Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
NTSB faults SWA, pilots >

NTSB faults SWA, pilots

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

NTSB faults SWA, pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2007 | 08:17 AM
  #51  
flaps 9's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: 737 F/O
Default

Lots of blame going on.

No one mentions the role of the airport authority.

Maybe if Joe Petroni and his boys were on the job we wouldn't have had this situation to begin with.

How about some regulation requiring airports to provide a surface that is useable.

Increase staffing and equipment so that runways are cleared more frequently during storms.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 08:28 AM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FliFast
Also, what was this that the Capt tried the T/Rs then the F/O tried them ??? Transfer of control on the landing rollout at apparent high speed regime..is that true ???
It wasn't a transfer of control. The Captain was unable to deploy the thrust reversers for unknown reasons. The F/O then tried and was successful. I'm trying to find out if the reason for the Captain's inability to deploy the T/Rs has been determined.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 08:28 AM
  #53  
av8r4aa's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Lazy-boy Captain
Default I remember second grade

Gentlemen,

I think its past time to quit beating up the SWA pilots.

Coulda, shoulda, woulda is what you say leaving Las Vegas.

Lets all remember what the second grade teacher said.

" If you don't have anything NICE to say then don't say anything."
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 08:44 AM
  #54  
kronan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default

From reading the Board Presentations, I surmise that the Capt did not deploy the TRs due to a change in habit patterns resulting from the change between Autobrakes and Manual Brakes procedures. SWA training was cited for minimal training (sounds like none to me) on using the Autobrakes. Presentations indicated that SWA crews reported a delay activating the TRs for the first few times they used Autobrakes.
There were no mechanical problems found with the plane, and if you watch the presentation, the TRs deployed with about 1200 feet left and started working w/ about 900 feet left

One of the recommendations is a requirement for the PNF to confirm depoloyment of the TRs after landing. Sure hope that doesn't happen.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 09:01 AM
  #55  
Polarfr8dog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: 320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by FliFast
Does SWA incorporate the use of thrust reversers in calculating landing distance...I thought landing distance was always calculated without the use of T/Rs.

FF
According to the ATW article -- not me -- they use T/R's in their landing performance data. It's posted on page five of this thread. I thought the same thing and then I read the article.

As I have never flown the -700 and only typed in the the other, I don't know why they would not have been able to. If it's like the Boeing I currently fly then they will not deploy unless the throttle is in the idle position prior to deployment. So if they're not "sitting" against the stops we can jerk on them all day and they're not coming out. Well, they're not supposed to anyway.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 09:34 AM
  #56  
SWAcapt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: B737, Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by FliFast
Does SWA incorporate the use of thrust reversers in calculating landing distance...I thought landing distance was always calculated without the use of T/Rs.
FF
Most of us thought the same thing. On the day of the mishap, I was of the belief that all turbojet/turbofan airliners were certified with stopping data that did not include the use of t/r's and that they were added 'gravy'. I have since heard that that data in our onboard performance computers (OPC) for our -300s does not account for the use of reverse thrust (SWA software product). I heard that the -700s did use the effects of reverse thrust and that this is a Boeing software product. I do not know to this date if the -700 certified stopping distances use t/r effect or if they just added it to the OPC software to increase the performance perception. Perhaps a Boeing engineer or someone with an actual Boeing 737NG flight manual could enlighten us.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 09:42 AM
  #57  
flaps 9's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: 737 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by kronan

One of the recommendations is a requirement for the PNF to confirm depoloyment of the TRs after landing. Sure hope that doesn't happen.

It's no big deal, just a callout. Lots of operators have a callout where the PNF confirms operation of TR'S.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 10:14 AM
  #58  
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: B737/Capt
Default

Originally Posted by kronan
From reading the Board Presentations, I surmise that the Capt did not deploy the TRs due to a change in habit patterns resulting from the change between Autobrakes and Manual Brakes procedures. SWA training was cited for minimal training (sounds like none to me) on using the Autobrakes. Presentations indicated that SWA crews reported a delay activating the TRs for the first few times they used Autobrakes.
There were no mechanical problems found with the plane, and if you watch the presentation, the TRs deployed with about 1200 feet left and started working w/ about 900 feet left

One of the recommendations is a requirement for the PNF to confirm depoloyment of the TRs after landing. Sure hope that doesn't happen.
Kronan,

Good post!

I would even say that the first time I used the A/B I hesitated a significant number of seconds before deploying the TR's. My habit pattern was strictly set for manual braking and I am sure glad it wasn't at MDW in poor conditions.

Last edited by OscartheGrouch; 10-04-2007 at 01:28 PM.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 10:24 AM
  #59  
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: B737/Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Yet again you are typo-ing. UAL did not furlough during the first gulf war. We were one of the few that did not furlough pilots during that period.
LB,

I never said UAL furloughed during the first Gulf war. If you would calm down and reread my posts on this thread, I said I didn't fit their (UAL's) hiring profile in 1988. Of course after my unforgivable mistake (1995 vs 1985) in reference to the Strike I meant I didn't want to work in an unhealthy environment with regards to the strike breakers on property.

Once again if my wife can't help you she probably could give you a psychologist's name and number in your area.
Reply
Old 10-04-2007 | 10:32 AM
  #60  
Lambourne's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
From: B777 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by flaps 9
It's no big deal, just a callout. Lots of operators have a callout where the PNF confirms operation of TR'S.
You guys don't currently have a confirmation that the TR's are unlocked and in use? How do you prevent an asymmetrical selection of Reverse beyond idle?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
Sir James
Cargo
71
04-03-2012 11:11 AM
AFPirate
Major
38
01-17-2008 02:46 PM
FDX aviator
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 11:00 AM
Sr. Barco
Major
34
07-31-2007 01:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices