Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Crew Pass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2008 | 12:35 PM
  #41  
b2pilot186's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
Who's to say that, even with a security clearance from the military, one hasn't done anything that was questionable since obtaining the clearance? Military personnel aren't above wrongdoing. Look at it this way. Suppose a pilot was hired and then furloughed from an airline in fairly short order. That pilot had just undergone a background check. Then said pilot gets hired by another airline. Guess what? He or she will have to do it again. In the context of going from one job to another, it is no different from the military.
...Except that we employ thermonuclear weapons on the aircraft we fly in the military. That requires a little more thorough check than the one we go through to get a job at an airline...and it needs to be updated every so often as well. It is, in fact, quite different with regard to the "job" being done.

B2P
Reply
Old 08-25-2008 | 01:04 PM
  #42  
yankeefly's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: ULCC
Default I Wish It Wasn't Like This

Gabriel,

I hate to say it but methinks you are out of luck. I certainly wish that you could have some access to our flightdecks, but it isn't going to happen. I fear that ZED style fares are all that might be available to you. Good luck. I wish we had more authority over our jumpseats as I wish you guys had similar.

YF

Originally Posted by gabrielps
Hello everybody,

I'm first-officer in a Brazilian airline, and I'm going to the US on October for English classes.

Does anyone know if we can get crew pass or jumpseat pass?

Thanks,

Gabriel.
Reply
Old 08-25-2008 | 01:50 PM
  #43  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: B737-300 right seat
Default

Oh YF, Thank you for the answer.

I can see it. Unfortunetally nowadays we're having more rigid rules.

What type of aircraft do you fly? Where are you based in?

I'm flying B737-300 at Gol. I got my ICAO English level 4 (the minimum for intl flughts) but I'd like to improve my English skills.

Att. Gabriel.
Reply
Old 08-25-2008 | 02:12 PM
  #44  
yankeefly's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: ULCC
Wink Skype Me

To answer you, Skype me yankeefly69 ;-)

I am an RJ flight instructor and ex RJ Captain at the most loved US regional...MESA

;-)

YF

Originally Posted by gabrielps
Oh YF, Thank you for the answer.

I can see it. Unfortunetally nowadays we're having more rigid rules.

What type of aircraft do you fly? Where are you based in?

I'm flying B737-300 at Gol. I got my ICAO English level 4 (the minimum for intl flughts) but I'd like to improve my English skills.

Att. Gabriel.
Reply
Old 08-26-2008 | 01:19 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by b2pilot186
...Except that we employ thermonuclear weapons on the aircraft we fly in the military. That requires a little more thorough check than the one we go through to get a job at an airline...and it needs to be updated every so often as well. It is, in fact, quite different with regard to the "job" being done.

B2P
It doesn't matter if the check is more thorough. Like you said, it needs to be updated and pilots with previous jobs that involved high security clearances are no different and definitely not infallible.

Any new-hire at an airline should go through the background checks....no matter how thorough their past checks. Like I said, when it comes to brass tacks, it is no different from the military.
Reply
Old 08-26-2008 | 03:49 AM
  #46  
b2pilot186's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
It doesn't matter if the check is more thorough. Like you said, it needs to be updated and pilots with previous jobs that involved high security clearances are no different and definitely not infallible.

Any new-hire at an airline should go through the background checks....no matter how thorough their past checks. Like I said, when it comes to brass tacks, it is no different from the military.
The end result is not, but the method is...as you just admitted. That was my only point...like I said. I simply disagreed with your assertion that the checks are no different in the military...you have no idea what a military background check involves. I have been through both processes. We are held to a higher standard during military background checks...necessarily so when dealing with heavily-armed aircraft. This isn't a mil vs. civ contest...it's just reality. We may not be infallible, but if we screw up with nukes the "brass tacks" results are off the scale in disaster potential.

B2P

Last edited by b2pilot186; 08-26-2008 at 04:02 AM.
Reply
Old 08-26-2008 | 04:45 AM
  #47  
stoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: bar stool
Default

So when is this crewpass deal going to go system wide again?
Reply
Old 08-26-2008 | 07:27 AM
  #48  
IFly17's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 FO
Default

On the second photo ID thing, show them your airport SIDA badge. Don't let any TSA agent tell you it is not government issued--unless the airport you're based at is not owned/operated by that city.
Reply
Old 08-26-2008 | 08:00 AM
  #49  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Quite true. If you Airport/ Company badge has a SIDA included in it, is also considered a government issued ID. Like ours are.
Reply
Old 08-26-2008 | 09:43 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by b2pilot186
The end result is not, but the method is...as you just admitted. That was my only point...like I said. I simply disagreed with your assertion that the checks are no different in the military...you have no idea what a military background check involves. I have been through both processes. We are held to a higher standard during military background checks...necessarily so when dealing with heavily-armed aircraft. This isn't a mil vs. civ contest...it's just reality. We may not be infallible, but if we screw up with nukes the "brass tacks" results are off the scale in disaster potential.

B2P
You missed my point. I do know what is involved with higher security clearances and background checks and I never meant that they're the same as an airline's background check. What I said;

It doesn't matter if the check is more thorough. Like you said, it needs to be updated and pilots with previous jobs that involved high security clearances are no different and definitely not infallible.

Any new-hire at an airline should go through the background checks....no matter how thorough their past checks. Like I said, when it comes to brass tacks, it is no different from the military.
Perhaps I should have worded that last sentence better; It is no different for new-hires from the military, nor should it be.

And no, I'm not trying to turn this into a military vs. civilian contest and the "brass tacks" of this thread has nothing to do with your scenario about screwing up with nukes.

My post was in reply to a post that implied an airline background check is redundant because of a security clearance that was held in the past. My point is that the bottom line;
No matter what level of background checks one has been through in the past, due to reasons I stated earlier about no one being infallible, ALL airline new-hires should undergo the same background checks.

Last edited by Zapata; 08-26-2008 at 10:00 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERJ135
Regional
19
07-17-2008 03:45 PM
newarkblows
Major
6
05-23-2008 08:18 PM
flyboy1987
Major
8
01-27-2008 10:25 AM
RightSeatDude
Regional
9
11-01-2007 07:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices