Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Futile RAH/YX/F9 thread number.......7? >

Futile RAH/YX/F9 thread number.......7?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Futile RAH/YX/F9 thread number.......7?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2010, 12:50 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirty Rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Default

Originally Posted by likeitis View Post
Without Yx or F9 you would have been regulated to flying 76 seats or less for the rest of your life. The ONLY reason you have a chance of flying anything bigger and being the lowest bidder contract company is the fact that F9 and YX employees spent the last 20+ years building a real airline you now have the ability to move up to without applying and interviewing. You chose to stay at a regional so thats your career expectation. YX and F9 pilots actually earned their positions further up the food chain. To blame pilots for the rise and fall of an airline is ignorant at best. We all know the pilots have very little or no affect on the success of an airline.
Great post. All RAH pilots need to read this and understand you are gaining at our expense. We will remember.
Dirty Rat is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 12:54 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Boeing
Posts: 102
Default

one of the stipulations states that the arbitrators ruling cannot cause "financial harm" in the form of training costs. If the arbitrator chooses to ignore that contractual language, so be it. However, profit has zero to do with this scenario...it is the other side of the balance sheet.
Woodbourne is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 02:25 PM
  #113  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by MD80 View Post
My point is, I think AirTran would buy Midwest for 50 million (1/8 of the original bid) without the TPG/Republic merger. TPG didn't even offer Midwest up for sale because they were already in merger talks with Republic.

Second, without Republic, SWA may have been the only exit financing for Frontier to come out of bankruptcy. Time could have been arranged to make a integration deal between Frontier and SWA.
If your point waswhat you think then you shouldn't try as pass it as inaccurate facts.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 02:36 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
3XLoser's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: awkward
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by frankwasright View Post
Oh,you're such a joker.Here's a little project for you:

Go back ten years and draw a timeline of CHQ and YX.Ten years ago,CHQ still had Saabs and J31's.then came 135/140/145's,then E170/175/190's,the turboprops disappeared,the seniority list multiplied by a factor of 5.YX,well...not so much.How much career expectation did you have at a shrinking airline ,hmmm ? See how those two arcs diverge ? Airtran wanted YX,just not bad enough.You make it sound like the F9 pilots' future at SWA was wrecked by RAH-maybe a SWA staple had something to do with it,ya think ?
Well I'm at the ten year mark. I'll bite.

Ten years ago I was hired into the DC-9 for a wage that was higher than the top FO wage at Republic. At one year I got a huge raise, but it was coincidentally even higher than the percentage, since I was holding a line. You can't talk about holding a line without discussing work rules, which inevitably bring life style. I had a couple of short 9/11 furloughs, and ended up on the 717. What a great machine. I would've flown it untill I retired.

So, I'm enjoying my life, making around six figures as an FO, when a bidding war begins for little Midwest Airlines. This delayed the anouncement for the MD-80 fleet replacement, which probably would've allowed me to upgrade, except that I didn't care. I already have jet PIC time. Everyone does. You can't get a career job without it right? And once you have a career job, upgrade seems trivial. Do I really want to go back to reserve, and didn't I already get hit by the alternative minimum tax last year anyway?

So this private equity firm beats out Air Tran by 25 cents per share, which ended up being $452,000,000.00. Don't know if we were profitable or not, the private equity firm refused to open the books. But they did decide to immediately begin dismantling Midwest for a second sale (or was there only transaction in this incestuous business?). Obviously since Republic was involved by this point, it's disengenuous to compare my situation right now, that is locked out, with someone of similar longevity from Republic. Had the initial bidding war never occurred (sorry, there was no evidence that Midwest was going out of business), or had Air Tran won, your comparison would've been foolish, but unfortunately, those are stories that won't be written.
3XLoser is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 04:18 PM
  #115  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by 3XLoser View Post
(sorry, there was no evidence that Midwest was going out of business), or had Air Tran won, your comparison would've been foolish, but unfortunately, those are stories that won't be written.
http://ccbn.10kwizard.com/download.p...=1&cik=1159154

It's the only financial info I've ever seen. Sorry things have gone the way they have 3X. It does paint a picture of the cynical side of this industry. Not trying to start a street fight just if people want hard numbers to debate over there you go.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:01 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
3XLoser's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: awkward
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
http://ccbn.10kwizard.com/download.p...=1&cik=1159154

It's the only financial info I've ever seen. Sorry things have gone the way they have 3X. It does paint a picture of the cynical side of this industry. Not trying to start a street fight just if people want hard numbers to debate over there you go.
Thanks Toiletduck. There's some great stuff in there, including the fact that Republic paid a penalty to get out from under the 717s. If only we could've had that proof a couple of months sooner, we would've won our outsourcing grievance. Ouch. I think everyone knows that TPG overpaid for Midwest, but the CEO really needed to get his stock options above water. ...but Midwest wasn't doing bad before this, which by the way make good snapshots of our dismantling.
3XLoser is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:12 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
http://ccbn.10kwizard.com/download.p...=1&cik=1159154

It's the only financial info I've ever seen. Sorry things have gone the way they have 3X. It does paint a picture of the cynical side of this industry. Not trying to start a street fight just if people want hard numbers to debate over there you go.

Do you think there is a chance TPG took a few million out of Midwest before the merger?

Why did BB say this...

The total costs to restructure and recapitalise Midwest are likely to reach $35 million. From an operating perspective Midwest is currently profitable, says Bedford. But Republic has advised the market that Midwest is likely to "go back into a loss-making situation for the fall and probably January and February, although we don't think it is significantly loss making". Once Midwest finalises its restructuring in early 2010 Bedford predicts: "We're going to be profitable, strongly profitable, in the second quarter of next year and we'll continue to be profitable thereafter."
MD80 is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:59 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
G-Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 737
Default

Originally Posted by MD80 View Post
Do you think there is a chance TPG took a few million out of Midwest before the merger?

Why did BB say this...

The total costs to restructure and recapitalise Midwest are likely to reach $35 million. From an operating perspective Midwest is currently profitable, says Bedford. But Republic has advised the market that Midwest is likely to "go back into a loss-making situation for the fall and probably January and February, although we don't think it is significantly loss making". Once Midwest finalises its restructuring in early 2010 Bedford predicts: "We're going to be profitable, strongly profitable, in the second quarter of next year and we'll continue to be profitable thereafter."
That is what we call "spin". Why acquire a airline if it is a loser? It is standard phraseology from a CEO. Crafty devil, unless he is correct.
G-Dog is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 06:20 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirty Rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Default

Originally Posted by 3XLoser View Post
Thanks Toiletduck. There's some great stuff in there, including the fact that Republic paid a penalty to get out from under the 717s. If only we could've had that proof a couple of months sooner, we would've won our outsourcing grievance. Ouch. I think everyone knows that TPG overpaid for Midwest, but the CEO really needed to get his stock options above water. ...but Midwest wasn't doing bad before this, which by the way make good snapshots of our dismantling.
It also shows that the RAH lawyers LIED to the arbitrator. This grievance needs to be refiled and reheard now.
Dirty Rat is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 10:48 PM
  #120  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by MD80 View Post
Do you think there is a chance TPG took a few million out of Midwest before the merger?
TPG has been in investor for a long time with airlines and is still around with piles of cash. I think the fishy part is how much they paid before quickly pulling the plug. They've known what they were doing in the past so what's their end game here?

3X that information has been public for a pretty good while. I posted it once 5 months ago. I have no idea how long it was available before then.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Senior Skipper
Regional
18
06-07-2009 06:12 AM
Airfix
Regional
17
04-28-2009 03:37 PM
Bucking Bar
Major
60
03-08-2009 07:43 AM
skypine27
Cargo
2
03-03-2009 08:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices