?
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4034654)
That was adjudicated an accident. After we drove a spy ship into a hot war zone. Fog of war happens. Yawn.
It is a good example of why not to trust IL to exercise restraint, but that's the extent of the significance. Iran started a battle with US naval forces, and they flew an airliner right into it. Fog of war happens. Yawn. By the way, “they” needs to be a distinction between the military of Iran, versus civilian airliner who has nothing to do with the nonsense going on in the SOH. The Americans had access to flight schedule pamphlets, a screen that showed the airplane clearly climbing away at 250 knots, not diving. And no, they weren’t monitoring 121.5. Bandar Abbas to Dubai is a short flight. Radio #2 would have have been busy getting weather, company ops, in range, etc. Not to mention, the F14 was not a carrier/destroyer attack aircraft with how they had them equipped. But “fog of war” are some (not all) of a certain type of person I see in my CCW class. The ones who are sprung and ready, literally looking for a reason to shoot and legally kill someone. Thankfully one time there was a certain Russian commander who was able to not be confused with fog of war, use a clear rational sound mind, and decide that he was not looking at 5 real nukes in his screen headed towards Russia from America. |
History is written by the victors. Victors can adjudicate whatever they feel was an accident. The victim side, the loser in that case, has no say.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034621)
A deal made after two 8 yr predecessors did not. It would NOT have led to a nuke already, that is pure falsehood. The billion in cash was already THEIR money. And you’re going to have to show evidence that cash was trailed to make EFP IEDs that maimed and killed our boys. And what boys? Iran didn’t kill any US soldier recently until after Feb 28. And the 6 that died in the same day was a midair collision, not Iranian military action that shot them down.
. |
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4034500)
Europe is free to step up. Ohh wait, they can't. Two decades of Left/Socialist policies have left them economically and politically crippled. They are become more irrelevant by the year.
|
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
(Post 4034663)
the eu is our largest trading partner lol……. Maybe read a bit and not just watch your partisan reels to get your information
|
Originally Posted by MaxQ
(Post 4034506)
Do you not know who Robert Kagan is?
Are you unfamiliar with his writings and what he is known for? You vote? How sweet. Here's a lolly pop. Your vote is exactly equal to those of the 54% or so of Americans who read below a 6th grade level. 20% are functionally illiterate. The Kagan Clan understands how power and influence works. As does the Kristol clan. (Despise them both. But I don't understand power or influence either, so I guess this is what we get) |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034656)
By the way, “they” needs to be a distinction between the military of Iran, versus civilian airliner who has nothing to do with the nonsense going on in the SOH.
The FAA would have closed any such airspace to US aircraft.
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034656)
The Americans had access to flight schedule pamphlets, a screen that showed the airplane clearly climbing away at 250 knots, not diving. And no, they weren’t monitoring 121.5. Bandar Abbas to Dubai is a short flight. Radio #2 would have have been busy getting weather, company ops, in range, etc. Not to mention, the F14 was not a carrier/destroyer attack aircraft with how they had them equipped.
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034656)
But “fog of war” are some (not all) of a certain type of person I see in my CCW class. The ones who are sprung and ready, literally looking for a reason to shoot and legally kill someone.
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 4034660)
Iran increased its support for DA terrorism as well as through its proxies following the passage of the JCPOA. This isn’t a secret.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4034690)
They literally flew right into it. The IR government let them do it. No sympathy.
The FAA would have closed any such airspace to US aircraft. And “they” did not know of the escalation down there. Chasing down small boats against orders is not something that was anticipated. Monday morning QB is easy, especially when you have the enemy talking points and no combat experience and no military experience. Are we talking about a road-raging redneck in a pickup truck? Or geoplitical affairs? |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4034647)
Yes CA politicians absolutely created a fuel shortage (all the ones we care about gas, diesel, kerosene).
And now they get to blame it on DJT, just in time for the midterms. Not sure why he didn't let them lie in the bed they made for a while and do Iran after midterms :confused: It actually is Trumps fault my dude. Anyone who cannot see that truly needs to turn off Fox. |
Originally Posted by MaxQ
(Post 4034506)
Do you not know who Robert Kagan is?
Are you unfamiliar with his writings and what he is known for? https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...-iraq-war.html Just as an example of one easily findable article. Weird, his wiki seems to omit such things..... |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034694)
It ended in 2018. So what are you referring to? “Iran attacks via proxies” is a trending term on podcasts and right wing media. Weird how that works.
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 4034717)
So you are saying that Iran hasn’t trained Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and others for decades? And by after the JCPOA, I’m talking about 2015-18 while it was in effect. I know…crazy what happens when you release billions to a terrorist regime.
Hamad, Houthis, Hezbollah. The three Hs. Just more podcast and right wing talking points. The typical American has no clue what they are. Reminds me of when Hegseth and Vance said that they need to frame this to the public differently, because no one knows who Houthis are or where Yemen is. |
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 4034717)
So you are saying that Iran hasn’t trained Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and others for decades? And by after the JCPOA, I’m talking about 2015-18 while it was in effect. I know…crazy what happens when you release billions to a terrorist regime.
I feel like I really didn't care about them and neither did 99.9% of Americans who just wanted to live their life here and buy cheap gas who never planned to travel to Palestine. |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034724)
And 2018-present was different, how? It was after 2018 when Trump killed the Obama deal that Iran went unchecked.
Hamad, Houthis, Hezbollah. The three Hs. Just more podcast and right wing talking points. The typical American has no clue what they are. Reminds me of when Hegseth and Vance said that they need to frame this to the public differently, because no one knows who Houthis are or where Yemen is. 2018-present would be that they have less money to do so (and getting less by the day). Terrorist groups are talking points. That’s a new take. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 4034732)
Sounds like an Israeli problem, not a US problem. Or were. Now they are a US problem too. More terrorist enemies, super great!
I feel like I really didn't care about them and neither did 99.9% of Americans who just wanted to live their life here and buy cheap gas who never planned to travel to Palestine. You can only push a country so far(oil embargoes agsint Japan) before they will retaliate. Kinda like that? |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034650)
Sure. But we are talking US soldiers. A very limited amount have died in the ME, excluding the Iraq (and Syria) wars . So, what incident are we accusing Iran of murdering U.S. soldiers?
|
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 4034732)
Sounds like an Israeli problem, not a US problem. Or were. Now they are a US problem too. More terrorist enemies, super great!
I feel like I really didn't care about them and neither did 99.9% of Americans who just wanted to live their life here and buy cheap gas who never planned to travel to Palestine. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4034690)
They literally flew right into it. The IR government let them do it. No sympathy.
|
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 4034742)
Kinda like the USA proking Japan with oil embargoes prior the WWII. I mean they wernt doing anything to us and Britain had been at war for 2 years before we brought Japan's warranted actions on Pearl Harbor. We should have just stayed out of that....nobody was bothering us.
You can only push a country so far(oil embargoes agsint Japan) before they will retaliate. Kinda like that? |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 4034747)
I don't remember Iran attacking Pearl Harbor, do you have a link?
|
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 4034755)
In concept true actually. Magnum PI season 3. Higgins was brainwashed by a sultry Persian princess who tried to use Zeus & Apollo for a diversion to hijack some poorly protected boomer docked at pearl.
|
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 4034755)
In concept true actually. Magnum PI season 3. Higgins was brainwashed by a sultry Persian princess who tried to use Zeus & Apollo for a diversion to hijack some poorly protected boomer docked at pearl.
Filler………. |
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
(Post 4034746)
That is, quite simply, a gross misrepresentation of what actually happened. The US government officially attempted to blame it on Iran, but the facts of that occurrence point overwhelmingly point to huge mistakes on the part of the US cruiser that blew them up, similar to how Russians shot down an airliner a few years ago, the Soviets shot down KAL 007 and we shot down an F-18 just a few months ago. You really need to go back and read the story of what happened. Just like all those other governments screwed one up, we screwed this one up.
I actually knew some of the folks involved. The CO was aggressive, but he was also in combat and entitled to protect his ship and crew if in doubt. There is always fog of war, even more so when the engagement is happening in the middle of densely populated water and airways. No sympathy, Iran should have just canceled commercial flights over the gulf while they were attacking US forces. I'm pretty sure the regime kind of hoped something like that would happen. They definitely did not mind when it did. You work for the FAA, you know darn well that WE would have closed the airspace, not just kept launching unwitting martyrs into the line of fire. There were lessons learned for future reference. But the powers that be didn't monday morning QB the guy. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 4034747)
I don't remember Iran attacking Pearl Harbor, do you have a link?
|
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4034498)
The Atlantic lol. Might as well have come from the Ayatollah himself.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4034650)
Sure. But we are talking US soldiers. A very limited amount have died in the ME, excluding the Iraq (and Syria) wars . So, what incident are we accusing Iran of murdering U.S. soldiers?
How about 30+ U.S. Navy sailors by Israel as a “oops.” Can you imagine if Iran did an oops that killed 30+ U.S. soldiers? Or shot down an airliner that killed 290 U.S. citizens? When it comes to engagement, we seem to have done way more to them than they ever did. Besides, what group specifically armed by Iran killed US citizens? Maybe the Yemen Houthis but they have hit locals around them, not Americans. Engaging them kinetically means drop bombs in Tehran. That, I disagree with. Yet another useless war. Like anything, follow the money. Any vocal US politician for the attacks on Iran, study their bank accounts and see how much AIPAC money they took. The Ted Cruz types. Who when interviewed by Tucker of all people, gave cowardly answers with zero actual knowledge about the country of Iran. Where do you want to start? We can go back to the 1983 Marine Barracks in Beirut... 241 Marines, or how about the Beirut Embassy Bombings? You want to exclude Iraq? Why? You can’t discuss Iranian kinetic engagement while ignoring the Quds Force and the EFPs that accounted for hundreds of U.S. casualties. Those weren't 'accidents'; they were targeted. And no, contrary to what people believe in your native Pakistan, our country and our military do not deliberately shoot down airliners full of innocent civilians. You're comparing a tragic fog-of-war accident to deliberate targeting of US and Israeli civilians. Funny how you also conveniently omit that the US paid $131 million in compensation for the accident. Do you recall Iran ever paying any compensation for their terror activities throughout the decades or say.... Khobar Towers bombing that killed 19 US airmen? I sure don't. As for 'following the money,' it is a cliché, lazy, and pathetic pivot to AIPAC. It’s ironic that you’ve built a career as a pilot in the US while still clutching the same anti-American tropes and regional biases you were raised with..... you are deliberately dismissing a documented trail of American blood just to protect that narrative. |
Originally Posted by Lowslung
(Post 4034764)
Exquisite.
Filler………. https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/cut.gif |
Originally Posted by Ice Bear
(Post 4034789)
Hegseth thought enough of the publication to include them in upcoming classified war plans. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-plans/682151/
|
Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
(Post 4034805)
Where do you want to start? We can go back to the 1983 Marine Barracks in Beirut... 241 Marines, or how about the Beirut Embassy Bombings? You want to exclude Iraq? Why? You can’t discuss Iranian kinetic engagement while ignoring the Quds Force and the EFPs that accounted for hundreds of U.S. casualties. Those weren't 'accidents'; they were targeted. And no, contrary to what people believe in your native Pakistan, our country and our military do not deliberately shoot down airliners full of innocent civilians. You're comparing a tragic fog-of-war accident to deliberate targeting of US and Israeli civilians. Funny how you also conveniently omit that the US paid $131 million in compensation for the accident. Do you recall Iran ever paying any compensation for their terror activities throughout the decades or say.... Khobar Towers bombing that killed 19 US airmen? I sure don't.
As for 'following the money,' it is a cliché, lazy, and pathetic pivot to AIPAC. It’s ironic that you’ve built a career as a pilot in the US while still clutching the same anti-American tropes and regional biases you were raised with..... you are deliberately dismissing a documented trail of American blood just to protect that narrative. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4034771)
BS narrative that evolved after the fact.
I actually knew some of the folks involved. The CO was aggressive, but he was also in combat and entitled to protect his ship and crew if in doubt. There is always fog of war, even more so when the engagement is happening in the middle of densely populated water and airways. No sympathy, Iran should have just canceled commercial flights over the gulf while they were attacking US forces. I'm pretty sure the regime kind of hoped something like that would happen. They definitely did not mind when it did. You work for the FAA, you know darn well that WE would have closed the airspace, not just kept launching unwitting martyrs into the line of fire. There were lessons learned for future reference. But the powers that be didn't monday morning QB the guy. |
Thanks for clearing that up. I was literally going to ask him he was from that part of the world. Explains a lot.
Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
(Post 4034805)
Where do you want to start? We can go back to the 1983 Marine Barracks in Beirut... 241 Marines, or how about the Beirut Embassy Bombings? You want to exclude Iraq? Why? You can’t discuss Iranian kinetic engagement while ignoring the Quds Force and the EFPs that accounted for hundreds of U.S. casualties. Those weren't 'accidents'; they were targeted. And no, contrary to what people believe in your native Pakistan, our country and our military do not deliberately shoot down airliners full of innocent civilians. You're comparing a tragic fog-of-war accident to deliberate targeting of US and Israeli civilians. Funny how you also conveniently omit that the US paid $131 million in compensation for the accident. Do you recall Iran ever paying any compensation for their terror activities throughout the decades or say.... Khobar Towers bombing that killed 19 US airmen? I sure don't.
As for 'following the money,' it is a cliché, lazy, and pathetic pivot to AIPAC. It’s ironic that you’ve built a career as a pilot in the US while still clutching the same anti-American tropes and regional biases you were raised with..... you are deliberately dismissing a documented trail of American blood just to protect that narrative. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:00 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands