Has outsourced repairs to Aeroman compromised America West safety
#21
...
This is the article about the MRO network from the Airbus webpage....
http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre...23_05_MRO.html
http://www.airbus.com/en/myairbus/fe...17_05_MRO.html
http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre...23_05_MRO.html
http://www.airbus.com/en/myairbus/fe...17_05_MRO.html
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the Airbus link. I had not seen this one.
Now that I'm pretty sure the America West 757's are serviced by TIMCO in Macon, GA, I'd be interested in opinions or experiences about that facility.
One thing I've learned is that is appears only American Airlines still does 100% of major maintenance within American.
Now that I'm pretty sure the America West 757's are serviced by TIMCO in Macon, GA, I'd be interested in opinions or experiences about that facility.
One thing I've learned is that is appears only American Airlines still does 100% of major maintenance within American.
#23
Originally Posted by Will91
Thanks for the Airbus link. I had not seen this one.
Now that I'm pretty sure the America West 757's are serviced by TIMCO in Macon, GA, I'd be interested in opinions or experiences about that facility.
One thing I've learned is that is appears only American Airlines still does 100% of major maintenance within American.
Now that I'm pretty sure the America West 757's are serviced by TIMCO in Macon, GA, I'd be interested in opinions or experiences about that facility.
One thing I've learned is that is appears only American Airlines still does 100% of major maintenance within American.
You're interest has raised a few questions. Do you fly often? Do you own an American Vehicle? How do you feel about the price of your ticket?
I'm just curious 'cause it seems strange to me that you are so concerned about where an airline sends a plane for a heavy check. I'm sure that you are aware that between heavy checks that there are litterally thousands of hands that "inspect" an aircraft. Not all of those hands "inspecting" the aricraft are employed by the company whos logo is painted on the side of the plane.
Airlines fly thousands folks safely to their destination every day. You can be assured that NO pilot is going to fly an airplane that they feel is unsafe. It really doesn't make a difference where mx work is done, cause if your plane crashed due to a mechanical failure, someone will still find a way to blame the accident on pilot error.
#24
The DC-9 that crashed on flight 592 had just come out of a heavy mx inspection from a company called Sabretech in Southern Fl. Then a division of Sabreliner Corporation based in St. Louis. Among other things, they found that the chemical oxygen generators that were replaced had been put in the forward pit, and not properly capped or discharged. In the forward hold a main gear tire was also placed on top of them. Tires and other parts are common when going to an outstation. One of the uncapped generators was "ignited". Basically, these things mix a couple chemicals and the exothermic reaction creates oxygen for the cabin masks. They also get incredibly hot. These ignited and the fire was fed by the pure oxygen while getting hotter as the result of the tire and other stuff in the hold.
Sabretech was noted in the NTSB report a number of times. Most of the work was done by non-certified employees under the "supervision" of an A&P. The removed generators were not properly tagged, and shouldn't have gone on the plane because they were comat.
I did a lengthy report on this one for an aviation safety class back in college. I have the report, all 600+ pages, in a binder and have read it cover to cover a couple times. It's amazing how many times this could have been averted but sadly wasn't. The other amazing thing is how in almost every aviation accident this is the case.
JetBlue and America West, like other 121 carriers in the US have had great safety records in recent years. I wouldn't be worried about flying on them, or any other carrier here. However, be aware that you get what you pay for and if you want cheap tickets this is what you get.
Sabretech was noted in the NTSB report a number of times. Most of the work was done by non-certified employees under the "supervision" of an A&P. The removed generators were not properly tagged, and shouldn't have gone on the plane because they were comat.
I did a lengthy report on this one for an aviation safety class back in college. I have the report, all 600+ pages, in a binder and have read it cover to cover a couple times. It's amazing how many times this could have been averted but sadly wasn't. The other amazing thing is how in almost every aviation accident this is the case.
JetBlue and America West, like other 121 carriers in the US have had great safety records in recent years. I wouldn't be worried about flying on them, or any other carrier here. However, be aware that you get what you pay for and if you want cheap tickets this is what you get.
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by flaps 9
You're interest has raised a few questions. Do you fly often? Do you own an American Vehicle? How do you feel about the price of your ticket?
I'm just curious 'cause it seems strange to me that you are so concerned about where an airline sends a plane for a heavy check.
I'm just curious 'cause it seems strange to me that you are so concerned about where an airline sends a plane for a heavy check.
I know airline travel is safe. Anyone can realize that by looking at the statistics. On the other hand, outsourced maintenance has only built up steam in the past few years as far as I understand. Maybe the favorable statistics to date were because of in-house repairs by airline employees. Let's hope things remain the same or better.
In answer to your other questions, I only fly maybe once or twice a year. I own a Japanese built car simply because I believe it is built much better than comparitively priced American cars. If I had to pay even $100 more for a ticket and know every mechanic that touched that plane had an FAA license, was directly employed by the airline, and legally resided in the USA, I would do it. Mind you, I am not prejudiced that foreign workers can not do an equivalent job, I am concerned about security, FAA and airline oversight, and whether they take a personal "ownership" for the job they do.
I'm sure my question on this board may have seemed "odd" to some. I'm sure most passengers just book the cheapest fare without any consideration of an airline's reputation - much less reading about outsourcing issues. I appreciate that everyone here has been most gracious and generous with their input, but rest assured that my true motivitation for these concerns in purely rooted in the love I have for my family.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Delta Outsources alot of maintenance to Air Canada in Vancouver. Delta sends their 757/767's to Air Canada for maintenance while AirCanada sends their 767's to sinnipore or something like that for maintenance. Seems like the stupidest system ever thought of.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,485
Originally Posted by preludespeeder
Sorry I have to disagree with this trickle down theory that has not worked yet for 25 years. First look at the history lately and tell me were it is working. If businesses used the money like they should instead of lining the share holders pockets, aka the CEO and the board of directors, then maybe trickle down would work. Well some might wonder then what rich people are doing with all this money, I think they are spending it on **** that does not matter, like 350,000 dollar cars made in Europe and on houses that were built years ago. If you think trickle down economics work then you pobably think the rich are taxed to much.
Fast forward to today and CEOs are making hundreds of times the average workers wages and no middle class worker, and especially no tradesman has much security working for a corporation. It's sad to see how greed and avarice have destroyed the American dream. Pilots, mechanics, flight attendants, gate agents ,etc are paying the price for this and have suffered a steadily declining lifestyle where they work harder and harder for less and less.
I far prefer Norman Rockwell's America to that of Carl Icahn, Frank Lorenzo, Stephen Wolf, etc.
Typhoonpilot
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Any fool who thinks outsourcing is good and then tries to back up their argument with economic reasons needs to go to school and learn economics from someone other than a liberal college professor.
I have two concepts that you pro-outsourcing types need to learn about. The first would be "Trade Deficit". Learn what that concept is and see if you can still argue the benefit of having China make our goods for us.
The second is Keynesian Economics. It's a whole lot harder to keep that circle flowing when there's a big whole in the side sucking all the money out to a foreign country.
I have two concepts that you pro-outsourcing types need to learn about. The first would be "Trade Deficit". Learn what that concept is and see if you can still argue the benefit of having China make our goods for us.
The second is Keynesian Economics. It's a whole lot harder to keep that circle flowing when there's a big whole in the side sucking all the money out to a foreign country.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,151
Originally Posted by Pilotpip
Deadstick,
Liberals tend to fight against outsourcing. It's the republicans that love things like NAFTA. Get your sides straight please.
Liberals tend to fight against outsourcing. It's the republicans that love things like NAFTA. Get your sides straight please.
People who assume the thoughts and beliefs about people who vote different from them are foolish in their assumptions. I can't tell you how many times I've heard Silicon Valley employees here, who were raised Republican, rant about how outsourcing is hurting the U.S., and believe it or not, many of them are from other countries, like India! I also can't tell you how many times, I've heard many of my homosexual co-workers complain about illegal aliens getting a free ride in the U.S.
Yes, we in California pay more taxes than a lot of the U.S., but we also absorb the most immigrants, the ones who pick all the fruit and vegetables that the rest of the U.S. consumes at affordable prices.The taxes to pay for their health care, education, crime, and other issues, comes out of my California state taxes, my paycheck. I'm quite frankly tired of people in other states bashing California, when this state and it's economical strength subsidizes the rest of the US. I'm not from here, I'm from conservative Cincinnati, Ohio, but I still love it here. It's far from perfect, but please tell me where is "perfect?"...let the flaming begin...I know it's forthcoming with this group.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post