Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Legacy pay comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2007, 09:08 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by SWAcapt View Post
nK, just to clarify a misunderstanding, I DO think that we should ask for higher pay. Looking at your peer group that is making more is only one of many tools in the negotiation tool box. Wasn't it United that asked for Delta+ 1% or vice-versa? We have plenty of other justifications, just not the 'other guys are making more' one this time. I truly hope we can all negotiate better contracts.
SWA,

Ok. I thought you were saying that you guys couldn't justify asking for higher pay at all. It's all cleared up in my book.
newKnow is offline  
Old 10-30-2007, 09:52 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
Default

Originally Posted by Futureman View Post
What heavy lifting? SWA is leading the way in narrow body pay. You should thank SWA for setting the narrow body pay bar so high. It gives you guys something to shoot for.
PMFJI, but it was stated earlier that SWA's contract was negotiated in '95. They did not set the bar higher than other carriers at that time. IIRC, UAL's contract pre-C2K topped SWA on narrow body pay. So for you to state that SWA set the narrow body pay at a high level is truly distorting the facts.
Andy is offline  
Old 10-30-2007, 01:15 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Futureman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 100
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
PMFJI, but it was stated earlier that SWA's contract was negotiated in '95. They did not set the bar higher than other carriers at that time. IIRC, UAL's contract pre-C2K topped SWA on narrow body pay. So for you to state that SWA set the narrow body pay at a high level is truly distorting the facts.
I never said that SWA set the narrow body pay standard. I'm saying that they currently are the standard. I'm saying that United should be happy that the bar remains high at SWA. It gives their negotiators something to shoot for, or surpass.
Futureman is offline  
Old 10-30-2007, 03:17 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: B737/Capt
Posts: 998
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
PMFJI, but it was stated earlier that SWA's contract was negotiated in '95. They did not set the bar higher than other carriers at that time. IIRC, UAL's contract pre-C2K topped SWA on narrow body pay. So for you to state that SWA set the narrow body pay at a high level is truly distorting the facts.
Andy,

Your are back? I will be watching for the continuous misinformation presented by your UAL compadres (not you of course). Just standing by!
OscartheGrouch is offline  
Old 10-30-2007, 03:21 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: B737/Capt
Posts: 998
Default

Originally Posted by 7576United View Post
Delta got United plus one. Honestly, I'm surprised you don't know the story of United's summer of 2000.

Southwest's contract became amendable over a year ago. What is the current status of negotiations? Has your union leadership come forward with a proprosal? Has a strike preparation committee been formed? I'm curious as to why your pilot group isn't banging the drum to get the talks jumpstarted, or are you satisfied with what your current contract?
The summer of 2000 was not pretty! I lived through it as well as your previous customers and many of your fellow employees. Was it a nightmare or what?

Please don't concern yourself too much about our contract negotiatons. Rest assured that we will raise the bar for SWA and our employees and not a bunch of ME First types!

Last edited by OscartheGrouch; 10-30-2007 at 03:26 PM.
OscartheGrouch is offline  
Old 10-30-2007, 05:05 PM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch View Post
The summer of 2000 was not pretty! I lived through it as well as your previous customers and many of your fellow employees. Was it a nightmare or what?

Please don't concern yourself too much about our contract negotiatons. Rest assured that we will raise the bar for SWA and our employees and not a bunch of ME First types!
I wish I didn't have to concern myself with your negotiations, but, unfortunately, as your colleague pointed out, we are all involved in pattern bargaining. Therefore, what happens to you directly affects what happens to us. If that makes me a "ME FIRST", so be it.
7576United is offline  
Old 10-30-2007, 08:55 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Default

>>PMFJI, but it was stated earlier that SWA's contract was negotiated in '95. They did not set the bar higher than other carriers at that time<<

That is not exactly true. SWA's rates today have very little to do with the old contract. Post 9/11, while everyone else was doing give backs, SWA/SWAPA negotiated an extension agreement that established today's rates. Even though it was technically an extension of the previous contract, the agreement had the highest pay rate increases of any previous SWA contract plus a multitude of improvements in many other areas, more so even than the original contract it extended.
Widow's Son is offline  
Old 10-30-2007, 09:05 PM
  #48  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

My regional is going to set the bar. Better watch out.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:47 AM
  #49  
Gets Off
 
md11phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Nordskog Industries Field Technician
Posts: 688
Default

Originally Posted by Metal121 View Post
Jealousy is a *****...sorry your career choices didnt work out.

Sleep well...and maybe you'll get hired next year. Practice your interview skills though....SWA doesnt hire dweebs.

peace
Oh, if you only knew how funny it was to read that from a 50 hour CDG layover...

Furthermore, if you work at SWA then your second quote is a bit of an oxymoron.

My point is that pay isn't everything, some folks prefer a different schedule after they've done the up and down domestic stuff.

Good luck guys, and try to remember we're all on the same team here.
md11phlyer is offline  
Old 10-31-2007, 02:56 AM
  #50  
La Familia Delta
 
ghilis101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 2,467
Default

yea where is this thread going exactly. Why trash SWA for being the highest paid 737 carrier? Sure it must be horrible to fly all those legs till the day you retire. Im a one to two-leg kind of guy myself (although its cold here in amsterdam cant wait to leave).

As for the legacies, whos going to be the first the pave the road to recovery with the equivalent of a Fdx/UPS +1 contract?
ghilis101 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FNG320
JetBlue
25
08-13-2021 12:43 PM
L'il J.Seinfeld
Military
39
03-08-2013 02:45 PM
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
jetfuel4blood
Corporate
1
08-14-2007 05:03 AM
jetfuel4blood
Part 135
0
08-01-2007 10:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices