Has outsourced repairs to Aeroman compromised America West safety
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: recalled until the next round of right sizing to optimise synergies
Originally Posted by Pilotpip
Deadstick,
Liberals tend to fight against outsourcing. It's the republicans that love things like NAFTA. Get your sides straight please.
Liberals tend to fight against outsourcing. It's the republicans that love things like NAFTA. Get your sides straight please.
#42
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Linebacker35
Jet Blue just signed a 10 year $200 million maintenence contract today to send their airbuses to montreal's aircanada maintence base.
Does AC do their own Airbus maintenance, or do they send it elsewhere, as your previous post indicates they do with 767 mx? Does anyone know why such an arrangement would work?
#43
As a maintenance person myself, I have this conversation all the time in my office when I get with the planning guys and our managers to pick out an MRO.
The sad state is this: american repair stations do lousy work. And they are more expensive. The fact that the MRO use mexicans or usually, Salvadorans in sheet metal shops - makes no difference in quality. (usually they are really great)
When Ive been laid off the two majors I worked at, I "contracted". That is when the labor pool of mx workers are like migrants themselves, going from one repair station to the next until that C-check is over and there isnt another one behind it. And worse, the quality is bad because the pay is subpar- and worse than that and most impactful, the treatment is horrendous!
You have to believe me, you could be the hero that fixes everything the first time, but the day you **** up just once, youre fired. And I dont mean major foulup, just break something, or dont do it right the first time requiring more time "put on that task card" and youre out. I have literally seen workers show up on a job that they got sent to in Mobile, only to find that it was cancelled. You foot your own nickel to get there and you leave empty handed. But I digress....
The best work we get is out of Singapore and Haeco (in HKG), even TAECO (in xiamen) and they are also the least expensive. We also use KLM.
The tragedy is that Boeing did NOT consider performing 747-400 freighter conversions in the US like Kansas or Missouri where they used to, they went directly to TAECO. So Boeing is in fact NOT investing in America.
From my point of view, the safety and lower incident rates are due simply to technology and manufacturing. I've worked both Boeing and airbus, and theyre built well, I dont think there are many jobs a mechanic could foul up. So I feel no qualms about getting on any airplane. It flew in, it'll fly out.
As for the economic discussion going on here, one poster was right: China isnt buying Boeings because it wants to, it does it because thats all we make they need. In fact when they try to buy Airbus, Pres. BUSH literally had to strong arm one airline to split its order halfway between Boeing and Airbus.
The whole idea of trickle down economics is bunk because the rich who get so obscenely rich dont really spend that much more than the average american to make an impact on the worker. If I lost my job today, I wouldnt find another 50k a year job, I'd wind up working at Home Depot for 28k.
Ironically, its funny how airline pilots who made upwards of 200k a year for decades are talking about the dwindling middle class.
The sad state is this: american repair stations do lousy work. And they are more expensive. The fact that the MRO use mexicans or usually, Salvadorans in sheet metal shops - makes no difference in quality. (usually they are really great)
When Ive been laid off the two majors I worked at, I "contracted". That is when the labor pool of mx workers are like migrants themselves, going from one repair station to the next until that C-check is over and there isnt another one behind it. And worse, the quality is bad because the pay is subpar- and worse than that and most impactful, the treatment is horrendous!
You have to believe me, you could be the hero that fixes everything the first time, but the day you **** up just once, youre fired. And I dont mean major foulup, just break something, or dont do it right the first time requiring more time "put on that task card" and youre out. I have literally seen workers show up on a job that they got sent to in Mobile, only to find that it was cancelled. You foot your own nickel to get there and you leave empty handed. But I digress....
The best work we get is out of Singapore and Haeco (in HKG), even TAECO (in xiamen) and they are also the least expensive. We also use KLM.
The tragedy is that Boeing did NOT consider performing 747-400 freighter conversions in the US like Kansas or Missouri where they used to, they went directly to TAECO. So Boeing is in fact NOT investing in America.
From my point of view, the safety and lower incident rates are due simply to technology and manufacturing. I've worked both Boeing and airbus, and theyre built well, I dont think there are many jobs a mechanic could foul up. So I feel no qualms about getting on any airplane. It flew in, it'll fly out.
As for the economic discussion going on here, one poster was right: China isnt buying Boeings because it wants to, it does it because thats all we make they need. In fact when they try to buy Airbus, Pres. BUSH literally had to strong arm one airline to split its order halfway between Boeing and Airbus.
The whole idea of trickle down economics is bunk because the rich who get so obscenely rich dont really spend that much more than the average american to make an impact on the worker. If I lost my job today, I wouldnt find another 50k a year job, I'd wind up working at Home Depot for 28k.
Ironically, its funny how airline pilots who made upwards of 200k a year for decades are talking about the dwindling middle class.
#44
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by IntheBiz
When Ive been laid off the two majors I worked at, I "contracted". That is when the labor pool of mx workers are like migrants themselves, going from one repair station to the next until that C-check is over and there isnt another one behind it.
The best work we get is out of Singapore and Haeco (in HKG)
The best work we get is out of Singapore and Haeco (in HKG)
Interesting. Both Hong Kong and Singapore are effectively city-states with relatively immobile work forces, thereby precluding a migrating system like the one you describe in the US... Would you say that this has a positive impact on the quality of work that they provide?
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by lagavulin
Does AC do their own Airbus maintenance, or do they send it elsewhere, as your previous post indicates they do with 767 mx? Does anyone know why such an arrangement would work?
These arrangments seem pointless. I guess Delta and Jet Blue are heavily overpaying.
Their other big clients are United and Mexicana.
#46
Originally Posted by deadstick
That's all fine if you are a stockowner, but not if you are part of the working class of America. Putting Americans out of a job because it benefits your bottom line will eventually erode your client base. Unemployed people don't fly. They stay at home worrying about their mortgage. Sure, the rich people will have more money to spend on goods, but those goods were outsourced, so the working man gains nothing from it. When people stop flying, those orders are going to slow down, Boeing will have fewer orders, stockholders sell, and the Keynesian circle starts to stall out (no pun intended).
Originally Posted by deadstick
Possibly, until they start to manufacture their own medium size aircraft. Let's also not forget that as a very nationalistic people, they would buy Chinese goods even if they cost more than American. Turning backs on a nation's own workforce is an American defect, not a common practice everywhere. China's own growth in GDP is also beginning to cause them problems, so it is likely that the trade deficit will never balance out. Seems that now that China is getting a taste of the good life with their enhanced GDP, they run the risk of losing their own export base. Their own investment in their manufactoring sectors is starting to increase their operating expenses. As a result, some US companies are moving operations out of China to another place that hasn't invested in R&D but has a good source of cheap labor. American companies just keep moving on to the next country to exploit. Soon, manufacturing towns in China will look like Detroit. I doubt that will ever cure the trade deficit.
The trade deficit and outsourcing are two completely different animals. Most economists don't even concern themselves with the trade defict as it really is not a big deal. Check out the website and get a clue:
http://www.ou.edu/class/econ3003/book/area1c35.html
Originally Posted by deadstick
I doubt you have ever been replaced in your career by outsourcing or an immigrant with an H1B Visa. I am amazed that you think an economy could continue to function without an employed middle-class. Forcing an entire class of people into unemployment by closing factories will stop the circle. I am curious to know how much you understand about Keynesian economics. The whole concept is what has kept this country from having another depression.
I don't know how to make it any more clear, outsourcing is not a bad thing. Ryane has provided you with 2 perfect examples. Your so tied up in your Keynesian economics (the circle is there but your choosing not to see it) and thinking the entire middle class of America is unemployed, you fail to see the big picture - outsourcing is not a bad thing.
Last edited by JMT21; 04-26-2006 at 09:06 PM.
#47
Wow this thread has two topics at once.
First JMT21 you talk about how the unemployment rate has remained constant for the last fifty years. I agree with you but the question I ask you is what is the quality of the jobs that people are getting. For example, you have a small town that has a group of mom and pop shops selling goods to the town, employing people with jobs that pay above minimum wage. Then you get a big company who comes in and opens up a lost cost super center who sells everthing for cheaper and that shuts the small businesses down. Now the unemployment rate has not changed but now the wage rate has gone down, so that now affects quality of life of people in the town and to top it all off the big business is now taking all of the revenue out of the city and lining share holders pockets. But gosh darn it unemployment stayed the same. And I know you are thinking "hey they are paying less though now" but think for one minute you save what a few dollars on useless things but you lose two dollars an hour in wage and the business owners are now poor like you.
Second thing is about the trade defecit. It is bad because with the endless cycle this country is in of soaring defecits and a soaring trade defecit, what do you thing is going to happen. If you look at the dollar it is going down which means now we have to pay more dollars to buy the same product from another nation. Just think oil.
So not only are we taking money away from the people with offering lower paying jobs but now it is costing more money to get the same stuff. But gosh darn it I have to agree out source all of those jobs so we can pay less for stupid useless ****.
First JMT21 you talk about how the unemployment rate has remained constant for the last fifty years. I agree with you but the question I ask you is what is the quality of the jobs that people are getting. For example, you have a small town that has a group of mom and pop shops selling goods to the town, employing people with jobs that pay above minimum wage. Then you get a big company who comes in and opens up a lost cost super center who sells everthing for cheaper and that shuts the small businesses down. Now the unemployment rate has not changed but now the wage rate has gone down, so that now affects quality of life of people in the town and to top it all off the big business is now taking all of the revenue out of the city and lining share holders pockets. But gosh darn it unemployment stayed the same. And I know you are thinking "hey they are paying less though now" but think for one minute you save what a few dollars on useless things but you lose two dollars an hour in wage and the business owners are now poor like you.
Second thing is about the trade defecit. It is bad because with the endless cycle this country is in of soaring defecits and a soaring trade defecit, what do you thing is going to happen. If you look at the dollar it is going down which means now we have to pay more dollars to buy the same product from another nation. Just think oil.
So not only are we taking money away from the people with offering lower paying jobs but now it is costing more money to get the same stuff. But gosh darn it I have to agree out source all of those jobs so we can pay less for stupid useless ****.
Last edited by preludespeeder; 04-26-2006 at 11:05 PM.
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
#49
Originally Posted by preludespeeder
First JMT21 you talk about how the unemployment rate has remained constant for the last fifty years. I agree with you but the question I ask you is what is the quality of the jobs that people are getting. For example, you have a small town that has a group of mom and pop shops selling goods to the town, employing people with jobs that pay above minimum wage. Then you get a big company who comes in and opens up a lost cost super center who sells everthing for cheaper and that shuts the small businesses down. Now the unemployment rate has not changed but now the wage rate has gone down, so that now affects quality of life of people in the town and to top it all off the big business is now taking all of the revenue out of the city and lining share holders pockets. But gosh darn it unemployment stayed the same. And I know you are thinking "hey they are paying less though now" but think for one minute you save what a few dollars on useless things but you lose two dollars an hour in wage and the business owners are now poor like you.
When talking about outsourcing, realize that the times are always changing. What happened to the blacksmiths, saddle makers, elevator operatos, and soon to be auto workers? The times change, people lose their jobs, but people are also able to adapt and move on to something else.
Originally Posted by preludespeeder
Second thing is about the trade defecit. It is bad because with the endless cycle this country is in of soaring defecits and a soaring trade defecit, what do you thing is going to happen. If you look at the dollar it is going down which means now we have to pay more dollars to buy the same product from another nation. Just think oil.
Originally Posted by preludespeeder
So not only are we taking money away from the people with offering lower paying jobs but now it is costing more money to get the same stuff. But gosh darn it I have to agree out source all of those jobs so we can pay less for stupid useless ****.
#50
Originally Posted by deadstick
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



