Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
House passes pilot training  bill >

House passes pilot training bill

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

House passes pilot training bill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2009, 10:04 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 189
Default

As for myself, I am pleased to see the premium placed on a four year education within this bill. However, I would like to see this importance manifest itself differently. That is, I would like to see the requirement be that 1500 hours, an ATP, and a 4-year degree from any accredited university be the requirement to fly ticket paying American passengers through our skies. The requirement for a four year degree truly establishes the Airline Pilot profession as just that - a professional organization of educated, skilled workers. It:
- Establishes every member as an educated professional worthy of much more than 18K/year
- Establishes a baseline of education, one that has guaranteed a minimum standard of general university requirements in critical thinking and communication.
- Completely eliminates the ability of the industry to produce ridiculously quick entrances to the profession - which has the same effect as printing money in times of shortage. It devalues the currency.

I think we could go on all day about how raising the standard of education in our industry helps us all, but I digress. I am saving it for my letter to my Senator. In a state like WY - there is virtually no mainline flights putting wheels on a runway outside of Jackson Hole. Essentially, I think we could all agree that a more professional organization could be argued to be a safer one. Hopefully, the good Senator will agree. I urge those of you with similar sentiments to express them to your congressmen and women as well.

Fair Skies and Tailwinds......

S2G
Silver2Gold is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 11:27 AM
  #102  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Silver2Gold View Post
As for myself, I am pleased to see the premium placed on a four year education within this bill. However, I would like to see this importance manifest itself differently. That is, I would like to see the requirement be that 1500 hours, an ATP, and a 4-year degree from any accredited university be the requirement to fly ticket paying American passengers through our skies. The requirement for a four year degree truly establishes the Airline Pilot profession as just that - a professional organization of educated, skilled workers. It:
- Establishes every member as an educated professional worthy of much more than 18K/year
- Establishes a baseline of education, one that has guaranteed a minimum standard of general university requirements in critical thinking and communication.
- Completely eliminates the ability of the industry to produce ridiculously quick entrances to the profession - which has the same effect as printing money in times of shortage. It devalues the currency.

I think we could go on all day about how raising the standard of education in our industry helps us all, but I digress. I am saving it for my letter to my Senator. In a state like WY - there is virtually no mainline flights putting wheels on a runway outside of Jackson Hole. Essentially, I think we could all agree that a more professional organization could be argued to be a safer one. Hopefully, the good Senator will agree. I urge those of you with similar sentiments to express them to your congressmen and women as well.

Fair Skies and Tailwinds......

S2G

Silver2Gold,

Great post!!!!
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 11:38 AM
  #103  
Line Holder
 
AU96's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 737 FO, T-6 Trunk Monkey
Posts: 42
Default

Shack, Ag2Au!
AU96 is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 12:48 PM
  #104  
New Hire
 
Wegs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Cessna 172 Student Pilot
Posts: 8
Default

I agree, yes, that a degree is an important thing to have. However, I disagree with saying that, if one has a degree, that they are automatically more capable. I, for one, did not have parents who could begin to afford to put me through school. I've been forced to pay bills since I was 16 and live in lieu of college. Secondly, I know way too many people with degrees that are absolutely clueless, and whom I would NEVER trust in a cockpit. That being said, I think it is b.s. to say that having a degree deems a person more capable of flying Americans around the friendly skies. I don't want to be a pest about this matter, but it is something which I feel very strongly about. College does not instill logic and common sense, which I feel are sometimes more important in life.
Wegs is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 06:59 PM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
superduck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: A320, Left
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Silver2Gold View Post
As for myself, I am pleased to see the premium placed on a four year education within this bill. However, I would like to see this importance manifest itself differently. That is, I would like to see the requirement be that 1500 hours, an ATP, and a 4-year degree from any accredited university be the requirement to fly ticket paying American passengers through our skies. The requirement for a four year degree truly establishes the Airline Pilot profession as just that - a professional organization of educated, skilled workers. It:
- Establishes every member as an educated professional worthy of much more than 18K/year
- Establishes a baseline of education, one that has guaranteed a minimum standard of general university requirements in critical thinking and communication.
- Completely eliminates the ability of the industry to produce ridiculously quick entrances to the profession - which has the same effect as printing money in times of shortage. It devalues the currency.

I think we could go on all day about how raising the standard of education in our industry helps us all, but I digress. I am saving it for my letter to my Senator. In a state like WY - there is virtually no mainline flights putting wheels on a runway outside of Jackson Hole. Essentially, I think we could all agree that a more professional organization could be argued to be a safer one. Hopefully, the good Senator will agree. I urge those of you with similar sentiments to express them to your congressmen and women as well.

Fair Skies and Tailwinds......

S2G
Thank you for this post. Well said.

Hopefully, this Bill will end the "Puppy Mills" pumping out "Airline pilots" in 9 months with the education of "Miss South Carolina" babbling about not enough maps for people or something!
superduck is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 07:41 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Wegs View Post
I agree, yes, that a degree is an important thing to have. However, I disagree with saying that, if one has a degree, that they are automatically more capable. I, for one, did not have parents who could begin to afford to put me through school. I've been forced to pay bills since I was 16 and live in lieu of college. Secondly, I know way too many people with degrees that are absolutely clueless, and whom I would NEVER trust in a cockpit. That being said, I think it is b.s. to say that having a degree deems a person more capable of flying Americans around the friendly skies. I don't want to be a pest about this matter, but it is something which I feel very strongly about. College does not instill logic and common sense, which I feel are sometimes more important in life.
Wegs:

I'm sorry that you are financially strapped. I've been there. My dad cut me off after the first year of college. Afther that I paid for college, supported myself, and ended up needing government loans for my final two years. It isn't easy.

However, I feel strongly that airline pilots do indeed need a college degree in order to work as an airline pilot. Consider this. As an airline pilot, you can literally have a couple hundred people in your hands in any one day. Doctors for the matter, do not. Yet, you would never go to a doctor who wasn't a degreed professional or got a degree from an online college or Devry Institute.

As airline pilots we are professionals -- we must be critical thinkers, there's a distinct body of knowledge required and it keeps changing which requires us to keep mastering our profession, there's certification, there's a certain technique with our work, and we get paid adequately.

If I had it my way, I would make the requirement to be a technical degree. But I am willing to let the folks who take basketweaving fly a plane if they prove to pass the ATP standards / tests.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 08:20 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Right...CL65
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by superduck View Post
Thank you for this post. Well said.

Hopefully, this Bill will end the "Puppy Mills" pumping out "Airline pilots" in 9 months with the education of "Miss South Carolina" babbling about not enough maps for people or something!
Yea, that will hopefully put an end to taxiway landings... Oh wait. Nevermind...
xtreme is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 09:51 PM
  #108  
Line Holder
 
superduck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: A320, Left
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by xtreme View Post
Yea, that will hopefully put an end to taxiway landings... Oh wait. Nevermind...
No, but,

It may put an end to "Colgan Air" type buffooneries.

Captain allows aircraft to stall, pulls full back yoke in respose. The female "Nimrod" FO screams and raises the flaps!

How are we doing so far here? It was all over at 2000 feet. No attempt to recover, full aft yoke all the way down. Killed 22 people, (one on the ground).

At least Delta did not hurt anyone, let alone kill anyone!

Big difference between landing on the wrong runway..err taxiway and not being capable of recognizing or even recovering from a simple stall!

Delta passengers walk off on a jetbridge, Colgan passingers are carried off in body bags.

Big difference!
superduck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
nwa757
Regional
23
06-11-2009 05:50 AM
Precontact
Cargo
29
05-25-2009 10:37 AM
whtever
Regional
109
12-15-2008 09:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices