Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

CAL #4 and NWA #5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2006, 12:18 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by B757200ER
One thing Gordo said in the book about management was this: The sickest patients need the best doctors. He meant he had to go out and recruit talent that would come to help rescue CAL, and he had to compensate them, or they wouldn't come. The best managers would be able to facilitate the turnaround, and It looks like he was right.
I find it interesting that all the majors started bleeding cash right after 9-11 while southwest continued to be profitable quarter after quarter and this was before the jump in fuel prices. Why couldn't CAL (or any other major for that matter) turn a profit before the fuel increases while southwest was able to.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 06-01-2006, 02:19 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 183
Default eric stratton ???????????????

Tell me you are using sarcasm with that last question....Do you really think you can compare SWA w/ any Legacy carrier???? Apples and oranges dude. No one--not a sole even at SWA--could have predicted SWA success. And if they did, they are BSing at best. SWA has built an incredible airline, but I'm not on the SWA forever bandwagon. They will have some problems (maybe minor), maybe not for 5 years...but they will! With guys willing to fly at teacher salaries for jetblue its just a matter of time before SWA tries to go Intl. then things change.

Compare the Legacies dumba__. You have CAL and AAL "right now" leading the pack and may continue to run for 10 years.
CargoBob is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 05:50 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
Is upgrade THAT quick now? That doesn't sound right.?
Many FO's prefer to fly the 767 and 777 rather than the 737 as CA. 1/2 of the CAL pilots retire in the next 8-10 years. CAL has 4500 pilots and pilots with the 3400 numbers are holding EWR 737 CA. Yes it is true. (unless something happens)
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 05:57 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
I find it interesting that all the majors started bleeding cash right after 9-11 while southwest continued to be profitable quarter after quarter and this was before the jump in fuel prices. Why couldn't CAL (or any other major for that matter) turn a profit before the fuel increases while southwest was able to.

I think we are talking real airlines, not "Walmart Airlines". Walmart does well when things are bad too. Easy to make money when you don't spend any money on customer service or comforts.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 09:08 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by CargoBob
Tell me you are using sarcasm with that last question....Do you really think you can compare SWA w/ any Legacy carrier???? Apples and oranges dude. No one--not a sole even at SWA--could have predicted SWA success. And if they did, they are BSing at best. SWA has built an incredible airline, but I'm not on the SWA forever bandwagon. They will have some problems (maybe minor), maybe not for 5 years...but they will! With guys willing to fly at teacher salaries for jetblue its just a matter of time before SWA tries to go Intl. then things change.

Compare the Legacies dumba__. You have CAL and AAL "right now" leading the pack and may continue to run for 10 years.
cargo bob

You seem to be as bright as just about any management out there. Here's a definition of apples to apples and apples to oranges.

apples to apples, legacies carry passengers and just like southwest does. hence apples and apples.

apples to oranges, legacies carry passengers while cargo carries, guess what bob, they carry cargo.

that's apples to apples and apples to oranges.

Who cares if anyone could have predicted southwests success after 9-11. They did it which proved itself while everyone else lost hundreds of millions and southwest kept turning a profit. They've had consistantly lower load factors than the majors and still turned profits.

I love how manangement says they don't compete agains LCC's because that isn't what they're selling up until they come to their employees for paycuts because they are losing to the LCC's.

Why would I want to compare airlines that have record load factors along with record losses. Their sole plan it to outlast the other majors and not transform into what will make money. I heard a number 2 guy say this "we don't compete against the LCC's because that isn't what we do but we will not get beat on ticket prices." Huh. That to me seems like they do, because if they didn't, then they wouldn't care about the passenges who fly the LCC's.

Bob you must be a fan of wheel of fortune. See if you can get this one.
J_CK_SS
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 09:15 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
I think we are talking real airlines, not "Walmart Airlines". Walmart does well when things are bad too. Easy to make money when you don't spend any money on customer service or comforts.
Then maybe that's what the airlines are coming to. If they aren't going to pay for the customer service or comforts then maybe they shouldn't get any. It's a simple concept give the customer what it is willing to pay for or at least charge a price that will make you money.

ps when did southwest not become a real airline?
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 06-04-2006, 03:28 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton

ps when did southwest not become a real airline?
Since they are like Greyhound. I've flown on them, never again. But then, I don't even like coach on nice airlines. I guess I'm spoiled.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-04-2006, 03:52 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Since they are like Greyhound. I've flown on them, never again. But then, I don't even like coach on nice airlines. I guess I'm spoiled.
yea I wasn't a fan either but guess what, we as airline employees aren't the customer. coach is coach they all suck once you get used to first. the difference is that the airlines with first class are losing money while that greyhound airline isn't.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 06-04-2006, 07:35 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Guppy Capt.
Posts: 1,887
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Many FO's prefer to fly the 767 and 777 rather than the 737 as CA. 1/2 of the CAL pilots retire in the next 8-10 years. CAL has 4500 pilots and pilots with the 3400 numbers are holding EWR 737 CA. Yes it is true. (unless something happens)
That IS odd, to me I guess. I did meet a 18+ year FO on the 767. We were jumpseating from DTW to EWR (he eventually going to Rome). He said he would rather stay in the right seat, and have quality, and hard line than to go to the left. I just thought he was a rare one. But I also just talked to another friend, he said there are a lot like that at CAL.
Still waiting for the call.
Short Bus Drive is offline  
Old 06-04-2006, 07:48 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
He said he would rather stay in the right seat, and have quality, and hard line than to go to the left. I just thought he was a rare one. But I also just talked to another friend, he said there are a lot like that at CAL.
Lots of them at UAL. Huge difference in the quality of life as a 747 or 777 F/O to Asia and Europe vs. narrow body junior 737/A320 Captain on reserve or crummy line. I never did it that way, but I certainly understood why it occured.
fireman0174 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Major
9
08-05-2006 09:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices