Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
DCA ELDEE Arrival = Pilot Deviations >

DCA ELDEE Arrival = Pilot Deviations

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DCA ELDEE Arrival = Pilot Deviations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2008 | 03:11 PM
  #21  
Thread Starter
New Hire
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

[quote=Jughead;499546]I fly this arrival a lot, and I'm just your average line pogue, but I don't understand the problem here. The letter states, "Here is the problem: The increase in flight crew workload created by the NOTAM requirements are causing airplanes to descend lower than the altitudes prescribed in the ELDEE Arrival procedure."

Why is that? If new crossing restrictions are issued via NOTAM, don't they supercede the published crossing restrictions? I've put those in the FMS (making the first restriction at, not at or above), and with some prior planning, updated winds, and maybe even a fake initial point 3nm from the first restriction, it seems to have worked fine for me.

What am I missing?

,,,,Yes, NOTAM supercedes STAR. Easier said than done at time for some. Like the 10 that filed through ASRS. And there are a lot more that don't file the report (pilots, controllers) and just pretend it didn't happen. This has been going on even before the NOTAM with the problem being multiple crossings with same altitude.

Easy to blame the flight crew. Even easier to fix the procedure with a permanent amendment (ELDEE4 ?)
Reply
Old 11-16-2008 | 03:18 PM
  #22  
Thread Starter
New Hire
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

Whoever designed that arrival is a ............[/quote]


FAA procedures staff (basically, a gal that used to be an air traffic controller at Andrews AFB a few years ago and a fellow that has the title of Support Manager) designed these and every other such procedure in Potomac TRACON's airspace.

They do not work with any other entity (airline reps , ATCers.) At best, whatever complaints they receive after version 1 are considered for version 2.
Reply
Old 11-16-2008 | 05:58 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by DAO1
Whoever designed that arrival is a ............

They do not work with any other entity (airline reps , ATCers.) At best, whatever complaints they receive after version 1 are considered for version 2.
DAO1:

For yours and the sake of other pilots on this forum, I've got to correct you on this one. What you said is totally wrong! They do work with many other entities to come up with these procedures. The issues with this approach implies to me,that they tried to build the approach while meeting the requirements of many other groups and also the FAA Order. Also, I 've worked with these people in the past, and they are a highly quaified, technically astute group of people. Some of the finest within the FAA. Many are previous controllers but some came up through the Flight Standards and Air Navigation and Flight Inspection Services.

Last edited by Onfinal; 11-16-2008 at 06:37 PM.
Reply
Old 11-16-2008 | 06:05 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Default

Guys, I think we are beating this thing to death. Solution.....when they tell you to descend via and you can't make it there is one simple response to ATC. It sounds a little something like this..........."unable." So they vector you around, still better than getting violated.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM
robbreid
Corporate
9
11-15-2008 07:54 AM
normajean21
Flight Schools and Training
30
10-25-2008 09:06 PM
yacko
Military
12
08-18-2008 06:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices