Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
AMR walks out on Pilot negotiations >

AMR walks out on Pilot negotiations

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AMR walks out on Pilot negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2009 | 06:32 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
Keep the talent? Last I heard the unemployment rate was at 8.5%. I bet they could find some pretty damn good talent in that pool if they looked, and I bet they'd be cheap.
I realize I could get flamed here for saying this and want to point out that I am no defendant of ridiculous bonuses...but isn't that argument exactly what everyone on here hates about the pilot group? Blasting the guy that is willing to work for less and lowers the bar for the rest? We all hate the guy who goes non-union and will work for table scraps so it just seems to me that this statement is a little hypocritical in a sense.
Old 04-03-2009 | 06:58 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 12
From: Maddog FO
Default

Table scraps for an AA exec is still more than you'll ever make as a pilot, no matter who you fly for..
Old 04-03-2009 | 07:08 AM
  #13  
MAXforwardspeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CA/FO
Default

Hold the line! Dont give up on scope!

Max AE FO
Old 04-03-2009 | 08:36 AM
  #14  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by 402Fanatic
I realize I could get flamed here for saying this and want to point out that I am no defendant of ridiculous bonuses...but isn't that argument exactly what everyone on here hates about the pilot group? Blasting the guy that is willing to work for less and lowers the bar for the rest? We all hate the guy who goes non-union and will work for table scraps so it just seems to me that this statement is a little hypocritical in a sense.
The problem most of us have with the recently publicized bonuses is that the executives didn't deserve them based on their performance. That's what Pilotfrog was referring to I'll bet. I have no problem whatsoever giving a bonus to a talented manager with a profitable track record. Bonuses for the talented ensure that you keep the talented. Bonuses for executives regardless of performance is the rub. If your company has poor executive talent, you're better off paying less for a new kid right out of MBA school. He/she couldn't do much worse - as witnessed by AIG, GM, Chrysler, Bear Stearns, etc....

Carl
Old 04-03-2009 | 09:16 AM
  #15  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by MAXforwardspeed
Hold the line! Dont give up on scope!

Max AE FO
Yes the APA needs to be hard negotiators, be firm... be like this guy (got to read the captions) especially the note about the shoes....

YouTube - ENZYTE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6Unw...om=PL&index=23

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC5Ls...CF4D1&index=25

Notice the Captain and FO's salute in the last video.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 04-03-2009 at 09:36 AM.
Old 04-03-2009 | 03:23 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Default

Come on guys! Keep strong and focused...dont budge! Get what you are worth!
Old 04-03-2009 | 03:29 PM
  #17  
Riddler's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat, Toyota Tacoma
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Interesting lines being drawn on the APA scope debate.

According to management's posting, American is basically looking for Delta scope. Expansion into the use of 76 seat RJ's and deleting specific references to American Eagle, so they can start the bidding (a'la Delta Connection).

APA responds with a proposal that American Airlines pilots perform all American flying with the provision for an eventual merger of Eagle.

American's management is basically arguing the same position as D-ALPA. That bringing flying to mainline would drive up costs unacceptably (or as as ALPA says it, would drive the mainline pay down unacceptably).

For all of us, it is interesting to watch it unfold. As a Delta pilot, I'm pulling for the APA.
AA and Eagle merging under a 76 seat scope agreement would be disasterous. Within minutes, AA would gain several thousand employees, then furlough 60% of them and farm out 76 seat flying to Air Pakistan or some BS regional startup. Flight schools would rejoice because of all the "new jobs."

This profession has already given up too much scope. Look where it got us today!
Old 04-04-2009 | 12:28 AM
  #18  
FliFast's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
From: I was acquired, Not Hired
Default

Has either side mentioned "impasse" yet ?

FF
Old 04-04-2009 | 12:59 AM
  #19  
wheresmyplane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: CRJ 200 Furloughed FO
Default

Sure - that's all American pilots need. Ten different regionals all running around with "American Connection" painted on the side. Worked great for Delta.
Old 04-04-2009 | 11:49 AM
  #20  
avi8tor4life's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
Default

Hold strong on scope. Don't let up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
Roper92
Major
31
03-22-2009 11:26 AM
fireman0174
Major
0
03-20-2009 01:19 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices