Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Questions from a controller >

Questions from a controller

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Questions from a controller

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2009 | 06:07 PM
  #51  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
Landing with anything less than flaps 30 at AA is usually reserved for emergencies or strong winds... I wasn't aware other airlines landed with less.
At DAL flaps 25 is the standard configuration for landing, unless it's a short field (SNA!) or a tailwind.

Lower power settings on final, way fewer overspeeds. And it only increases the calculated landing roll about 200 feet. Like they taught us in the Herk, brakes stop the airplane.

When they first came out with the change a couple years ago, I thought they were crazy. After I did a few, preferred 25. There's a few DAL holdouts that still only do 30.
Old 11-28-2009 | 07:05 PM
  #52  
Captain Bligh's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
For Captain Bligh - please state time/date of incident so that I might find some credibility in your post. Otherwise.........
Whatever...



Old 11-28-2009 | 07:51 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by quimby
What airline did you say you fly for?
DD,

Delta it is. Glad you guys have a spotless safety record.


Didn't a Delta a/c recently operate at about 130 kts on a taxiway?
Old 11-28-2009 | 08:11 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Fero's
Default

Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
afraid to taxi faster than 20 kts.()

SWA has a linear flow generally, which means a few minutes saved here and there could help.
Oscar,

If you are referring to my post, it was 30 knots that scares me. Again, I am not talking about any one carrier. I see many different airlines at speeds that just don't make sense to me.

Most accidents/incidents I have seen in the last thirty years, have happened on the airport.

The linear flow thing you mention sheds a little light. Like I said earlier, two minutes isn't worth it to me. Risk reward and all... I do operate in a hub and spoke system though.

Cheers
Old 11-28-2009 | 09:06 PM
  #55  
SomedayRJ's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: BE50C (A), BE95 (A), C172S (B)
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
Landing with anything less than flaps 30 at AA is usually reserved for emergencies or strong winds... I wasn't aware other airlines landed with less.
Nor I - I would assume that the lower the touchdown speed the better for the brakes and such.

AA does have the RRs. Couple of my friends who flew the TWA birds (Pratts) did say they decelerate quicker than ours, probably due to the bigger engine cowling (RRs are much more streamlined.) Not sure about the idle speeds.
Isn't approach idle also intended to ensure sufficient pneumatic flow for TAI use? (that is, approach idle also gets selected when any TAI switch is on—thus, it would also be an RR 'feature')

Also, not sure if your (DL) 757s all have winglets.... all of ours are done, and believe you me when I say the sucker doesn't slow down.
Some of the DL 757s do—the ex-TWA machines certainly all do. I don't recall if the plan is to refit all of them. From what I'm told, the wingletted machines are even harder to slow down than the conventional 752s.
Old 11-28-2009 | 09:29 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Readback
You have not been paying attention to what I've been saying. AA only taxis slow when there are contract negotiations ongoing. Once the negotiations are over, it's normal taxi.

Clear enough. Once your negotiations are finished you will see what I'm talking about.
I've been jumpseating on AA for a long time and have always 'marveled' at how much garbage they put on the Captain vs. other carriers. I've always been pretty much in the middle of the road on taxi speeds, but when I'm up front on AA, watching them taxi out SE at a busy airport, discuss TO data before the FO goes heads down to load it, watch the Capt. start the remaining engine, run the checklist, do the F/A pa and the chime later, I rarely find myself thinking about their taxi speed. As others have said, AA and SW are common targets for taxi speed complaints. What I always find funny about the never ending argument though, is that AA guys explain why but rarely deny that they taxi slow, but you never see a WN guy admit that any of their guys taxi fast.
Old 11-29-2009 | 12:05 AM
  #57  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Okay, so back to the OP question....

Many times we ask for a goofy runway for unusual performance reasons, some I may only partially understand (some quirk to the climb out, runway gradient, temporary obstacles, requirements of a departure).

Sometimes it is an added margin of safety.

Sometimes we ask for a goofy runway for an abnormality.

Sometimes we ask for a a short cut if traffic permits and courtesy allows.

And a small number of jerks ask for a goofy runway to get to the hotel, or a jump seat, or home a few minutes quicker and blame in on "performance".


Taxi speeds vary based on company procedures (we changed ours recently to allow the FO to stay heads up rather than heads down running a checklist so we are probably taxiing faster), wx, traffic, and the emotions/attitudes/experience of the individual holding the tiller.

Last edited by FlyJSH; 11-29-2009 at 12:22 AM.
Old 11-29-2009 | 12:35 AM
  #58  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by SomedayRJ
Nor I - I would assume that the lower the touchdown speed the better for the brakes and such.


Isn't approach idle also intended to ensure sufficient pneumatic flow for TAI use? (that is, approach idle also gets selected when any TAI switch is on—thus, it would also be an RR 'feature')


Some of the DL 757s do—the ex-TWA machines certainly all do. I don't recall if the plan is to refit all of them. From what I'm told, the wingletted machines are even harder to slow down than the conventional 752s.

1. Carbon brakes wear more by the cycle than from speed at application. All our carbon brake equipped aircraft (all 757s and the 767ERs) utilize flaps 25 and idle reverse whenever possible. The fuel savings really adds up...

2. When TAI is selected, idle increases to compensate. Otherwise it's at normal flight idle.

3. There is only a minute difference between the wingletted planes and non wingletted. If you really looked at it you could tell a slight difference with the winglet planes not wanting to slow down or descend as much but you've really got to be looking for it...and reserve fuel is a couple hundred pounds less.
Old 11-29-2009 | 12:48 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH


And a small number of jerks ask for a goofy runway to get to the hotel, or a jump seat, or home a few minutes quicker and blame in on "performance".

If it is within performance limits and not inconveniencing anyone, what's wrong with that?

Sincerely,
The Jerk
Old 11-29-2009 | 07:18 AM
  #60  
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: B737/Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
Whatever...



Pictures are nice, but they don't provide proof. Even with my limited skills I might be able to photo shop something similar. The aircraft damage you are showing would indicate a smaller aircraft and I am curious what part of a 737 might have come in contact with said aircraft. Again a date and location would help me to sort out the circumstances involving your incident. I certainly would not believe most people on APC and wouldn't expect them to believe me without more to reference. No offense intended just asking for more info.

The Oscar
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Riddler
Military
16
09-28-2009 08:32 AM
AmericanEagleFO
Hangar Talk
4
08-12-2009 10:00 AM
Capn Mac
Major
8
05-29-2009 12:13 PM
king of clowns
Flight Schools and Training
6
02-22-2009 02:09 PM
ANG4Me
Military
10
01-31-2009 08:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices