Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Single engine turbine PIC worthless or not? >

Single engine turbine PIC worthless or not?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Single engine turbine PIC worthless or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2008 | 09:23 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Question Single engine turbine PIC worthless or not?

To all of you out there is single engine turbine PIC worthless when it comes to the airlines or not?
Old 03-08-2008 | 09:48 AM
  #2  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default Single-Engine Turbine PIC

It depends on the quality of said turbine. For example, United accepts 500 hrs PIC of Fighter time. Back when I interviewed, high-performance miltary trainer time counted, too (T-45, T-6A) towards the fighter-count. The recognition is that these single-engine aircraft had performance that exceeded most multi-engine turbine (civil) aircraft.

If your time is in a turboprop civil aircraft, your time isn't worthless, but you don't have the same advantages as a guy from a military background. I would think your odds would be bettered if you also had mutli-engine time (whether turbine or not).
Old 03-08-2008 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by sdpilot75
To all of you out there is single engine turbine PIC worthless when it comes to the airlines or not?
Single engine is not what they want. It is good for building time if it can get you into a twin turbine, but that is it. 1000 hours of single turbine PIC will not land you a job at the legacies. Are you in a Caravan? If so, that has fixed gear which also does not help you out. Get to a twin and make it a turbine. IMHO.
Old 03-08-2008 | 03:36 PM
  #4  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

I found in the 135/91 world interviewers looked at single TP time like this:

Caravan: "Good, you can spell Power Lever and ITT."
PC-12: "That's a nice airplane. What's your multi time?"
Old 03-08-2008 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Thank you all that is mostly what I have been hearing too. I have 200 hours of Multi PIC Turbine, but I was just entertaining thought since the job is so close to home and the job is flying a Caravan.
Old 03-08-2008 | 11:13 PM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 92
Likes: 2
Default

I have well over 2500hrs turbojet as an FO (stuck at a regional in the 9-11 stagnation) but am now flying a Caravan for quality-of-life issues and have over 1500hrs on it. How would I be perceived if I apply to the majors? Some like UAL are hung up on multi-turbine PIC, while others don't make that distinction, like NWA, DAL, and SWA. I've heard of people with nothing but Agcat time being hired at the aforementioned places though thats the exception rather than the norm and they obviously had gotten some multi-turbine SIC somewhere else.

Thanks,

RC
Old 03-09-2008 | 01:01 AM
  #7  
Shrek's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
25M+ Airline Miles
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 119
Default

Originally Posted by RCAC
I have well over 2500hrs turbojet as an FO (stuck at a regional in the 9-11 stagnation) but am now flying a Caravan for quality-of-life issues and have over 1500hrs on it. How would I be perceived if I apply to the majors? Some like UAL are hung up on multi-turbine PIC, while others don't make that distinction, like NWA, DAL, and SWA. I've heard of people with nothing but Agcat time being hired at the aforementioned places though thats the exception rather than the norm and they obviously had gotten some multi-turbine SIC somewhere else.

Thanks,

RC
I think you answered your own question............if they want want multi turbine - then get it.

We ALL had to sacrifice to get where we are.............
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:30 AM
  #8  
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by sdpilot75
To all of you out there is single engine turbine PIC worthless when it comes to the airlines or not?
As long as you write-up the other (inoperative) engine up in the log book, you can, in good faith, log all this time as multi turbine pic.
Old 03-09-2008 | 08:43 AM
  #9  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 38
Default

HAHAHA....Left engine not found on wing.
Old 03-09-2008 | 08:46 AM
  #10  
capncrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by RCAC
I have well over 2500hrs turbojet as an FO (stuck at a regional in the 9-11 stagnation) but am now flying a Caravan for quality-of-life issues and have over 1500hrs on it. How would I be perceived if I apply to the majors? Some like UAL are hung up on multi-turbine PIC, while others don't make that distinction, like NWA, DAL, and SWA. I've heard of people with nothing but Agcat time being hired at the aforementioned places though thats the exception rather than the norm and they obviously had gotten some multi-turbine SIC somewhere else.
It does not cost you anything to apply. The worst thing that could happen is that nobody calls which is where you are at now. You might as well throw your hat in the ring and see if you get the good call.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Juicegoose
Hangar Talk
32
02-23-2008 05:33 PM
beebopbogo
Cargo
2
10-26-2007 11:59 AM
cheyennedrvr
Regional
7
09-27-2007 11:45 AM
alpar80
Major
11
08-29-2007 06:45 AM
ShortBus_Driver
Regional
38
07-05-2007 04:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices