Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
An acceptable pay ratio >

An acceptable pay ratio

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

An acceptable pay ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2008, 01:19 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
willflyforcash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: A320 starboard... Arrrr
Posts: 520
Default An acceptable pay ratio

I have always thought that there should be a standardized ratio between CA and FO pay scales. What do you think about the idea and how should it be implemented?

Personally, i think 5:8 would be a fair ratio.

This would be a set ALPA ratio and would eliminate the need for negotiating 2 sets of pay scales. Obviously exceptions would be needed to be made for the few outfits with FEs.

Usually union negotiators are CAs and perhaps, negotiations begin to favor the top half of the list. If we can raise the lower end of the industry, it will be easier to raise the upper!

Signed, A poor-ass FO.
willflyforcash is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 01:27 PM
  #2  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,544
Default

FO= 60% of CA. (thats a period at the end)
higney85 is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 01:54 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laxrox43's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: A320/321 FO
Posts: 1,114
Default

I think FO's should be paid what CA's are paid. Then take the *new* FO pay, and multiply that by 1.75 to equal what CA's SHOULD be paid. That way, our pay scales here in the states would be somewhat consistant with the rest of the world.

...nuff said
Laxrox43 is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 01:56 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 85
Default

5:8 = 62.5% which is lower than the industry standard of 68%...either you are not a FO or bad at math (or maybe just have really low expectations)
Roger Ball is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 01:58 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,310
Default

Originally Posted by willflyforcash View Post
I have always thought that there should be a standardized ratio between CA and FO pay scales. What do you think about the idea and how should it be implemented?

Personally, i think 5:8 would be a fair ratio.

This would be a set ALPA ratio and would eliminate the need for negotiating 2 sets of pay scales. Obviously exceptions would be needed to be made for the few outfits with FEs.

Usually union negotiators are CAs and perhaps, negotiations begin to favor the top half of the list. If we can raise the lower end of the industry, it will be easier to raise the upper!

Signed, A poor-ass FO.
Most contracts are ratio based already. They just usually publish the pay scales with dollar amounts so no one has to do math. At Delta the normal ratio is 68.3 percent. your ratio is 62 percent so I think it best we stick with the one we have. I believe all major airlines are at least 62% after the first couple of years.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 02:00 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Phrog Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 138
Default

You need a minimum pay. This industry is slowing down due to national economics, but it is also settling down due to deregulation. More and more domestic flying is being done by regionals, low cost carriers and second-tier airlines broken off of former majors. The majors are shrinking and the lower paid airlines are growing. This means stagnation as more and more lower paid pilots compete for fewer and fewer higher paying jobs at the majors.

More regional first officers are going to be sitting in the right seat for longer then a few years. They need enough money to pay off debt, pay the rent and raise a family. They need to be making 35-40,000 a year within 3 years of hiring or they can't afford to stick around.
Phrog Phlyer is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:03 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Not to worry. Age 65 is going to create another pilot vacuum in 4 years. Mix that in with empty flight schools right now and you'll be fine.

Seems like there's a bazillion pilots right now, but take a good look at all the high paying jobs. The majority are gray haired and started flying in Vietnam. They have to leave soon and there aren't enough seats to go around when they do. Then suddenly we get supply and demand working for us and ab initio creates the backlash. Ab initio can't fill left seats though.
labbats is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:10 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 1,105
Default

Originally Posted by Phrog Phlyer View Post
They need enough money to pay off debt, pay the rent and raise a family. They need to be making 35-40,000 a year within 3 years of hiring or they can't afford to stick around.
They need to be making that with-in 6 months of hiring. This crap where some one is supposed to pay penance for the first year is absurd.

I think what the original poster was talking about was more on the regional level. Delta may be at 68% (of course this is after those horrendous concessionary wages you are working for) but here in regional land (where most of us will end up because of the way the business is being parted out like an old airframe). I as a 2nd year FO still make less than 1/2 what the guy with his feet propped up in the other seat checking stock quotes on his blackberry while I do all the work, gets paid. out of breath...

I've always been the type that says put the time in the money and perks will come, I am starting to listen to those that said I was wrong.
STILL GROUNDED is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:12 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by labbats View Post
Ab initio can't fill left seats though.
Very true. And I'm not making a point about how much time someone needs to spend in the right seat before they should be allowed to occupy the left. Either you can do this job of you can't.

What I'm getting at is this; at the Legacies, Cargo, whatever, there are PLENTY of guys that have been in the right seat for a LONG time with PLENTY of experience that are waiting to occupy the left seat.

At the regionals, it's getting similar. There are guys that have been in the right seat (or are now BACK in the right seat) for longer periods of time than we have seen in the past.

The place where it might be an issue at the same places as when the gravy train in flowing. The lower tier carriers that have ALWAYS had relatively quick upgrade times.

But like I said, either you can do this job or you can't.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:23 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Noseeums's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 426
Default

we all got dreams....
Noseeums is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
Clue32
Military
0
10-28-2008 01:35 PM
Overnitefr8
Cargo
4
10-20-2008 02:23 AM
HazCan
Cargo
84
10-11-2008 07:27 PM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
10-02-2008 09:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices