Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ALPA decertification at US Airways >

ALPA decertification at US Airways

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ALPA decertification at US Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2007 | 06:23 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilotss
Yes the countries of Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are complete wrecks.
In many aspects they are!
Reply
Old 11-23-2007 | 07:14 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
I goota chime in Hear. What would you have The President of ALPA do in the case of an ALPA to ALPA merger? (i.e AWA and USAir).
Should he have taken sides and supported East Pilots over West?

Look I am extremely sympathetic to the USAir East because what happend to them could happen to anyone of us at a moments notice.

The bulk of what happend at USAir East was out of the USAir MEC and ALPA National's control.

The merger with AWest/ USAir was out of both MEC's and ALPA National's control. Doug Parker, The BOD and the Shareholders were in control.

The Seniority Integration was, however, between the MEC's of USAir and America West, and because both sides agreed to Binding Arbitration, was ultimately in the hands of Mr. Nicholau the Arbitrator. With 20/20 Hindsight, I am sure that USAir East pilots would not have agreed to Binding arbitration or would have at least altered their strategy/ demands. But we would all be Billionaires with 20/20 hindsight wouldn't we........except us Pilots that is

ALPA National cannot choose sides in a merger between 2 ALPA represented groups.

Ditto

And another thing, Instead of trying to dump ALPA, why not dump the MEC that lead the Easties into BINDING arbitration and then failed to heed the arbiters advice to bring a different proposal after he rejected their date of hire proposal for the third time?

No matter what else is said, both sides agreed to binding arbitration, nothing else really matters. After Alaska took a huge pay cut at the hands of an arbitrator, I thought that pilot groups would avoid arbitrators like they had the plague. Oh well.
Reply
Old 11-23-2007 | 07:15 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

8r, I'm thinking that the merger policy should be more defined from the get go .. no big surprises to anybody.....
Reply
Old 11-23-2007 | 08:40 PM
  #94  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreighterGuyNow
Filed with the NMB today. 3000 cards - 98% participation.


http://usairlinepilots.org/


Idiot Morons

Originally Posted by Boneman
Idiot Morons
Boneman,

Funny you should use the word "idiot" to describe the US Air pilots with 98% participation, when the word comes from the Greeks to describe someone who won't participate in democracy and the political process......
Reply
Old 11-23-2007 | 09:30 PM
  #95  
TheBaron's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Quote:
Boneman,

Funny you should use the word "idiot" to describe the US Air pilots with 98% participation, when the word comes from the Greeks to describe someone who won't participate in democracy and the political process......
Are you making that up? According to my Oxford dictionary:
ORIGIN Greek idiotes ‘layman, ignorant person’, from idios ‘own’.
Reply
Old 11-23-2007 | 09:57 PM
  #96  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron
Are you making that up? According to my Oxford dictionary:
ORIGIN Greek idiotes ‘layman, ignorant person’, from idios ‘own’.
Nope. I saw it on a show about History of Athens and democracy (yes, I was bored). Wikipedia kind of goes into it too.

Google; "History of the word idiot," then click on "dictionary of word origins. "
Reply
Old 11-25-2007 | 07:56 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by filejw
8r, I'm thinking that the merger policy should be more defined from the get go .. no big surprises to anybody.....
That would be hard to do given the wide variety of possible mergers. I can't imagine that there could be a single one size fits all merger policy that doesn't have a great deal of latitude.

The Nicolau award keeps everyone effectively in the same relative position they had prior to the merger with the exception of 500+ AAA pilots that were moved to the top of the combined list. A senior 737 captain is still a senior 737 captain. A junior A320 first officer is still a junior A320 first officer. Had the award gone with the AAA DOH/LOS plan, junior furloughed pilots at AAA would suddenly become senior to line holding captains at AWA.
Reply
Old 11-25-2007 | 09:13 AM
  #98  
41DS's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: F-5,737
Default

Why not just take the date of hire and go from there? That seems like the most fair way to merge. Is there something I am missing here?
Reply
Old 11-25-2007 | 09:58 AM
  #99  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: tri current
Default

Originally Posted by 41DS
Why not just take the date of hire and go from there? That seems like the most fair way to merge. Is there something I am missing here?
Yes, you are missing out on human nature. Specifically greed.

The Nicolau award keeps everyone effectively in the same relative position they had prior to the merger with the exception of 500+ AAA pilots that were moved to the top of the combined list. A senior 737 captain is still a senior 737 captain. A junior A320 first officer is still a junior A320 first officer. Had the award gone with the AAA DOH/LOS plan, junior furloughed pilots at AAA would suddenly become senior to line holding captains at AWA.
That sounds so good when somebody who doesn't have a clue about the demographics of the pilot group reads it. It also doesn't take into account the fences that the AAA plan had.

If the AWA plan had included a component where a specific pilot maintained his relative position based on attrition at his previous expectation then it would have been fair.

DOH or LOS with fences were the best answer. I've said that here before and I'll say it again. DOH is truly the only fair way to integrate lists. Fences keep either side from getting a windfall.


TP
Reply
Old 11-25-2007 | 10:56 AM
  #100  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

There is a large number of US Air east pilots who would rather see US Air out of business than work under the contract ALPA is pushing for. They've literally been dragged through the dirt over the years and they don't have much to lose. The pilot group as a whole will give larger dues to fund the union and support their seniority numbers.

ALPA should wake up and treat these guys with some respect. Read this: http://usairlinepilots.org/letters.htm
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
Frisky Pilot
Major
0
06-23-2005 02:46 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
05-19-2005 05:48 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices