Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Questions from a controller >

Questions from a controller

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Questions from a controller

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2009 | 01:35 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

Just looking at the NTSB database for the past 5 years came up with these three. They all involved running into company aircraft though. I could care less about taxi speeds though I just wish you guys could turn off your landing lights, strobes and wing inspection lights before taxiing by at night.


http://ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id...1700&key=1

http://ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id...0042&key=2

http://ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id...0283&key=2
Old 11-29-2009 | 01:53 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by shfo
Just looking at the NTSB database for the past 5 years came up with these three. They all involved running into company aircraft though. I could care less about taxi speeds though I just wish you guys could turn off your landing lights, strobes and wing inspection lights before taxiing by at night.


LAX06LA009A

LAX07LA064A

DFW08IA074A
Are these a/c taxiing by you before/after crossing a runway?......cause that's when all that stuff is on. Just like every other airline.
Old 11-29-2009 | 02:00 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by quimby
Are these a/c taxiing by you before/after crossing a runway?......cause that's when all that stuff is on. Just like every other airline.
not at AA, exterior lights are captain's discretion. Once again, another area where AA needs to be different.
Old 11-29-2009 | 02:08 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

No I have no problem with that because like you said everyone else is like that. It's well after landing like on Q north bound after landing 25L at LAX. Most of the time it's just the stobes and wing inspection but I've seen the landing/retractable recogs on many times as well. Everyone forgets every once in a while but it seems like 95% of the time it's SW taxiing with it all lit up.
Old 11-29-2009 | 02:13 PM
  #65  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
not at AA, exterior lights are captain's discretion. Once again, another area where AA needs to be different.

Haha, yep. Our's (DAL) is "all available lighting ON" anytime crossing a runway.

One of my friend's interned at AA... pulled their checklist out for me for the 757/767. Quite cumbersome was the first description that came to mind.

NWA's was a lot different from ours, but very efficient, and DAL's is efficient in other regards.
Old 11-29-2009 | 02:30 PM
  #66  
SomedayRJ's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: BE50C (A), BE95 (A), C172S (B)
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Haha, yep. Our's (DAL) is "all available lighting ON" anytime crossing a runway.
Delta and every flight school I've ever flown with have it right, then — if you've got a light, turn it on when you're going 'cross the big concrete. Indeed, that's official FAA guidance if memory serves—Operation Lights On. Operation of anticollision lights are at the Captain's/PIC discretion by 14 CFR 91—if their operation creates a hazard, then you don't turn them on.
Old 11-29-2009 | 03:37 PM
  #67  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
If it is within performance limits and not inconveniencing anyone, what's wrong with that?

Sincerely,
The Jerk
Reread the post.... one sentence above I wrote:

Sometimes we ask for a a short cut if traffic permits and courtesy allows.
Old 11-29-2009 | 03:40 PM
  #68  
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: B737/Capt
Default

Originally Posted by chuckyt1
Oscar,

If you are referring to my post, it was 30 knots that scares me. Again, I am not talking about any one carrier. I see many different airlines at speeds that just don't make sense to me.

Most accidents/incidents I have seen in the last thirty years, have happened on the airport.

The linear flow thing you mention sheds a little light. Like I said earlier, two minutes isn't worth it to me. Risk reward and all... I do operate in a hub and spoke system though.

Cheers
Chucky,

As I said, a different system can cause one to operate their aircraft differently. If your aircraft has systems that would make you suspect of taxiing over 20 kts. then don't. On a straight taxiway I feel comfortable at 30kts. and observe that because our FOM says (and Boeing recommends) that is the limit. Not wrong, just different. With 17,000+ hours in the 737 maybe I am too comfortable. That is always a possiblity. You can call it luck, but I have never (we all no what comes after that statement) injured a FA or anyone else. I agree it is all about risk vs. reward, but please when you accuse someone else (I am not saying you did) that they are unsafe, it would be nice to show why.

The Oscar
Old 11-29-2009 | 03:48 PM
  #69  
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: B737/Capt
Default

Originally Posted by shfo
Just looking at the NTSB database for the past 5 years came up with these three. They all involved running into company aircraft though. I could care less about taxi speeds though I just wish you guys could turn off your landing lights, strobes and wing inspection lights before taxiing by at night.


LAX06LA009A

LAX07LA064A

DFW08IA074A
Thank you for your references. I still would like to have the proof that Captain Bligh might have been involved in an incident so that he could say - I was "bashed" by SWA. Maybe he had access to the same info and pictures that might be available and wished to overstate his involvement. I am just asking!

The Oscar

BTW, If and when such proof is divulged I will admit it right here and now. It still won't prove that SWA is the only one who has such incidents and it is because they taxi too fast.
Old 11-29-2009 | 04:01 PM
  #70  
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: B737/Capt
Default

Originally Posted by ksatflyer
Hey guys thanks a bunch for all the answers. I will print this after a few more days to get as many replies to share with others at work. As far as for the "operational necessity" I never considered second stage climb, not really many obstacles out there but I know not everything always makes sense haha. As far as the taxi speed stuff, sounds to me like most AAL pilots do not mind others passing them on other taxiways which makes me feel better about doing it. I completely understand the reasoning behind it! Thanks again yall!
ksatflyer,

As I said I expected this to get hijacked and it was. Maybe I was partially responsible.

Perhaps there are some "old" guys/gals where you work who could provide some help with and incident that I experienced and even mentioned the last (or maybe a few times back) time taxi speeds came up here on APC. While taxiing out to 12R we found two AA MD's taxiing rather slowly in front of us and without our intitiating it the ground controller had us switch to tower freq where we were cleared to back taxi and takeoff on 12R. No disruption, no fuss, and no complaints from the AA aircraft. Just an example of the situational awareness of the controllers wanting to move traffic efficiently.

Thanks for wanting/doing your job well!

The Oscar
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Riddler
Military
16
09-28-2009 08:32 AM
AmericanEagleFO
Hangar Talk
4
08-12-2009 10:00 AM
Capn Mac
Major
8
05-29-2009 12:13 PM
king of clowns
Flight Schools and Training
6
02-22-2009 02:09 PM
ANG4Me
Military
10
01-31-2009 08:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices