When the 65ers retire
#41
Exactly. And if they want to give the money to their kids that's their business. I might do the same depending on the situation in 12 years.
#42
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 72
Hey Sport,
Why should they be left out? Yes, they did serve their country. What does that have to do with age 60? They still had no problem as they were moving up due to age 60 but when they got close it was all of a sudden age discrimination. These guys all have , and continue to receive their military pensions(rightfully earned) and most use Tri-Care vs company insurance also. Again, it is what it is now, but we don't have to like it or respect it.
Back at ya!
Why should they be left out? Yes, they did serve their country. What does that have to do with age 60? They still had no problem as they were moving up due to age 60 but when they got close it was all of a sudden age discrimination. These guys all have , and continue to receive their military pensions(rightfully earned) and most use Tri-Care vs company insurance also. Again, it is what it is now, but we don't have to like it or respect it.
Back at ya!
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Hey Sport,
Why should they be left out? Yes, they did serve their country. What does that have to do with age 60? They still had no problem as they were moving up due to age 60 but when they got close it was all of a sudden age discrimination. These guys all have , and continue to receive their military pensions(rightfully earned) and most use Tri-Care vs company insurance also. Again, it is what it is now, but we don't have to like it or respect it.
Back at ya!
Why should they be left out? Yes, they did serve their country. What does that have to do with age 60? They still had no problem as they were moving up due to age 60 but when they got close it was all of a sudden age discrimination. These guys all have , and continue to receive their military pensions(rightfully earned) and most use Tri-Care vs company insurance also. Again, it is what it is now, but we don't have to like it or respect it.
Back at ya!NERD,
Once again your socialistic/communistic economic flair is showing. So now you are the one to decide the income level that is too high to allow someone to keep the job that they rightfully earned. The smart pilots amongst us realized early on that the airline industry is a cyclical one and that only the lucky few skate through without a furlough or a company completely going under. The smart ones amongst us diversified our household income streams that flow in and have numerous sources of income. Some that even surpass what we make in the airline industry; not to mention wives with lucrative and successful careers. So, I should give up my job that I have earned in order to help you out because I was smart and now earn too much? You need to move to Venezuala -- I think Hugo Chavez has a job for you as economic czar. Cheers!
Thunder1
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



